Got a tip for us? Share it...

Low Power Multicore PowerPCs?

eWeek reports on a startup company which is working on a new family of low-power, multicore, PowerPC architecture processors due in 2006.

The company, P.A. Semi, plans to start by introducing a dual core 2GHz processor with a 13 watt typical power consumption. The new chips are designed "from the ground up to be miserly with power".

"There isn't a silver bullet to solve the power problem. You just have to have it as a priority all through the design process," Hayter said. "We've applied the methodology whereby if a part of the chip isn't being used, we won't clock it."


The first chips are due in the 3rd quarter of 2006. Meanwhile, Apple plans to start the move from PowerPC processors to the Intel processor architecture by June 2006.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

82 months ago


Category: News and Press Releases
Link: Startup Puts a Twist on PowerPC

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
Let's play a game. :D

Rewrite this sentence using proper grammar/english so that it makes sense:

The Silicon Valley chip startup, run by chip legend Dan Dobberpuhl—Dobberpuhl, its CEO, presided over the development of the Alpha processor while at Digital Equipment Corp.—lifted its veil of secrecy Monday.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

Let's play a game. :D

Rewrite this sentence using proper grammar/english so that it makes sense:

This isn't too hard. The problem with it is immediately obvious to me.

Here's the original:

The Silicon Valley chip startup, run by chip legend Dan Dobberpuhl—Dobberpuhl, its CEO, presided over the development of the Alpha processor while at Digital Equipment Corp.—lifted its veil of secrecy Monday.


Here's my modified version:

The Silicon Valley chip startup, run by chip legend Dan Dobberpuhl (Dobberpuhl, its CEO, presided over the development of the Alpha processor while at Digital Equipment Corp.) lifted its veil of secrecy Monday.


There's still one problem with it - what does the "its" in "its CEO" refer to?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

There's still one problem with it - what does the "its" in "its CEO" refer to?



The company AFAIK. :confused:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
This PPC report is interesting because I do hope the PPC has a nice future ahead of it. But this doesn't sound relevant to Macs directly: nothing is coming any time soon, and when it does, it will be targeted to devices other than computers.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
Don't tell me have we the wrong timing.....

In 2007 Apple, just after finishing its PPC >> Intel switch, will do an Intel >> PPC transition. The new ultra-low powerconsumption PPC chips forced the decision.
Steve comments: "Well, it's better to switch back immediately while all the developers stlll have their PPC code".

:p :D

Edit: must-remember-to-change-avatar (and corrected errors...)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
Sounds like they are just a bit too late for Macs. If they are successful, it will make me very sad. The PPC architechture is so much better than the X86. PPC has almost kept up with x86 with a small percentage of the money thrown at it. Now, if they had just done it two years ago...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
The first chips are due in the 3rd quarter of 2006. Meanwhile, Apple plans to move to the Intel processor architecture by June 2006.

Whoops!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago
I wonder how these will compare performance and power consumption wise to Intel's offerings when they are released. Switching to Intel is a lot of work. I hope it was the right decision and remains the best option because Intel stays on the ball with development. I also hope that all software gets ported quickly. Rosetta looked nice but I would prefer to skip it entirely if possible.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
82 months ago

Sounds like they are just a bit too late for Macs. If they are successful, it will make me very sad. The PPC architechture is so much better than the X86. PPC has almost kept up with x86 with a small percentage of the money thrown at it. Now, if they had just done it two years ago...


How is it better? x86 has always been faster and more advanced. Just look at Centrino vs PPC Laptop chips...

Let's get rid of this smoke screen technology once and for all.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]