Apple Rejects iOS App for Citing Pebble Support in App Store Description [Updated]

Boating and navigation app SeaNav US [Direct Link] reported this morning that Apple is no longer welcoming the app on the App Store due to the mention of Pebble support, or "any other mobile platform", within the app's description.

Pebble Time
SeaNav notes that its iOS app has been previously approved by Apple with no fuss, and have only faced roadblocks after receiving the rejection email this morning. The app supported Pebble for "nearly 2 years" before today, and the company says the app's most recent update has "no changes to our support for the Pebble", hinting that the impending launch of the Apple Watch could be the main culprit of the crackdown on SeaNav.
We have just had the latest version of our SeaNav US iOS app rejected by Apple because we support the Pebble Smartwatch and say so in the app description and meta-data (we also state in the review notes that "This application was approved for use with the Pebble MFI Accessory in the Product Plan xxxxxx-yyyy (Pebble Smartwatch)". See copy of rejection reason below.

SeaNav US has previously been approved by Apple with no problem, we have had Pebble support in SeaNav for nearly 2 years and there are no changes to our support for the Pebble in this version. What are Apple doing? Have they gone Apple Watch crazy? What can we do?
App Store review guideline 3.1 has covered the prohibition on mentioning competing platforms for some time, but until now developers have generally not had issues with Apple rejecting apps for mentioning Pebble support. With the Apple Watch ready to launch, however, Pebble may now be considered a competing platform.

Apple has been known to deal swiftly with apps it deems questionable on the App Store in the past, but today's news is definitely interesting given the reason for rejection and the launch of the Apple Watch tomorrow. SeaNav US should be able to resubmit the app after removing all mentions of the Pebble smartwatch from its marketing materials and App Store page, but it certainly leaves an interesting question for the future of Pebble-supported iOS apps, especially Pebble's dedicated iOS app, presuming SeaNav's rejection was not the result of a reviewer misunderstanding Apple's intended application of the guidelines.

Update 9:32 AM: The developer of Home Remote notes in the Pebble discussion thread that he had an update approved just last night. Pebble is mentioned in his app's description, so it remains unclear whether SeaNav's rejection is part of a specific shift in policy for Apple.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
14 months ago
My guess is that the app will be accepted with absolutely no issues whatsoever, so long as you just remove mention of the pebble from the App Store description.

Having settings inside the app to link it up with the pebble, and mentioning the pebble on your company homepage should be fine.
Rating: 14 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
well that is just stupid
Rating: 14 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
I'll be watching for the FTC investigation. If Apple starts to block me from using competing devices I will make the switch to Android or Windows Phone.
Rating: 11 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
Makes me wonder what will happen when/if Google launches an app making Android Wear compatible with iPhone.
Rating: 6 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
Can you really blame them for keeping people from advertising other devices that competes with one they make? That would be like walking in to a video game store and advertising your own store down the street, saying "We have almost the same stuff but cheaper!"
Rating: 6 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
How is this not an anti-competitive business practice? Come on, Apple!
Rating: 6 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago

Apple doesn't make a "remote for Fire Stick" or "remote for Samsung TV," but they do make a Watch...


Apple TV is a competitor to the fire stick.
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago

Can you really blame them for keeping people from advertising other devices that competes with one they make? That would be like walking in to a video game store and advertising your own store down the street, saying "We have almost the same stuff but cheaper!"


Eh, it gets a little hairier than that. This is too much like what Microsoft got excoriated for in the 90's, in fact I think it's worse. iOS is a platform, and while I appreciate the strict control Apple has on it in order to stay secure (in theory), doing this for peripherals? If this is true (and this is a BIG if, we never get Apple's side of the story in these instances), it's very bad news.

It's bad enough that Amazon's app has to redirect me to their website to avoid paying the Apple Tax if I want to buy a Kindle book. To restrict mention of accessories because they (sorta) compete with you? No, no, no.

I've always said that if the the Mac had won the computing war over Microsoft in the 80's into the 90's, Apple would have been a far more anticompetitive company than Microsoft was. I still think that's true, except this time they ARE winning the war (on some fronts). I love their products (err, see below) but this kind of thing shouldn't be tolerated.

Again. If.
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
Oh **** you Apple. Actions like this just make me even less interested in the Apple Watch.

What an awful move. Will Apple be removing apps that link to console games such as the GTA, Steam, Xbox, or Playstation companion apps? The official Pokemon apps encourage people to play the games on 3DS. Chromecast app better watch out too... and the Amazon app for selling music and books.

Shame on Apple.


No, of course they won't remove that stuff. This is nothing but a shallow pretense to try and kill a direct competitor to their new product line.
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
14 months ago
What an awful move. Will Apple be removing apps that link to console games such as the GTA, Steam, Xbox, or Playstation companion apps? The official Pokemon apps encourage people to play the games on 3DS. Chromecast app better watch out too... and the Amazon app for selling music and books.

Shame on Apple.
Rating: 4 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]