Got a tip for us? Share it...

Intel Update: MacBook Airs Get Penryn, MacBooks and Pros Get Montevina Benefits

Intel's processor and chipset codenames have long been a source of confusion, and the adoption of NVIDIA's chipset in the newest MacBooks and MacBook Pros won't help matters.

One of the updates that had been long anticipated for the late 2008 MacBook and MacBook Pro updates has been the adoption of Intel's Montevina platform. This topic got lost with all the recent rumors of hardware redesigns and the adoption of NVIDIA's chipsets.

Despite Apple's migration to NVIDIA chipsets, Apple has still adopted the key advantages of the Montevina platform. This primarily includes a 1066MHz front side bus and the latest Penryn processors. How much of a difference (if any) the higher bus speeds have will have to wait for side-by-side benchmark testing, though the graphics performance of the new NVIDIA GPUs should give the new notebooks a clear graphical advantage.

This likely doesn't change anything for future planning as Apple will certainly adopt Intel's upcoming Nehalem processors over time. Nehalem is expected to offer a dramatic performance boost over existing processors. These next-generation Intel processors will be first launched for servers in Q4 2008, and come to desktop and mobile platforms in 2009.

Meanwhile, Intel confirms that Apple has quietly replaced the processors in the MacBook Air with the latest 45nm Penryn processors.

But new Intel processors did make a debut in the refresh of the MacBook Air. Instead of the Small-Form-Factor (SFF) 65-nanometer Merom chips, Apple has gone with with the more advanced 45-nanometer Penryn SSF processor. Penryn chips typically boast either 3MB or 6MB of cache memory versus the 2MB or 4MB that the older mobile procesors offer. (Cache memory speeds performance.)

The MacBook Air's processors now carry 6MB of cache memory (up from 3MB) and use a more power-efficient design. Apple had previously been using a custom 65-nm Merom chip. Any power savings from the new processors, however, may be offset by the adoption of the NVIDIA graphics card as Apple has not advertised any benefits to the change.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

43 months ago
Nice info on the AIR. The 1.8/128GB SSD AIR . . . probably the only laptop I would buy out of todays update. Love my 1.6/80 *most* of the time. ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Think I'll wait for the Nehalem MacBook, hopefully in the Spring :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
I would not expext Nahalem to arive befor late 2009 into Macs...

I just called Apple Support line to ask about a full spec of machine but ... THEY did not KNOW :mad: about a processor model and if Hybrid SLI work in new MAc BOOK Pros.

So I am asking you, will it ??

The other thing is people are complaing about Pros to be not for Pros any more. People it still is a Pro machine. Just think about 4GB of DDR3 and what boost you get out of it !!

Glossy display, ok it is crap but glossy LED dispaly is not that bad even for pro desigers !!

Overall I think it is a good update in a line...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

Think I'll wait for the Nehalem MacBook, hopefully in the Spring :)


Agreed. Although, wan't Penryn meant to offer a 'significant' jump on previous gen too?:confused:

,
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Yea, the 4GB DDR3 ram is going to be nice. I figure in Jan. at WWDC 09, they will introduce the option to go higher, 6/8GB because it wont be until Snow Leopard that we will really be able to reap the benefits of 4+GB ram.

WWDC 09' will be all about Snow Leopard and maybe minor speed bumps. Maybe also new processors for the Mac Pros.

I think the mbp and mb wont be updated again until fall 09 and maybe even then well begin to see the i7 processors.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Is the new processor still a SSF one?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

Agreed. Although, wan't Penryn meant to offer a 'significant' jump on previous gen too?:confused:

,


... yeah. Its worth thinking about that isn't it. I think better power efficiency is some thing to most look forward to rather than 'significant' performance jumps. Even Longer lasting laptops - cool.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
Refurb 2.5Ghz / 6M chace / 800Ghz FSB/ 5400rpm HD / 512 vram / DDR2

New 2.4Ghz / 3M chace / 1066Ghz FSB/ 7200rpm HD / 256 vram / DDR3

Wich machine will run faster in your opinion ?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago

Refurb 2.5Ghz / 6M chace / 800Ghz FSB/ 5400rpm HD / 512 vram / DDR2

New 2.4Ghz / 3M chace / 1066Ghz FSB/ 7200rpm HD / 256 vram / DDR3

Wich machine will run faster in your opinion ?


I am thinking a dell or hp at this point in time.....
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
43 months ago
So when they say "Nehalem is expected to offer a dramatic performance boost over existing processors", how dramatic are we talking exactly? Because I definitely want to replace my Macbook with a Macbook Pro, it would just make my life much easier. However, it isn't an absolute necessity, so if we're talking an improvement like going from the G5 to Intel was, then I can wait, but if it's just mildly faster processors that are getting hyped up then it's not worth it, I don't think.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]