Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple and IBM's PowerPC Potential

eWeek is reporting that IBM denies that Apple's PowerPC power-consumption concerns were valid:

[IBM] could build PowerPC chips that satisfy the needs of the entire range of Apple's product lines, including portables such as the PowerBook, said Rod Adkins, vice president of development for IBM's Systems and Technology Group, which produces IBM's PowerPC chips.


Actual delivery/availability to Apple, however, may have been limited due to IBM and Apple's current relationship and manufacturing capability. There is also some speculation amongst analysts that perhaps Jobs was given non-public information about Intel's roadmap which may have swayed his decision. Such thoughts remain purely speculative, however.

IBM will be providing future PowerPCs for upcoming PowerMacs, however, as Jobs had indicated.

"We still have a number of products we're [IBM] doing with them [Apple]," Adkins, who declined to elaborate on the exact ones


The PowerPC 970MP has been widely discussed as a potential processor to be used in upcoming PowerMacs.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

86 months ago
If it's true, why the heck they didn't it??? It's impossible that Apple did not asked for this best processor, and they must be deaf, dumb and blind if they did not see it through out the mac world...

Ridiculous...

Fábio.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
It seems that IBM wants Apple back?

I don't know - I thought that they didn't have time for Apple and put all their efforts into gaming consoles.

I say that the 3ghz machine still isn't here. Let's see what Intel can do. Intel seems very very happy to be with Apple on this frontier.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
I hate IBM and I hate their idiotic PowerPC chips. Long live Intel!!!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
This sounds like a PR move from the company that basically just confessed that Apple's Intel switch had them completely blindsided. Like a little, "hey, we're still cool, we can still hang with the cool kids," for the rest of the world that's using IBM PPC chip variations in their stuff.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
Let me look on my 3.0 GHz G5 and check that out....
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
Prediction:

Fall Revision of Power Macs using the 970 MP.
About 10 months later at WWDC 2006, a small speed bump.
Another 10-12 months later, possibly at WWDC 2007, the first Intel based Power Macs.

Power Macs will be the last line to convert to Intel, maybe second only to the xServe.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
Well Intel musta showed Steve somethng that got him all hot and bothered to warrant a transition to a new cpu architecture. And if IBM is saying that they could deliver on what Jobs wanted then why didnt they? They screwed up and they knew it. They must be blind if they didn't see there was a problem. I'm sure Steve let them know plenty of times that he wasn't happy.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
IBM is still trying to win apple back, what losers
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago
I had a nightmare that Apple switched to intel a few nights ago. Then I woke up an thats when the real horror started, I realized its true.

IBM get off your buts and give us lower power G5 chips in dual core already. Apple please stop this intel nonsense.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
86 months ago

Let me look on my 3.0 GHz G5 and check that out....

+ dual core.

Then I upgrade my dual 2ghz G5.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]