New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Reviews of the Fifth-Generation iPod Touch and Seventh-Generation iPod Nano

With Apple having just begun shipping out its new fifth-generation iPod touch and seventh-generation iPod nano, The Verge has already posted reviews of both devices, weighing the positives and negatives of the substantially redesigned iPods.

The Verge's iPod touch review notes that the device is a major upgrade over its predecessor, which essentially dated to September 2010, with across the board changes in display, processor, and camera all housed in a sleek new body.
When you finally get it out of its impossible-to-open plastic packaging, it almost feels like you left part of it behind. It really is only a quarter-inch thick, though, and it really does weigh only 3.1 ounces. Remarkably, it doesn’t feel cheap or flimsy — it’s certainly a far cry from the incredible craftsmanship of the iPhone 5, but its aluminum back panel still feels quite solid and the slightly rounded edges are comfortable in your hand.
The move to using the same 4-inch display found in the iPhone 5 is a huge upgrade for the iPod touch, given that the previous model used a display that was inferior to the one used in the iPhone 4, albeit still of Retina resolution. As for the new 5-megapixel camera in the iPod touch, The Verge found that it performs adequately for still photos and "gets the job done" for 1080p video, but still falls short of even point-and-shoot camera quality.


Overall, The Verge found a lot to like about the new iPod touch, but questions whether the $299 starting price is enough to really entice customers given Apple's history of positioning the device as a "gateway drug" into the iOS ecosystem.
With no cheaper entry-level option, the touch is far from an impulse purchase. Selling the last-generation model for $199 isn’t a good compromise, either: it has a terrible camera, a much worse screen, and seriously outdated internals. If you’re looking for a device like the iPod touch, buying this year's model is an absolute no-brainer, but I’d bet more people are going to think twice before laying out $300.
In its iPod nano review, The Verge came away noting how hard it was to write a review about a device that doesn't do much more than play audio files. The lack of support for iOS features such as iCloud syncing leaves users stuck in the traditional iPod setup of having to manage their music files via iTunes, a concept dating back over decade.
You want to listen to music with an iPod nano? Then you better get ready to open iTunes and plug in a cable and transfer some hot nasty files. It’s like taking a time machine to 2010, before Apple itself started pushing everyone away from files and towards iCloud.

If you’re cool with managing files, the new iPod nano is the best dedicated music player on the market. It’s the sort of product that only Apple can make; a seamless slice of metal and plastic that feels essentially inevitable once you hold it.

In its wrap-up, The Verge reiterates its view that the iPod nano is hampered by a lack of many of the features that have brought significant improvements to the iPhone and iPod touch, pointing to Apple's new Lightning connector as an example of missed opportunities.
When [Phil Schiller] introduced the smaller Lightning connector last month, he noted that “so many of the things we used to do over the wire, we now do wirelessly.” After listing Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, what did Schiller describe as “best of all”? Oh, that’s right. “With iCloud, we can download all our content wirelessly.” The new nano might have Apple’s connector of the future, but everything else about it clings tightly to the past — to a world in which iTunes is still the center of the digital media universe, not a bloated relic badly in need of a fresh start and new ideas.
When it comes down to it, The Verge suggests that the iPod nano's $149 price tag will limit its market to those consumers interested in the cheapest available iPod with a screen or for whom size and weight is a major consideration, with a $50 jump to the fourth-generation iPod touch making more sense for many consumers.

Related roundups: iPod nano, iPod touch

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

29 months ago
spiderman has nice ass
Rating: 101 Votes
29 months ago
The iPod Nano was actually much cooler when it was small and you could use it like a watch. Actually I think they should have made it even smaller and more watch-like. I wouldn't be surprised if the Nano line is totally killed off next year...Apple has run out of ideas for it.
Rating: 33 Votes
29 months ago

Both these products are horrible.

Apple is making it very hard for me to spend my money at the moment!


If you think the new touch is horrible, you have poor taste my friend.
Rating: 25 Votes
29 months ago

this one ?

Image (http://foshiznik.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/apple-ipod-nano-4g.jpg)


its was the best one imho

no this one is the best


:cool:
Rating: 24 Votes
29 months ago
The iPod touch is priced way to high, $299 for a device with last years specs? I don't think so
Rating: 23 Votes
29 months ago

you mean the 3rd gen right?



this one ?




its was the best one imho
Rating: 18 Votes
29 months ago

wow - what a spoiled little brat.

go get her a book not a $400 device.


Hey, she is not a spoiled brat if anything you're just an person that judges everything. She has books and those devices were given to her by her baby sitter and my cousin. Just because someone has something you didn't have as a child doesn't mean that they're a brat.
Rating: 14 Votes
29 months ago

Hey she is not a spoiled brat if anything you're just an person that judges everything.She has books and those devices were given to her by her baby sitter and my cousin. Just because someone has something you didn't have as a child doesn't mean that their a brat.


I agree. This board is littered with ignorant people. Just ignore them.
Rating: 10 Votes
29 months ago
The 4th gen iPod nano remains the best design by far. 5th/6th was worse, and this is worse still.
Rating: 9 Votes
29 months ago

Sometimes I feel like some people have no considerations for other people.
I don't think my 6 year old niece would need a phone but she has an iPod touch and an iPod nano that she uses a lot.


Too young for such devices imo
Rating: 9 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]