Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Scaling Back Near-Term Plans for Cloud-Based iTunes?

CNET reports that Apple may be scaling back its initial plans for cloud-based iTunes offerings as it continues to struggle to reach agreements with record labels to allow users to stream their iTunes content from Apple's servers to a variety of Internet-connected devices. Apple has been thought to be placing a priority on developing the service since its acquisition of streaming music firm Lala Media last December.

But eight months after the acquisition, Apple is telling executives at the four top labels that if Apple offers any cloud-music features within the next few months, they will likely be "modest in scope" and not include the kind of functionality that Apple outlined in meetings with the labels, such as storing users' music on its servers, sources told CNET. They added that Apple still hasn't negotiated the kind of licensing deals it would need to distribute music from the cloud.

The report notes that while it is not clear exactly why Apple has been unable to make substantial progress on the cloud streaming initiative beyond ongoing struggles to bring music labels onboard, there does appear to be some uneasiness within the Lala Media team. One of Lala's founders who moved to Apple with the acquisition has reportedly left the company, while the Lala team has been said to be working on an undisclosed video feature rather than the music-related technology it was noted for prior to the acquisition.

Of course, a focus on video for the Lala team could mean that the company is concentrating its efforts more on cloud-based streaming of TV and movie content, an aspect of the initiative that had been hinted at earlier this year. The move would also align with Apple's rumored Apple TV revamp, which will reportedly see limited on-board storage in favor of a cloud-based streaming model.

Apple may also be waiting for its massive North Carolina data center to come online at the end of the year, as it seems likely to require the center's capabilities in order to deploy its cloud-based initiative.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

20 months ago
Icon Fail.:D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
How do you even vote on this story?

Some things might happen...or maybe something totally different. Unless not.

I think I'll abstain from this one.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
With services such as Pandora, Slacker or Rhapsody, I don't know if iTunes can compete. So it would let me stream music I already own to various devices. What's the fun in that? On the go I have the iPhone/Pod which has my own music. At home I have the iMac streaming to my AV setup, and I'm sure many have apple tv's. I'm pretty much covered. I don't need a centralized storage for music. Now, if they want a subscription based offering with access to all of their music, sure. I'll bite. But that's already out with Rhapsody.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
I keep seeing this speculation that the NC datacenter will underpin streaming iTunes. Doesn't wash for me. You don't build your own CDN with a monolithic datacenter that is relatively distant from major population areas. Streaming media is ideally served from geographically diverse sites that are positioned near major population centers to minimize latency in stream delivery to end user. Maybe Apple is also building that more quietly, and maybe some significant part of the NC datacenter will be involved in iTunes, but I suspect NC will be used for something more like a MobileMe-style service for warehousing iOS cloud sync that does not have the latency performance requirements of a streaming iTunes service.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
This is why I hate that Apple acquired lala, I loved that service, they already had the agreements in place but now that Apple dissolved them they have to go about re instating those agreements.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
All I'm interested in is being able to stream the content of my computer at home to my devices when I'm on the road over the apple servers, i don't wanna store it in a cloud at all, so i hope they will do that instead ( like simplify media did ).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

With services such as Pandora, Slacker or Rhapsody, I don't know if iTunes can compete. So it would let me stream music I already own to various devices. What's the fun in that? On the go I have the iPhone/Pod which has my own music. At home I have the iMac streaming to my AV setup, and I'm sure many have apple tv's. I'm pretty much covered. I don't need a centralized storage for music. Now, if they want a subscription based offering with access to all of their music, sure. I'll bite. But that's already out with Rhapsody.


iTunes is already dominant in the marketplace, just not with streaming or subscriptions. So if Apple adds either or both to iTunes, iTunes will compete very well with those other services simply because so many people have invested so much in their iTunes libraries. This would merely extend the functionality in new ways. Automatic success simply because of Apple's market share in the music world.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

iTunes is already dominant in the marketplace, just not with streaming or subscriptions. So if Apple adds either or both to iTunes, iTunes will compete very well with those other services simply because so many people have invested so much in their iTunes libraries. This would merely extend the functionality in new ways. Automatic success simply because of Apple's market share in the music world.


Sure, they could get a bigger "bite" of the market just because they have a ton of users already on board. I'll agree there. But looking at the mediocre success of Rhapsody, I can't really see it becoming a big money maker. Like I said, 80% of people would be streaming on-the-go, which makes little sense since you already have the content with you.

Now, if they do Video. That's a different story.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
I like clouds.
But I don't want my music stored on one.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Here's what I want...

To be able to give my mom an iPad and have her never need to attach it to a computer, yet still get:
[LIST]
[*]ability to get content (I know... already exists)
[*]backup existing content to the could
[*]apply iOS updates as they get pushed out
[/LIST]

She lives in a different state, has a crappy old Dell laptop, and would be much better off with an iPad instead for email/facebook/viewing pics of grandkids

... I could really care less about streaming content from the cloud at this point...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]