Sen. Franken Introduces Bill To Keep Your Location Safe

Wednesday June 15, 2011 2:58 PM PDT by Jordan Golson
After hearing from Apple, Google, and others last month, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) today introduced The Location Privacy Protection Act of 2011, a new bill that would require companies to take better care of user location information on mobile devices:
The Location Privacy Protection Act of 2011 is a narrowly-tailored bill that would close current loopholes in federal law to require any company that may obtain a customer’s location information from his or her smartphone or other mobile device to (1) get that customer's express consent before collecting his or her location data; and (2) get that customer's express consent before sharing his or her location data with third parties. If any company obtains the location information for more than 5,000 mobile devices, that company will also have to (3) take reasonable steps to protect that information from reasonably foreseeable threats; (4) tell an inquiring customer whether or not they have his or her information, and (5) delete that information if that customer so requests it.
The Senator "concluded that our laws do too little to protect information on our mobile devices" and noted that "this legislation would give people the right to know what geolocation data is being collected about them and ensure they give their consent before it’s shared with others."

Just a few weeks ago, Senator Franken sent a letter to Apple and Google, requesting that both companies require app developers to have "clear and understandable privacy policies".

It would appear that Apple is already in compliance with sections 1 through 3, and presumably sections 4 and 5 are fairly easy to implement. iOS apps are already required to ask users for permission to use their location data and iOS devices display an icon in the top bar to indicate when location data is being used.

Repeated attempts by MacRumors to obtain the full text of the bill through Senator Franken's office were unsuccessful, though a one-page summary [PDF] is available.

This isn't the first time Congress has attempted to regular location information on mobile devices. A similar bill was introduced in 2001 by then-Senator John Edwards (D-NC). In fact, the bill had an identical title, The Location Privacy Protection Act of 2001.

That bill would have ordered the FCC to require providers of location-based services to:
(1) inform customers about their policies on the collection, use, disclosure of, and access to customer location information; and (2) receive a customer's express authorization before collecting, using, retaining, or disclosing such information.
The Edwards bill died in committee.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

Posted: 44 months ago
Ah yes, the government will happily protect our location data from those mean corporations while in the same breath renewing the Patriot Act which allows them to skirt the entire Constitution when it comes to privacy.
Rating: 10 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
Just another "Agree" button I'll have to push without reading what I'm agreeing to...
Rating: 6 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago

Ah yes, the government will happily protect our location data from those mean corporations while in the same breath renewing the Patriot Act which allows them to skirt the entire Constitution when it comes to privacy.






I'm not travelling to the US because they can basically copy everything off your phone, laptop etc without stating any real reasons. Most companies advise their employees not to carry any such devices when travelling to the US. Needed data etc is simply downloaded or transferred over the web


And in other news, foil stock jumps 7.6%
Rating: 6 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
Question:

How is a company able to comply with 4 & 5 if all the location data they collect is completely anonymous?
Rating: 4 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago

Ah yes, the government will happily protect our location data from those mean corporations while in the same breath renewing the Patriot Act which allows them to skirt the entire Constitution when it comes to privacy.


Best. Comment. Ever.
Rating: 3 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
Step 4 would be very easy. “No” :) And that solves Step 5 too!

Ugh If you're a Franken Constituent please don't vote him again. I'd rather Apple, Google, Facebook, Verizon, AT&T, and Nestle-Tollhouse know my habits, where I go/where i shop/where I sleep/and what I do over my government.


I can’t help but think there isn’t really as much separation as you think, between our government and the deep-pocketed corporations that pull its strings.
Rating: 2 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
oh, yay!

So glad that Stuart Smally is hard at work on our budget issues... anonymous GPS information is a much more important issue to tackle.



:confused:
Rating: 2 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
Ugh If you're a Franken Constituent please don't vote him again. I'd rather Apple, Google, Facebook, Verizon, AT&T, and Nestle-Tollhouse know my habits, where I go/where i shop/where I sleep/and what I do over my government.

Companies want us to use their crap. And the (our?) Government wants everything we are.

I'd rather pay taxes to apple... at least they'll give us something that works won't steal out of our pockets... and if its broken (MobileMe) they will actually fix it (iCloud)...

How 'bout them :apple:'s??
Rating: 1 Votes
Posted: 20 weeks ago
I checked govtrack and the last billed failed to pass and this one (according to govtrack) only has a 24% chance of passing. Al needs to work on getting these bills passed and stop harassing Apple. These threatening letters makes it seems like its Apple fault. Can "they" get access to your fingerprint data? "They" is "you" Al. Stop forcing companies to hand over data and there will be no "they" accessing the fingerprint data.
Rating: 1 Votes
Posted: 44 months ago
That's great, but who will police the police?
Rating: 1 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]