Apple Wins Permanent Injunction Against Psystar
1. Copying, selling, offering to sell, distributing, or creating derivative works of plaintiff's copyrighted Mac OS X software without authorization from the copyright holder;
2. Intentionally inducing, aiding, assisting, abetting, or encouraging any other person or entity to infringe plaintiff's copyrighted Mac OS X software;
3. Circumventing any technological measure that effectively controls access to plaintiff's copyrighted Mac OS X software, including, but not limited to, the technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers;
4. Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to plaintiff's copyrighted Mac OS X software, including, but not limited to, the technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers;
5. Manufacturing, importing, offering to the public, providing, or otherwise trafficking in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively protects the rights held by plaintiff under the Copyright Act with respect to its copyrighted Mac OS X software.
Psystar made headlines back in April when it started advertising unauthorized Mac OS X compatible PCs. Apple subsequently sued Psystar on grounds of copyright infringement as well as DMCA claims. Apple had won summary judgement in November.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)Alsup said he did so because Psystar's statements to the court avoided saying specifically what Rebel EFI does
More evasive BS chicanery from Psystar. These fools will go to any length to waste everyone's time.
"Whether such a defense would be successful on the merits, or face preclusion or other hurdles, this order cannot predict," Alsup said. "What is certain, however, is that until such a motion is brought, Psystar will be selling Rebel EFI at its peril, and risks finding itself in contempt if its new venture falls within the scope of the injunction."
Good enough, for now, but it just prolongs this fiasco. it seems the Revel EFI issue isn't quite decided yet because Psystar evidently withheld information about it.
Finally.... Our long, national nightmare is over.
Will this stop them? They always seem to find an outlet and keep selling their junk rather than listening to the courts...
Surely such behaviour should get them in more trouble?
It can't have been to sell clones; maybe to bilk investors out of money, hence their wildly inflated sales projects? Maybe it was just publicity, like white House crashers and balloon boy? Whatever happened to Apple's contention that there was someone behind the curtain funding them, a' la' SCO?
There's more to this.
It will be interesting to find out who the financial backers were. When will we find this out?
I would also like to know! However I bet the next thing that is coming is bankruptcy coming the Psystar.
It will be interesting to find out who the financial backers were. When will we find this out?
No idea 'ay? They had millions though... enough to mount some pretty high-level court cases across multiple states, and also to keep manufacturing, marketing and presumably selling machines (despite not making a cent from their company.)
My guess is that somebody must have helped them...
Not to mention the fact that I gave up on hackintosh a long while ago... hence the sig :D
I would also like to know! However I bet the next thing that is coming is bankruptcy coming the Psystar.
They tried that before, but bankruptcy required Psystar to reveal all of its backers, so somehow it reversed out of bankruptcy.
[ Read All Comments ]

Our sister-site TouchArcade notes that Chillingo's excellent physics puzzler Feed Me Oil is free today for both the iPhone and iPad. It's normally $0.99 for iPhone and $1.99 for iPad....
Several years ago, Comcast began instituting bandwidth caps of 250GB per month on its residential customers. In 2008, this was plenty for most customers, but with the advent of streaming video...
Reuters reports that China Mobile Chairman Xi Guohua has once again publicly stated that the world's largest mobile phone carrier is engaged in talks with Apple about offering the iPhone to its...
Apple has filed a motion to dismiss in a case filed by customers over alleged misleading advertising depicting the Siri technology in the iPhone 4S. The lawsuit, filed in March, alleges that...
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI) today released its latest rankings of customer satisfaction in the United States for mobile phones and a number of products and services, with the new...