Got a tip for us? Share it...

Kodak Faces Setback in Patent Case Against Apple and Research in Motion

Eastman Kodak yesterday announced that it has received an initial determination from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) rejecting its claims of patent infringement made against Apple and Research in Motion last year in relation to digital camera technology. In its decision, the ITC held the patent claim in question as invalid and thus not infringed.

Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE:EK) today announced that it has received notice that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) action brought by Kodak against Apple Inc. and Research In Motion Limited (RIM) has issued an initial determination recommending that the patent claim at issue is invalid and not infringed. The patent at issue relates to a technology invented by Kodak for previewing images on a digital camera-enabled device. This particular Kodak patent was recently confirmed as valid by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

A final ITC determination is set for May 23rd, however, and Kodak remains "extremely confident" that it will prevail in the case, noting that a separate judge had upheld the patent claim in a case against LG and Samsung and that other ITC representative bodies have also agreed that Apple and Research in Motion are in fact infringing on Kodak's patent.

Kodak filed a federal lawsuit and the ITC complaint just over a year ago and the ITC opened an inquiry into the case in February of last year. Apple filed a retaliatory countersuit against Kodak in April 2010, and the ITC agreed to hear that case a month later but has not yet issued any decision on the matter.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

17 months ago
Last time I checked, the iPhone doesn't take film - so I'm not sure what Kodak is all up in arms about.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago

Last time I checked, the iPhone doesn't take film - so I'm not sure what Kodak is all up in arms about.


Kodak invented the digital camera in 1975.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
IIRC, the patent was about how to preview an image before you take it. Quick resampling or something along those lines. Don't quote me, it's been a while since I looked at it.

Interestingly, last year the same patent resulted in LG paying Kodak a one-time fee over $400 million, and Samsung doing the same with $550 million.

No doubt Kodak thought it was going to end up the same with others. I wonder what's done differently.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago


This did not exist before 1975.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago

This did not exist before 1975.


Really now :rolleyes:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
All your Photons are belong to us!

-Kodak
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
Kodak built that for Apple.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago


Made by Kodak. :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
17 months ago
I just hate patents - I understand they are needed to protect inventions, but they are just getting abused all over the place which makes them often pointless and expensive. Either they are for not so innovative things (why the hack where they approved) or companies sue each other about things where they don't really apply. Only few cases I would see as legitimate patent cases, but that is hard to see and expensive to verify. Lawyers win, everyone else looses.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]