Report: Apple to Announce More App Store Concessions for the EU

Apple is engaged in eleventh-hour negotiations with European Union regulators in an effort to delay or avoid a new wave of financial penalties stemming from noncompliance with the bloc's Digital Markets Act (DMA), the Financial Times reports.

App Store vs EU Feature 2
The company is under pressure to make significant changes to its App Store policies in the European Union after being fined €500 million earlier this year for preventing developers from directing users to alternative purchasing options outside of Apple's in-app payment system. That practice, referred to by regulators as "anti-steering," is explicitly prohibited under the DMA, which came into effect for designated gatekeepers, including Apple, in March 2024.

People involved in the discussions told the Financial Times that Apple is preparing to offer new concessions ahead of a Thursday, June 26 deadline, after which the European Commission is empowered to impose escalating daily fines of up to 5% of Apple's average global turnover. Based on Apple's 2023 revenue of $383 billion, such fines could amount to more than $50 million per day.

Apple's expected concessions will primarily relate to its steering rules, which have previously required developers to use Apple's payment infrastructure and prohibited them from linking users to external purchasing platforms. The upcoming proposals may ease those restrictions.

Apple introduced a new framework for alternative app marketplaces in the EU in iOS 17.4, which went into effect in March. The update allows developers to distribute apps through third-party app stores and to use alternative payment methods within their own apps.

However, some major developers and the European Commission itself argue that the changes do not go far enough to satisfy the requirements of the DMA. In particular, attention has focused on the Core Technology Fee (CTF), a charge of €0.50 per annual install on apps distributed outside the ‌App Store‌ after the first one million downloads. Sources cited by the Financial Times said the Core Technology Fee has also been part of the recent discussions between Apple and the European Commission.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro Dark Blue and Orange

iPhone 17 Release Date, Pre-Orders, and What to Expect

Thursday August 28, 2025 4:08 am PDT by
An iPhone 17 announcement is a dead cert for September 2025 – Apple has already sent out invites for an "Awe dropping" event on Tuesday, September 9 at the Apple Park campus in Cupertino, California. The timing follows Apple's trend of introducing new iPhone models annually in the fall. At the event, Apple is expected to unveil its new-generation iPhone 17, an all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17...
iPhone 17 Pro Iridescent Feature 2

iPhone 17 Pro Clear Case Leak Reveals Three Key Changes

Sunday August 31, 2025 1:26 pm PDT by
Apple is expected to unveil the iPhone 17 series on Tuesday, September 9, and last-minute rumors about the devices continue to surface. The latest info comes from a leaker known as Majin Bu, who has shared alleged images of Apple's Clear Case for the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max, or at least replicas. Image Credit: @MajinBuOfficial The images show three alleged changes compared to Apple's iP...
xiaomi apple ad india

Apple and Samsung Push Back Against Xiaomi's Bold India Ads

Friday August 29, 2025 4:54 am PDT by
Apple and Samsung have reportedly issued cease-and-desist notices to Xiaomi in India for an ad campaign that directly compares the rivals' devices to Xiaomi's products. The two companies have threatened the Chinese vendor with legal action, calling the ads "disparaging." Ads have appeared in local print media and on social media that take pot shots at the competitors' premium offerings. One...
iOS 18 on iPhone Arrow Down

Apple Preparing iOS 18.7 for iPhones as iOS 26 Release Date Nears

Sunday August 31, 2025 4:35 pm PDT by
Apple is preparing to release iOS 18.7 for compatible iPhone models, according to evidence of the update in the MacRumors visitor logs. We expect iOS 18.7 to be released in September, alongside iOS 26. The update will likely include fixes for security vulnerabilities, but little else. iOS 18.7 will be one of the final updates ever released for the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR,...
maxresdefault

The MacRumors Show: iPhone 17's 'Awe Dropping' Accessories

Friday August 29, 2025 8:12 am PDT by
Following the announcement of Apple's upcoming "Awe dropping" event, on this week's episode of The MacRumors Show we talk through all of the new accessories rumored to debut alongside the iPhone 17 lineup. Subscribe to The MacRumors Show YouTube channel for more videos We take a closer look at Apple's invite for "Awe dropping;" the design could hint at the iPhone 17's new thermal system with ...

Top Rated Comments

WarmWinterHat Avatar
10 weeks ago

I want the iPhone like the Mac, there I can choose Apple or an alternative. If Apple truly believed closed platforms were the way forward they would have sealed the Mac to the App Store years ago.
Agreed. I don't care about Andoid as I don't use it, but I do use MacOS, and would prefer iOS to be on the same level.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ctrlos Avatar
10 weeks ago
Regardless of the downsides the open web, the Mac and PC have all benefited from being open platforms more than they've lost out. The closed models of smartphones has created a generation of the IT-illiterate more reliant on corporate overlords than personal responsibility. There is something very wrong with that. Blah Blah viruses but we avoid those as a medical condition by properly educating people, not making them 100% reliable on big pharma.

