Got a tip for us? Share it...

Prominent Accountants Blast Apple's $1.99 802.11n Upgrade Reasoning

Some sites have been picking up on a recent Wall Street Journal article (paid subscription required) that quoted prominent accountants disregarding Apple's stated reasons for charging $1.99 for enabling 802.11n capability on Core 2 Duo based Macs and the Mac Pro.

A statement from Apple had previously blamed the charge on "generally accepted accounting principles", or GAAP. However, the Journal's interviewees do not agree.

"GAAP doesn't require you to charge squat," says Lynn Turner, managing director of research at Glass Lewis & Co. and a former chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission. "You charge whatever you want. GAAP doesn't even remotely address whether or not you charge for a significant functionality change. GAAP establishes what the proper accounting is, based on what you did or didn't charge for it."

[...]

Still, Apple's language surprised officials who oversee accounting rules. "Accounting doesn't require any charge for anything," says Edward Trott, a member of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which writes the accounting rules. "No, GAAP doesn't tell you to do anything. You need to work out your transaction with your customer, and GAAP will tell you how to reflect your transaction with that customer."


The reaction from the Mac community appears to be mixed since the formal announcement from Apple. While many were happy to see the final price drop more than half from its previously rumored $4.99 pricetag, many others were frustrated at having to pay anything for hardware capability already in their systems.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

66 months ago
$1.99. Who cares? If you think that is so expensive, live without "n". You'll be just fine.

--t
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago

$1.99. Who cares? If you think that is so expensive, live without "n". You'll be just fine.

Isn't it the case that until you get rid of all your b/g kit, you'll be "living without n" anyway?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
Note, its not the fact that Apple is charging that the accountants are blasting, but Apple's stated reasoning.

Us in the mac community seem to have two different beefs...

a) we don't like the fact that they are doing it at all
b) we don't like the reason they gave for it

(or none of the above)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
Seems there disagreement over whether apple need to do this, so Apple are playing safe and charging.

Of course, you would think the obvious solution would be for Apple to talk to the regulatory body and simply ask them.

If the defense lawyers are confused then so must be the prosecution council.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
I didn't read the detailed criticisms, just the clipped quotes. But these indicate Apple is being criticized for the wrong reasons. Apple didn't say "GAAP requires us to charge something." Apple said, in effect, "if we don't charge something, GAAP may require us to consider the original product to be a partial shipment, which may require us to restate earnings." Even if Apple is right (and it is certainly a matter of opinion if they are), there is no "requirement that they charge something." Apple in any case has the option to restate earnings.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
I really really really want some news agency to use the word dubious to describe Apple in this :p

It does sound strange. Why charge $1.99? Why charge at all? $1.99 is such a token amount...

That's like £1. I sneeze £1. And I'm a student!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
If I pau the $1.99 will depend on if I get the Airport, at which point 2 bucks is no big deal
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago

Of course, you would think the obvious solution would be for Apple to talk to the regulatory body and simply ask them.


Which regulatory body would that be? And what would they ask?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago
Oh, and one further point. This only affects people that bought the very very latest Mac's, and the latest Airport base station, right? I don't understand the big deal - because surely it only affects a handful of people.

That being said, it is a little... dubious...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
66 months ago

If I pau the $1.99 will depend on if I get the Airport, at which point 2 bucks is no big deal


If you get the new Airport base-station, you don't need to pay for the upgrade anyway because it's included in the box
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]