Got a tip for us? Share it...

Published Blacklist Blocks Core Location Only?

DaringFireball.net clarifies that the published blacklist url likely only blocks malicious apps from accessing the iPhone's Core Location functions. Core Location allows applications to detect the user's location through GPS and Wi-Fi triangulation.

An informed source at Apple confirmed to me that the clbl in the URL stands for Core Location Blacklist, and that it does just that. It is not a blacklist for disabling apps completely, but rather specifically for preventing any listed apps from accessing Core Location an API which, for obvious privacy reasons, is covered by very strict rules in the iPhone SDK guidelines.

This being said, this doesn't change the fact that Apple has suggested they can disable Applications remotely:

Since each iPhone program will be digitally signed by its creator, this gives Apple the ability to turn off the spigot, as Steve Jobs put it, and revoke programs that dont meet its standards.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

46 months ago
This will make all the people that were complaining about the disabling of apps somewhat happy, hopefully. But to be honest, Apple still should be able to disable any apps that are malicious, I wouldn't want any app that will invade my privacy on my phone or iPod.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
or they could just not let people instantly purchase an item by pressing "buy now" button.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
i don't see how this changes anything.

they can still disable whatever apps they choose....
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

This will make all the people that were complaining about the disabling of apps somewhat happy, hopefully. But to be honest, Apple still should be able to disable any apps that are malicious, I wouldn't want any app that will invade my privacy on my phone or iPod.


Nope. Back to a lack of MMS and video recording for them. For you see, if you build a machine that turns water into wine, unless it has MMS, it is bull puckey.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
Makes sense, one of the core concepts of digital signatures is the concept of revocation.

Revoke an app - you can disable it if the other end checks for revocation.

But to disable bits of functionality? That'd require some sort of hack like this list of files thing that Apple have implemented.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

Apple still should be able to disable any apps that are malicious, I wouldn't want any app that will invade my privacy on my phone or iPod.


You mean an application such as one that can see what applications you have on your phone and the ability for it to disable them ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

or they could just not let people instantly purchase an item by pressing "buy now" button.


They could create a good separation between what is free and what you buy. I think that would be a nice behavior. Ok, I know that it is not so beautiful, but would improve it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

i don't see how this changes anything.

they can still disable whatever apps they choose....


No, this theoretically means they can disable CoreLocation in any apps they choose. There's a big difference!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago

No, this theoretically means they can disable CoreLocation in any apps they choose. There's a big difference!

Well, if this is true, and Steve Jobs isn't lying, they can do both.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
46 months ago
See what happens when you get all worked up over something without having all the facts? :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]