Ad Agencies Receiving iAd Details as Apple Looks to Hinder Rival Ad Networks
![]()
On the pricing front, Vedrashko is unable to share specifics but notes that Apple will unsurprisingly position the iAd platform as a "premium" service, offering its innovative system to those with high-quality ads who are willing to pay for the privilege.
To answer the burning question -- yes, we did talk about the price. Unfortunately, we can't share much on this either. The pricing isn't that of remnant inventory, obviously -- it is what you would expect from a premier online property. The pricing scheme struck me as very straightforward and elegant.
The report also hints at Apple's plans for targeting consumers. With access to significant amount of users' data from their devices such as iTunes content, App Store downloads, and more, Apple has a unique opportunity to build thorough profiles of its users and use behavioral targeting to more efficiently connect advertisers and consumers with similar interests.The Hill Holliday team appears to be excited by Apple's plans for iAd and the company's willingness to move beyond what has been perceived as stagnant mobile ad development from Google and others and create a true integrated advertising system within applications that can harness the power of the iPhone OS.
As Apple's iAd platform begins to spin up, however, observers are interested in how other advertising networks such as Google will be affected by the move. MediaMemo reports on another change to Apple's developer terms that has the potential to cripple competing ad networks by preventing analytics companies such as AdMob and Flurry from receiving data on customer ad usage.
As I understand it, Apple is arguing that app makers can't pass along information that incorporates each phone's "unique device identifier" to ad networks and measurement companies.
This doesn't expressly prohibit ad networks from selling ads, but it prevents them from selling targeted advertising, which is close to the same thing when it comes to mobile devices. The same problem would plague analytics companies, which might be able to compile very broad usage info about apps, but little else.
For the moment, mobile analytics companies are still trying to figure out just what the change in Apple's terms means and how they might be able to work with Apple on the issue, and it remains to be seen how things will play out.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)Consumer choice
Btw, this isn't a rhetorical question and wasn't intended to fire up the fans.
So to the extent that iAd encourages companies to provide ads that target things we actually want to know more about, this is a great improvement over the "punch the monkey" days.
In other words, under our current economic system ads are part of the landscape. Can't be helped. So might as well improve the quality and usefulness of the ads so that we are less annoyed than we are right now.
I really believe that iAds make sense if properly used! I run an advertising agency and we are advising our clients to take advantage of iAds by offering two versions of their apps: 1) free version with full functionality with iAds and 2) paid version with full functionality without iAds. This way, their customers can try the free version first and determine whether or not they want to spend the money to eliminate the ads. Since we do interactive design and are working on iPhone / iPad apps for clients, we have strongly advised against using iAds in paid apps (not something I want to be associated with at this time).
Exactly. It makes sense.
Phazer
I don't want ads on my phone, period. I pay enough for it, I expect Apple to keep away from ads, if FREE apps want to put Ads, then that is fine, but the shouldn't be allowed on paid apps.
Really, this again. Nothing is going to change with iAds. Apple isn't going to put ads on your phone. Paid apps are not going to starting putting ads in their apps now. Unless they were already doing it.
At what point is Apple's greed excessive?
the alternative is allowing google to take control of it all, and apple is left with no room to move....so its the best of 2 bads.
if ads are coming, id sure as hell rather have a well designed clean iAd than a google mis-spelled google-ad.
nobody wants ads, but free apps have to make some money from somewhere.
apple cannot allow google to start controlling the mobile space, the same way they left Microsoft control the desktop space, that would be a disaster and Jobs is hell bent on not making the same mistake twice, despite knowing he will be pissing some fans off.
[ Read All Comments ]

Analytics firm Chitika today released a report showing that by its metrics iOS has now surpassed OS X in overall web traffic share in the United States. Chitika's methodology involves an analysis...
One of the most frequent reasons for an iPhone to go on a trip to the Apple Store's Genius Bar is because of water damage. Typically, a water damaged iPhone can be replaced for a flat $199...
TheVerge's Joshua Topolsky summarizes the iPad 3 casing findings reported earlier today, but also adds his own sources regarding some details of the iPad 3.
Image from RepairLabs
As...
Last July, Apple discontinued the white MacBook from its consumer lineup, pushing consumers toward the company's popular MacBook Air line or the 13-inch MacBook Pro. The company didn't kill...
Popular iPhone Twitter client Tweetbot has finally arrived on the iPad, with a user interface instantly familiar to any current Tweetbot user. Designed for the Twitter power-user, Tweetbot packs a...