Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Targeted in New Patent Suit Over VPN on iOS

Patent holding firm VirnetX yesterday announced that it has filed suit against Apple, Cisco, NEC, and Aastra, alleging infringement of five patents held by the company. As noted by Computerworld, Apple is being targeted for claimed infringement by the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch of a pair of patents related to virtual private networking (VPN) connectivity.

VirnetX, which derives almost all of its revenue from licensing fees and legal judgments related to its patent portfolio, previously sued Microsoft over similar violations, with the two companies reaching a settlement in May that saw Microsoft pay VirnetX $200 million and license the intellectual property in question. One of the two patents Apple is alleged to have infringed upon is that same as one cited in the Microsoft case.

Wednesday's suit claimed that Apple's iPhone -- all models, including the newest iPhone 4 -- iPod Touch and iPad infringed a pair of VirnetX patents.

One of the two that Apple allegedly infringed -- identified as Patent No. 6,502,135 -- was also one of the pair that VirnetX said Microsoft violated.

The patent cited in both lawsuits, titled "Agile network protocol for secure communications with assured system availability," describes technologies for creating and managing a virtual private networking (VPN) connection.

The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, a popular location for patent cases known for its plaintiff-friendly judgments. The judge in the case, Leonard Davis, also presided over the Microsoft case and is particularly known for his willingness to rule in favor of plaintiffs in patent disputes.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

20 months ago


VirnetX, which derives almost all of its revenue from licensing fees and legal judgments related to its patent portfolio, previously sued Microsoft over similar violations, with the two companies reaching a settlement in May that saw Microsoft pay VirnetX $200 million and license the intellectual property in question.


Someone opened the cage doors for patent trolls lately.....
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
I should start patenting all my dreams... that one day I can sue someone.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

Someone opened the cage doors for patent trolls lately.....


They've been flowing for years, but there's been a cluster of 'em recently which have been more widely reported. I feel fortunate that I'll never work for, or come close to working for, these types of patent-chasing companies -- what a way to make a living.

(And I posted a joke about the amount of legal news today, and it got *moderated*? Geez guys, lighten up!)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Well then, at least apple isn't alone. :)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Funny friday obviously, anyone else want to sue Apple while we're at it?
Maybe you invented the computer? Or a means to store data electronically?

Contact your local lawyer...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Software patents.. real PITA.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago

Someone opened the cage doors for patent trolls lately.....


Yup, your friendly local congress critter.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Multi millionaire judge L.D.? ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Thier lawyers must have been on vacation during the same quarter last year:

[LIST]
[*]Profitable second quarter 2010 with $200,023,392 in revenues vs. $7,207 in second quarter 2009
[*]Income from operations of $115,101,373 in second quarter 2010 vs. ($3,928,346) in second quarter 2009.
[*]Net income of $81,112,974 in second quarter 2010 vs. ($3,927,102) in second quarter 2009.
[*]Earnings per share of $1.83 in second quarter 2010 vs. ($0.11) in second quarter 2009.
[*]Special dividend of $0.50 per common share declared in second quarter 2010.
[*]Cash flow from operating activities of $76,656,936 for first six months of 2010 vs. (7,330,109) for first six months of 2009.
[*]Cash and cash equivalents of $127,179,912 as of June 30, 2010 vs. $414,735 as of December 31, 2009.
[/LIST]
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
20 months ago
Patent trolls should be killed, murdered and killed!

The patent should be void if you haven't incorporated it into whatever it is you do.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]