Apple Faces Potential $38 Million Fine in China as $1.6 Billion Lawsuit Over 'iPad' Trademark Proceeds
iSmashPhone summarizes a pair of reports from China claiming that Apple is facing a potential 240 million yuan ($38 million) fine from governmental authorities over alleged trademark infringement involving the "iPad" name. The fine pales, however, in comparison to the $1.6 billion Proview Technology, which claims to own the name, is seeking to win in a series of lawsuits filed against Apple. Proview is also said to be seeking an apology from Apple and an injunction preventing the company from using the iPad name in China.
Proview first accused Apple of trademark infringement back in 2010, claiming that it had owned the mark in China since 2000 and seeking a settlement from Apple in the range of $800 million. Apple fired back with its own lawsuit claiming that it did own the "iPad" rights in China after having purchased European rights from Proview's parent company for just $55,000.
With Proview having filed a 10 billion yuan ($1.6 billion) suit against Apple in the meantime, Apple lost its suit when a court ruled that the Chinese rights had not been included in the purchase because the parent company did not hold the authority to sell them.
Apple is appealing the December ruling in favor of Proview, and any potential government fines or resolution to Proview's case against Apple appear to be waiting for that case to be resolved.
Proview first accused Apple of trademark infringement back in 2010, claiming that it had owned the mark in China since 2000 and seeking a settlement from Apple in the range of $800 million. Apple fired back with its own lawsuit claiming that it did own the "iPad" rights in China after having purchased European rights from Proview's parent company for just $55,000.
With Proview having filed a 10 billion yuan ($1.6 billion) suit against Apple in the meantime, Apple lost its suit when a court ruled that the Chinese rights had not been included in the purchase because the parent company did not hold the authority to sell them.
Apple is appealing the December ruling in favor of Proview, and any potential government fines or resolution to Proview's case against Apple appear to be waiting for that case to be resolved.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)18 months ago
Bringing jobs over to them and now they turn back and bite you. Ouch!!! That's how communists (China) do things.
18 months ago
Apple should troll China and not sell iPads then. Make the country will suck Apple in a moist fashion.
And when the country makes it difficult for Apple to produce iPads, iPods, iPhones, MacBook Airs, MacBook Pros, Apple TVs, etc., etc. in its factories... then what?
18 months ago
Bringing jobs over to them and now they turn back and bite you. Ouch!!! That's how communists (China) do things.
So by your reasoning, Capitalists wouldn't sue over possible trademark infringement ? That's idiots for you.
18 months ago
That's just the fine. They are asking 1.6 billion in the lawsuit itself. I think Apple loses this one.
I don't know how things work in China. In a country with an actual legal system, you have to prove actual damages. Just asking for a random $1.6B when you have only suffered $5 in actual economic damage normally doesn't work.
18 months ago
That's rich, coming from China, of all places.
Yes, the same country that copies everything they can get their hands on is now all of a sudden enforcing copyrights. LOL.
A clear money grab by a few:-(
18 months ago
$38 million? That's ashtray money.
That's just the fine. They are asking 1.6 billion in the lawsuit itself. I think Apple loses this one.
18 months ago
Why are people saying Apple bought Proview in Europe ? They simply acquired the rights to the iPad trademark from Proview's parent company, they didn't acquire the company itself.
And why is it that when Apple is found in infringement of someone else's IP, Apple should stick it to the entire world and do as it pleases but when someone infringes on Apple's IP, Apple has a god given right and duty to defend it till no one is left standing ?
This forum really needs to get its act together sometimes.
And why is it that when Apple is found in infringement of someone else's IP, Apple should stick it to the entire world and do as it pleases but when someone infringes on Apple's IP, Apple has a god given right and duty to defend it till no one is left standing ?
This forum really needs to get its act together sometimes.
[ Read All Comments ]
