Apple to Phase Out Rosetta 2 Starting With macOS 28 as Intel Era Ends - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple to Phase Out Rosetta 2 Starting With macOS 28 as Intel Era Ends

by

Following its WWDC keynote on Monday, Apple updated a developer document to indicate that Rosetta 2 will remain available through macOS 27.

apple silicon 1 feature
Rosetta 2 enables Macs with Apple silicon (Arm architecture) to run apps that were built for Macs with an Intel processor (x86 architecture), by translating code.

Starting with macOS 28, Apple said that only a limited version of Rosetta 2 will remain available for older games that rely on Intel-based frameworks:

Rosetta was designed to make the transition to Apple silicon easier, and we plan to make it available for the next two major macOS releases – through macOS 27 – as a general-purpose tool for Intel apps to help developers complete the migration of their apps. Beyond this timeframe, we will keep a subset of Rosetta functionality aimed at supporting older unmaintained gaming titles, that rely on Intel-based frameworks.

The document also reiterates that macOS Tahoe will be the final macOS release that supports Intel-based Macs. However, Apple said that Intel-based Macs will continue to receive security updates for an additional three years.

macOS Tahoe is compatible with only a handful of Intel-based Macs, including the 16-inch MacBook Pro (2019), 13-inch MacBook Pro (2020, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports), 27-inch iMac (2020), and Mac Pro (2019).

macOS 28 will be released in 2027.

Tags: Apple Silicon Guide, Intel, Rosetta

Popular Stories

New Intel Logo

Report: Apple Agreed to Intel Chips Amid White House Tariff Talks

Monday July 13, 2026 2:54 am PDT by
Apple faced pressure from the White House to use Intel's chipmaking plants while it was negotiating relief from semiconductor tariffs last summer, reports The Wall Street Journal ($). In August 2025, Apple CEO Tim Cook was in Washington to lobby the Trump administration to drop its proposed 100 percent tariff on semiconductor imports – a levy that would have raised costs across Apple's...
Read Full Article • 73 comments
apple silicon feature joeblue

Apple Silicon Exec Explains Mac Mini AI Demand and On-Device Future

Monday July 6, 2026 5:10 am PDT by
Apple's Mac mini and Mac Studio have become the machines of choice for running AI agents, according to Doug Brooks, Apple's senior product manager of Apple silicon. Brooks made the claim while discussing Apple's chip strategy in a newly published interview with The Deep View conducted just prior to WWDC 2026 in June. Brooks says that the company has seen "incredible demand" for the two...
Read Full Article • 55 comments
apple silicon 1 feature

Apple Silicon is Taking an Unexpected Turn

Friday July 10, 2026 7:24 am PDT by
Ever since the Mac switched from Intel processors to Apple silicon starting in 2020, each generation of M-series chips has included higher-end Pro and Max variants. If a recent report proves to be accurate, though, that streak will be coming to an end. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple will be releasing a regular M6 chip, but it has no plans to offer higher-end M6 Pro and M6 Max...
Read Full Article

Top Rated Comments

turbineseaplane Avatar
turbineseaplane
15 months ago
Bummer

Lots of software will get lost forever
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TruthAboveAllElse Avatar
TruthAboveAllElse
15 months ago
This is unfortunate. Rosetta 1 was almost unusable at times so made sense to phase it out. Rosetta 2 is usually totally invisible to the user, so a shame to break compatibility.
Score: 32 Votes (Like | Disagree)
L
Lounge vibes 05
15 months ago
Intel getting an extra three years of security updates means that 2019 MBPs will have received 10 years of official support, from 2019 to 2029.
Where is the guy that made that massive thread the other day saying Intel computers would become bricks this fall?
And I think this confirms that M1s will likely be supported at least in a security capacity into the early 2030s easily.

While it’s definitely unfortunate that Rosetta is being dropped, Apple actually giving a timeline for these kind of things, including how long the Intel computers will get security updates, is big progress.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
StudioMacs Avatar
StudioMacs
15 months ago

Imagine being a Mac Pro buyer who spent $50,000 in 2019 on the top-tier configuration, only for Apple to announce its migration to Apple Silicon a year later. Now imagine a company that invested in 10, 20, or even 50 of those Mac Pros—would you buy Apple again?
If purchased by a business in such quantities, the cost of the tangible assets over their useful life has been depreciated for tax purposes. In the US, the IRS generally assigns a 5-year useful life to computers and related equipment.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
iHorseHead Avatar
iHorseHead
15 months ago

Intel getting an extra three years of security updates means that 2019 MBPs will have received 10 years of official support, from 2019 to 2029.
Where is the guy that made that massive thread the other day saying Intel computers would become bricks this fall?
And I think this confirms that M1s will likely be supported at least in a security capacity into the early 2030s easily.

While it’s definitely unfortunate that Rosetta is being dropped, Apple actually giving a timeline for these kind of things, including how long the Intel computers will get security updates, is big progress.
A lot of people don't realise that Intel Macs are getting much better support than PowerPC Macs. Imagine spending like 3k on a Mac Pro and then it's supported only from Tiger to Leopard.
Like from 2005 to 2009.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zorinlynx Avatar
zorinlynx
15 months ago
This is one of the things I honestly hate about the Apple platform, despite loving many other things about it.

They don't care about keeping older software working.

You can still run Windows applications from the late 90s on Windows 11 and they often work perfectly without modification. Good luck running any Mac software from even half that long ago.

They did it with MacOS 9 to Mac OS X. Then with PowerPC to Intel 32 bit. Then they did it with Intel 32 bit to Intel 64 bit. Now they're doing it with Intel to ARM.

Every decade or so Apple completely breaks older software. It's like a tradition of theirs.

With Rosetta 1 they had licensed code they had to pay for, so they had an excuse. Not so with Rosetta 2. It would be trivial for them to just keep Rosetta 2 going perpetually. But they won't, because they just don't care about backwards compatibility long-term.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments