Got a tip for us? Share it...

Lawsuit Over AT&T's iPhone Exclusivity Gains Class Action Status


Late last week, Wired reported that a lawsuit filed against Apple and AT&T over the carrier's exclusivity arrangement for the iPhone has received class action status, meaning that it now automatically covers every iPhone customer in the United States.

In an interview Friday with Wired.com, Mark Rifkin, lead counsel representing the plaintiffs of the suit, highlighted that the terms of AT&T's two-year customer contract say that customers have the option to terminate whenever they wish for a fee to switch to another carrier.

By only offering the iPhone on one carrier, iPhone customers are still essentially locked in despite having the termination option, the suit argues.

Playing a significant role in the lawsuit has been the disclosure in documents related to the case that AT&T's exclusivity agreement with Apple was originally scheduled to last five years from the device's 2007 launch, or into 2012. The plaintiffs have argued that even customers fulfilling their two-year contracts with AT&T for the iPhone are unable to switch carriers and continue using their handsets, effectively locking them in to AT&T for longer than their signed contract unless they are willing to switch phones.

In a response filed by Apple's legal team in 2008, Apple claimed the allegations of monopoly were contrived.

"[T]here was widespread disclosure of [AT&T's] five-year exclusivity and no suggestion by Apple or anyone else that iPhones would become unlocked after two years," Apple said in a response. "Moreover, it is sheer speculation - and illogical - that failing to disclose the five-year exclusivity term would produce monopoly power."

Some observers have pointed to the original five-year exclusivity agreement between Apple and AT&T as evidence that the iPhone will not be making an appearance on Verizon or any other U.S. carrier in the near future. Multiple sources have indicated in recent years, however, that the exclusivity agreement is for a significantly shorter period of time, possibly expiring this year and opening the door for the iPhone to make its way to competing carriers. Even if the original agreement did call for a five-year exclusivity period as detailed by USA Today in 2007 and confirmed in the court documents associated with this case, it is certainly possible that Apple and AT&T have renegotiated their agreement such that more recent reports of shorter timeframes are accurate.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

21 months ago
Oh this is interesting.

The plaintiffs have argued that even customers fulfilling their two-year contracts with AT&T for the iPhone are unable to switch carriers and continue using their handsets, effectively locking them in to AT&T for longer than their signed contract unless they are willing to switch phones.

That's a big reason why I don't like the iPhone. Basically turns it into an iPod when your contract is up. :) And besides, AT&T's new data plans are terrible so I bet a lot of people are going to sign up for his lawsuit.... and hope they can jump ship to Verizon.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
I think they said in the beginning, that they would unlock your iPhone after your contract was over. I never knew if that came to be true. If so, there would be no argument.
Does anyone know about this?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
Isn't is just wonderful that all iPhone customers may eventually, after five years of litigation get a $5 coupon to buy AT&T accessories for their iPhones, while the class action lawyers pocket millions?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
I think that this is ridiculous! I understand that people want to be able to use their phone on any network, but come on. I think 2 companies should be able to enter into an exclusive contract if they can both agree on the terms. Everyone knew the exclusivity was set for 5 years why gripe? This is EXACTLY like if a car manufacture wanted to sell their car with a specific tire and you could only buy that tire with the car. Point is: JAILBREAK THE DAMN iPHONE!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
I just want my phone unlocked.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
You can't bitch about exclusivity, etc. b/c you don't like the carrier or want it on a different network when Verizon had first crack and turned it down, Apple had to develop Visual Voicemail with the carrier, and Verizon doesn't even support the use of Apps that require a connection while you are on a call, one of the key features to using an iPhone. Apple has partnered with multiple carriers in other countries and will most likely do so in the U.S. at some point in the next 2 years, maybe even coinciding with the launch of 4G/LTE networks which are rumored to put an end to the CDMA vs GSM dichotomy.

Get over it. People look for any angle to class action and lawyers love the publicity.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
And when can I order a Big Mac at Burger King?!!?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
Still dumbest lawsuit ever.

Now dumbest lawsuit ever to achieve class action status.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
The entire cell-phone industry is price-gouging. "Data is gold".
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
21 months ago
Wow, class action lawsuit for the exclusivity of the iphone with AT&T. Well..... all I can say is, United States of America!!!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]