New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

iPhone Slowdown Lawsuits Ordered to Be Centralized in Northern California District Court

Apple's legal battle against dozens of iPhone slowdown class action lawsuits will take place in a courtroom near its headquarters.


The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation today disclosed it has ordered [PDF] all iPhone slowdown lawsuits to be transferred to the U.S. District Court for Northern California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Edward J. Davila for consolidated pretrial proceedings.

More than half of the 61 lawsuits—and counting—were filed in the Northern District of California to begin with, so centralization of the remaining complaints filed in other states should help to streamline the legal process.

An excerpt from the order:
These actions share factual questions arising from allegations that Apple included code in updates to its mobile operating system (iOS) that significantly reduced the performance of older-model iPhones. Plaintiffs also allege that Apple misrepresented the nature of the iOS updates and failed to adequately disclose to iPhone owners the impact the iOS updates would have on the performance of their iPhones.

Discovery regarding the engineering of the iPhone and the iOS updates likely will be technical and complex. Plaintiffs assert similar causes of action for false advertising, alleged unfair business practices, trespass to chattels, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. Moreover, plaintiffs bring these actions on behalf of overlapping putative classes of iPhone owners.
The first lawsuit was filed in late December, after Apple revealed that it throttles the maximum performance of some older iPhone models with chemically aged batteries when necessary in order to prevent the devices from unexpectedly shutting down. The changes were first introduced in iOS 10.2.1.

Apple didn't mention the change when iOS 10.2.1 was first released, and in a statement issued a month later, it still only mentioned vague "improvements" resulting in a significant reduction in unexpected shutdowns.

Apple only revealed exactly what the so-called "improvements" were after Primate Labs founder John Poole visualized that some iPhone 6s and iPhone 7 devices suddenly had lower benchmark scores starting with iOS 10.2.1 and iOS 11.2 respectively, despite operating at maximum performance on previous versions.

Apple apologized for its lack of communication in December, and reduced the price of battery replacements to $29 for iPhone 6 and newer through the end of 2018. Apple also released iOS 11.3 earlier this week with a new feature that enables users to track their iPhone battery's health and performance status.

Moreover, when users first install iOS 11.3, all performance management features that might have been enabled are automatically disabled. If an unexpected shutdown occurs, however, the performance management is turned back on and must be disabled manually thereafter—although Apple doesn't recommend it.

In addition to the lawsuits, Apple has also faced questions from government officials and consumer protection groups in the United States, Canada, France, South Korea, and a handful of other countries.

We've already answered many frequently asked questions about Apple's power management process, which can be avoided entirely by replacing your iPhone's battery if necessary. Read our guide on how to get an iPhone's battery replaced at an Apple Store or Apple Authorized Service Provider.

Related Roundups: iPhone 7, iPhone SE


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

3 weeks ago
Can't wait to claim my piece of the pie! All $3.14 of it.
Rating: 24 Votes
3 weeks ago
Nobody is going to benefit from these lawsuits except the attorneys. Class actions for minor defects in consumer goods are such a colossal waste of time and court resources.
Rating: 12 Votes
3 weeks ago
Go get em!

Think it's bad now? Just wait until those Apple chips start going in your $3k Mac and they suddenly slow down after 3 years.
Rating: 11 Votes
3 weeks ago
90% of the time judges are biased towards their country/city. Couldn't they have the lawsuit take place more to the north, say around Redmond? :p
Rating: 11 Votes
3 weeks ago

Go get em!

Think it's bad now? Just wait until those Apple chips start going in your $3k Mac and they suddenly slow down after 3 years.

Except this has to do with batteries, not processors.
Rating: 9 Votes
3 weeks ago

You might want to let Apple know. According to them, your battery controls your processor, so it's related. Bad Macbook Pro battery? Good luck rendering that 4k video sucker.


That’s just low quality trolling.

Plug the MacBook Pro into a power adapter, and render away.

Do you know anything about how computers work?
Rating: 9 Votes
3 weeks ago

Nobody is going to benefit from these lawsuits except the attorneys. Class actions for minor defects in consumer goods are such a colossal waste of time and court resources.

A benefit is not always of a monetary kind. If Apple are forced to stop this BS, then I as a user both new and existing will benefit from this lawsuit.
Rating: 9 Votes
3 weeks ago
These lawsuits are an example of what America has become.
Rating: 8 Votes
3 weeks ago
That is positive news for Apple. They will get a judge and jury sympathetic to the hometown company (if it goes to trial).
Rating: 7 Votes
3 weeks ago
Lawsuits over this?

This is why we can't have nice things.
Rating: 6 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]