New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

FCC Votes in Favor of Net Neutrality Rules, Classifies Broadband Service as a Utility

FCCThe U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted in favor by a 3-to-2 decision to enforce net neutrality rules that it claims will help protect freedom of expression and innovation on the Internet, reports Ars Technica. The FCC ruling classifies broadband service as a utility and prevents Internet providers from blocking or throttling traffic or offering prioritized service through so-called Internet "fast lanes" for payment.
"The Internet is the most powerful and pervasive platform on the planet. It is simply too important to be left without rules and without a referee on the field," said FCC chairman Tom Wheeler. "Think about it. The Internet has replaced the functions of the telephone and the post office. The Internet has redefined commerce, and as the outpouring from four million Americans has demonstrated, the Internet is the ultimate vehicle for free expression. The Internet is simply too important to allow broadband providers to be the ones making the rules."
The ruling will reclassify fixed and mobile broadband as a telecommunications service, and Internet providers will be regulated under Title II of the Communications Act. The decision was heavily contested by Internet service providers such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon, which could sue the FCC in an attempt to reverse the new rules. FCC officials believe that Type II reclassification will give them more legal authority to prevent net neutrality rules from being overturned.

While the new requirements are intended to ensure that the Internet remains fast, fair and open, the FCC did not follow through with last-mile unbundling that would have required Internet service providers to sell wholesale access to their networks. That decision would have allowed new competitors to enter local markets and sell broadband service using the existing infrastructure of larger providers such as Comcast and Time Warner Cable.
"But the FCC decided not to impose unbundling," adds Ars Technica. "As such, the vote does little to boost Internet service competition in cities or towns. But it's an attempt to prevent incumbent ISPs from using their market dominance to harm online providers, including those who offer services that compete against the broadband providers' voice and video services."
The FCC's order on Thursday could be faced with legal challenges and action from Congress, according to the report, suggesting that debate surrounding net neutrality is far from over. The new rules will go into effect 60 days after being published in the U.S. Federal Register, although the Office of Management and Budget will continue to manage enhancements to the transparency rule.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)

16 months ago

Newsflash, Barack Obama is the worst President in U.S. history, has singlehandedly done more damage than good, and the country may take anywhere from 10-25 years to recover from his 8 years of corruption, if it can at all. At a point in history when so many things in this world are at crucial turning points, we have possibly gone into the dark ages of American Communism.




LOL thanks, I needed a good laugh.
Rating: 35 Votes
16 months ago
Net Neutrality is used as a power grab. This does not help us as consumers. It hurts us. Just another way for the current administration to tell you what to do and what's in your best interest. This is just step one.
Rating: 35 Votes
16 months ago

Net Neutrality is used as a power grab. This does not help us as consumers. It hurts us. Just another way for the current administration to tell you what to do and what's in your best interest. This is just step one.


Please elaborate.
Rating: 34 Votes
16 months ago

Thats a shame. Lets hope the courts again take the sane position restrain this federal overreach.


Not going to happen. The Court that ruled the FCC lacked authority under the previous classification already acknowledged in their ruling that the FCC does have the power to reclassify under Title II and thus enforce net neutrality rules.

How is it an example of federal overreach? The Internet is global. It significantly affects interstate commerce. The Federal Government is the only entity in the U.S. that can effectively protect it.

Newsflash, Barack Obama is the worst President in U.S. history, has singlehandedly done more damage than good, and the country may take anywhere from 10-25 years to recover from his 8 years of corruption, if it can at all. At a point in history when so many things in this world are at crucial turning points, we have possibly gone into the dark ages of American Communism.


It didn't take long to mention the 'C' word. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Rating: 30 Votes
16 months ago

I bet 99.9% of the U.S. population has zero idea of what this FCC ruing really means or how it will affect them personally. That includes me.


Put it this way: Comcast owns NBC Universal and its programming. So when you're streaming Parks and Recreation reruns on Hulu, complete with advertising, they're making money from you. They're not going to do anything to hinder your Hulu streaming experience.

You watch one episode, get bored, and decide to start browsing MacRumors. Comcast has no stake in MR and makes no money off of it. Without Net Neutrality, they could slow down access to MR to the point where you're like "Damn, this site is completely unusable. I guess it's back to watching Parks and Rec" - unless you pay more for unrestricted access to sites. Or if MacRumors paid a ransom to Comcast to unrestrict their site for all Comcast customers.

No NN would almost allow them to set up speed tiers for different sites: You would get 50 MBPS for Hulu and anything else that makes Comcast money. 25 MBPS for Netflix because Netflix paid a ransom to Comcast. 10 MBPS for Twitter because Twitter also paid a ransom (but not as big as what Netflix paid). 5 MBPS for almost everything else. 3 MBPS for Amazon because Amazon told Comcast to take their ransom request and shove it up their arse, which angered Comcast, 1 MBPS for Skype because it competes with Comcast's landline services, and dial up speeds for AT&T and Verizon's site because they don't want you checking out the competition's pricing.
Rating: 29 Votes
16 months ago
This is insane. They can't keep themselves from regulating anything...
Rating: 26 Votes
16 months ago
GOOD! Consumer wins! Greed loses.
Net Neutrality is fair and here to stay!
Rating: 26 Votes
16 months ago

Newsflash, Forbes magazine is a hack only looking out for the bottom line of corporations and could careless about customers.


Newsflash, Barack Obama is the worst President in U.S. history, has singlehandedly done more damage than good, and the country may take anywhere from 10-25 years to recover from his 8 years of corruption, if it can at all. At a point in history when so many things in this world are at crucial turning points, we have possibly gone into the dark ages of American Communism.
Rating: 25 Votes
16 months ago
Get ready for your Internet service fees to go through the roof (FCC "fees"), your privacy to be invaded ("regulated") and monitored by government at all times and your free speech rights to go completely out the window in favor of concepts like "You can't yell FIRE on the Internet!" and your "real identity" must be used at ALL times or you will fined into oblivion.

You see all this crap is under the pretense of a reasonable idea (i.e. net neutrality), but in REALITY, it means they will now go FAR FAR beyond just that one issue and eventually regulate every aspect of your online life. It may actually be a good time for someone to roll out a "private" alternative to the Internet that is NOT connected to it. It would also be easier to control in terms of hacking since you could not just get access anywhere on the planet.

What exactly did we win? I haven't heard much about this...


"We" didn't win anything. People who think they got something here have no idea the Pandora Box they opened. They will be able to regulate content and as Mark said, "decency standards". They can make porn sites 100% illegal. They can make Showtime and HBO illegal. They could require everything to be sanitized like over-the-air TV. They could make it so you can't get high-speed Internet because everyone has to have "equal" speeds. Everyone stuck at the lowest common denominator. It could be like the Communist Russia of Internet.
Rating: 24 Votes
16 months ago

GOOD! Consumer wins! Greed loses.
Net Neutrality is fair and here to stay!


You can pretty much bet that if it's bad for Big Telecom then it's good for us.

Now the lawsuits begin.


If only I lived in some utopian dreamworld and believed that. This ruling is bad for the consumer. As are so many 'regulations'. Do some homework and find out the reality of it.
Rating: 22 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]