Wall Street Journal and Kobo Pull Direct Content Sales From iOS Apps [Updated]
People who download the app and want to subscribe will have to either call customer service or visit WSJ.com.
"We remain concerned that Apple's own subscription [rules] would create a poor experience for our readers, who would not be able to directly manage their WSJ account or to easily access our content across multiple platforms," a Journal spokeswoman said.
Mike Serbinis, Kobo's chief executive, said Apple told Kobo Saturday that it could no longer operate its digital bookstore from its Kobo apps and had to stop selling e-books directly through them. Kobo subsequently altered the apps so that they no longer sell digital titles.
Now Kobo customers who want to buy digital books via their Apple devices will have to visit www.kobo.com via Apple's Safari browser to make their purchases, a potentially more laborious process for customers used to buying e-books directly through a Kobo app. Customers will continue to be able to access and read Kobo-purchased books from their library on various Apple devices.
Apple had set a deadline of June 30th for apps to comply with the new rules, but has reportedly been lenient about enforcement as it continues to work with high-profile developers on making their apps compliant. But with the Wall Street Journal, Kobo, and potentially Google's eBooks service all pulling direct content sales from within their apps, it certainly appears that not all of the holdouts are working toward addressing the issue by supporting in-app subscriptions and purchases.
Update: Google Books has returned to the App Store with the link to the company's bookstore removed, although the app's description mentions only "minor enhancements and bug fixes" among the changes included in the update.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)Why would you buy a Kindle rather than just go to Amazon's site in a browser, buy your book, and have it sent to your iPad?
I buy my Kindle books on Amazon's web site and have them delivered to my iPad. Apple won't be getting any in-app purchases from me for newspapers and books until they stop this insane policy of shaving off 30% from already-thin margins.
Translation: Even though Apple provides an excellent experience for our readers, it provides a lousy experience for the WSJ since we don't get access to our reader's personal data which we can then sell for lots of money.
Don't you think it's more likely that the information will be used to determine the direction of the bookstore? For instance, as a seller I would like to know which kinds of books sell best. Or how much a customer is willing to pay for a book. There are all kinds of metrics that a retailer needs to steer on when running a store. This is important data for the store itself, I'm sure it isn't going to sell this valuable information to a competitor.
Subscriptions are not the same as other items. Subscription pretty much always means a reduced rate for a long term agreement, paid in advance.
Therefore, the 30% cut that might be reasonable at per issue pricing, is not reasonable for a subscription. Apple needs to get something for providing the store, but 30% when it comes to subscriptions is too high - they should look at something closer to 15%.
[ Read All Comments ]

Blizzard Entertainment said this week that it sold more than 3.5 million copies of Diablo III on launch day, setting the record for fastest-selling PC game. The company also sold 1.2 million copies...
Hard drive maker Seagate has announced it will purchase data storage device maker LaCie for roughly $186 million.
The company plans to buy the controlling stake owned by Philippe Spruch,...
Intuit has upgraded the iOS app for its Mint personal finance tool with two new "most-requested" features that should keep users from ever having to go to the Mint.com website. Until now,...