Increased competition only improves things for customers in the end and opening up distribution leaves room for startup business models. If Apple are worried about developers leaving them behind they should improve their offering and make it more competitive.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ctrlos Avatar
10 weeks ago

right, apple just fell into a free money tap, and it is impossible for them to willingly turn it off, they need to be forced. whether legal or not would need to be decided by courts, but shareholders would sue in a heartbeat.
Shareholders are happy with the Mac as an open platform. This is Apple's classic double standards again, just like when they refused to put USB-C on the iPhone despite selling a TV remote that included it. Making the iPhone open doesn't remove the App Store distribution model. Plenty of devs use the Mac App Store after all. But as a customer you can also choose the open web, old repositories, Steam, Epic, GOG and a lot of other storefronts. Nothing wrong with some good old fashioned choice.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Sophisticatednut Avatar
10 weeks ago

Yes Apple will have to. Apple should absolutely follow the laws in the jurisdictions it operates in.

Doesn't mean it's a good law, morally right, won't make products worse, or completely explain why the EU is a wasteland when it comes to innovation.
You’re mistaking the lack of consumer-facing mega companies like Apple or Google for a lack of innovation. But that’s a category error. The EU doesn’t churn out viral apps or clone startups to chase VC hype it builds the infrastructure that U.S. companies depend on to even function.

Why? Because Europe funded long-term R&D, integrated cross-border innovation, and regulated for competition, not for quarterly profits or market consolidation or to maximize shallow investor returns.

While the U.S. was busy offshoring and consolidating, Europe was making bets on deep tech that actually paid off. What America calls “innovation” often amounts to scaling UX polish and acquisitions not real technological breakthroughs.

Here’s what actual innovation looks like:



* ASML (NL): The only company in the world that makes EUV lithography machines. No ASML, no cutting-edge chips. Apple, Nvidia, AMD, TSMC, Intel all rely on it. The U.S. government literally tried to protect its domestic lithography industry (GCA, SVG, etc.). ASML still crushed them. Not because the U.S. dropped the ball because Europe out-innovated and never stopped investing.
* Infineon (DE): Core supplier of EV chips, power semiconductors, and industrial controls. Tesla’s supply chain runs through them.
* Ericsson (SE) & Nokia (FI): Building over 50% of global 5G RAN infrastructure including the U.S. market. AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile all depend on them. Huawei? Banned. Cisco? Out of the game.
* Adyen (NL) & Stripe (IE): The back-end of global digital payments. Uber, Amazon, Netflix, Meta? They’re all running their payments through EU infrastructure.
* SAP (DE): The world’s biggest ERP provider. No U.S. equivalent exists at this scale. Runs 87% of global commerce through its ERP systems. Name a Fortune 500 it’s running SAP
* Siemens (DE): Builds smart factories, mobility systems, power grids, and medical tech. Quietly powers the industrial world
* BioNTech (DE): Delivered the first approved mRNA vaccine in the West. Moderna wasn’t first. Pfizer licensed from BioNTech.
* ARM (UK): The CPU architecture for every smartphone on Earth. Apple’s M-series is just a high-end implementation.
* Airbus (FR/DE): The only serious rival to Boeing and unlike them, Airbus actually makes planes that fly without falling apart mid-air. It leads on fuel efficiency, safety, and next-gen aviation R&D. And while Boeing’s still in Senate hearings, Airbus is busy delivering jets on time.
* Philips (NL): No longer just light bulbs now a leader in medical imaging, diagnostics, and hospital technology.
* KONE (FI): Global leader in elevators, escalators, and urban vertical mobility. Probably built the one you took this morning.
* Celonis (DE): Invented and leads the “process mining” category Fortune 500 firms use it to analyze and optimize business systems.
* SWIFT (BE): Runs the backbone of global bank-to-bank payments. Still dominant despite U.S. attempts to build alternatives.

You don’t see this on iPhone commercials because it’s not consumer-facing. It’s foundational. Europe builds what America runs on.

[HEADING=1]TL;DR:[/HEADING]

America builds empires. Europe builds the infrastructure they run on.

No EU? Then your iPhone doesn’t boot, your chips don’t print, your vaccines don’t exist, and your networks don’t connect. Europe doesn’t “move fast and break things.” We build slow, own the critical layers, and let the U.S. sell it back with shiny packaging.

That’s why we regulate gatekeepers not because we hate tech, but because we know scale without checks kills real innovation. You don’t get another ASML or ARM by letting companies hoard control.

Call it boring or invisible but every time you unlock your phone, pay online, stream Netflix, or use your headphones, you’re relying on European tech. The EU isn’t a tech wasteland. It’s the foundation. You’re just too distracted by the screen on top and arrogant to notice it.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DelayedGratificationGene Avatar
10 weeks ago
Whatever. This news story is very played already. IMO minuscule amount of App Store users will veer off. Who wants more users and passwords, new subscriptions everywhere(to forget about cancelling), security and privacy concerns(with your financials no less). I mean the reasons for not leaving go on and on.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
melchior Avatar
10 weeks ago

Regardless of the downsides the open web, the Mac and PC have all benefited from being open platforms more than they've lost out. The closed models of smartphones has created a generation of the IT-illiterate more reliant on corporate overlords than personal responsibility. There is something very wrong with that. Blah Blah viruses but we avoid those as a medical condition by properly educating people, not making them 100% reliable on big pharma.

Increased competition only improves things for customers in the end and opening up distribution leaves room for startup business models. If Apple are worried about developers leaving them behind they should improve their offering and make it more competitive.
right, apple just fell into a free money tap, and it is impossible for them to willingly turn it off, they need to be forced. whether legal or not would need to be decided by courts, but shareholders would sue in a heartbeat.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)