Skip to Content

Apple Appeals EU Digital Markets Act Interoperability Rules

Apple has filed an appeal against the European Union's Digital Markets Act interoperability requirements, calling the rules "deeply flawed" and a threat to user security (via The Wall Street Journal).

european commission
Apple submitted its challenge to the EU's General Court in Luxembourg on May 30, targeting the Commission's March decision that requires Apple to make iOS more compatible with rival products including smartwatches, headphones, and VR headsets.

Under the DMA, Apple must grant third-party developers access to iOS features typically reserved for its own products, such as allowing notifications to appear on competing wearable devices. The rules also mandate faster data transfers and easier device pairing for non-Apple hardware.

Apple argues the requirements force it to share sensitive user data with competitors, creating security risks. The company specifically highlighted requests from rivals seeking access to notification content and complete WiFi network histories – data that "even Apple doesn't see."

"At Apple, we design our technology to work seamlessly together," a company spokesperson said. "The EU's interoperability requirements threaten that foundation, while creating a process that is unreasonable, costly, and stifles innovation."

The tech giant claims some companies are exploiting the DMA to bypass EU data protection standards. Apple has dedicated 500 engineers to DMA compliance efforts and launched a developer portal for interoperability requests.

Companies violating DMA rules face fines up to 10% of worldwide annual revenue. The Commission can also order business breakups in extreme cases.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Seven New Products

Friday March 6, 2026 11:48 am PST by
Apple this week unveiled seven products, including an iPhone 17e, an iPad Air with the M4 chip, updated MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models, a new Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and an all-new MacBook Neo that starts at just $599. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic...
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

Apple Planning 'MacBook Ultra' With Touchscreen and Higher Price

Sunday March 8, 2026 8:05 am PDT by
Apple is planning to launch an all-new "MacBook Ultra" model this year, featuring an OLED display, touchscreen, and a higher price point, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Gurman revealed the information in his latest "Power On" newsletter. While Apple has been widely expected to launch new M6-series MacBook Pro models with OLED displays, touchscreen functionality, and a new, thinner design...

Top Rated Comments

WarmWinterHat Avatar
10 months ago

Imagine advocating for apps being able to store your credit card numbers in a plaintext SQL database for digital goods. Idiots.

"We want a choice!". You already do. Android. Not hard to understand. You're essentially reducing choice by making iOS like Android. 🤦‍♂️
I really, really, don't like that comparison. It's not making iPhone like Android, it's making Apple better. The fact that Android already did just means Google is ahead. I don't like ecosystems, at all, and want to be able to mix-and-match as I see fit.

Some of these, I agree, are going to far, but I think there should be a lot more interoperability. I live in a mixed iPhone/Android household (myself on iPhone, and wife on a Pixel).
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
10 months ago

DMA is not a policy to support Users. There is no U of user or C of consumer ANYWHERE in that law. Only the M for market. Which means this is pure protectionism of European companies that can't compete with American companies. Again NO EU company is a "gatekeeper" according to the EU, even though some should absolutely be one.
Bytedance is a gatekeeper and it's Chinese. They aren't all American.

Either way, I don't care where they are from. If American companies want to operate in the EU, they do so under EU rules. American doesn't get to export laws and business practices.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
My biggest worry right now is what America is planning on forcing Apple to do in the near future. While European Union I trust way more with their policies support for Users.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
Thank goodness I don't live in an EU country.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ItsASpider Avatar
10 months ago

Imagine advocating for apps being able to store your credit card numbers in a plaintext SQL database for digital goods. Idiots.
Imagine thinking that that's how any of this works...

If Apple's software is that fragile and insecure, maybe it just shouldn't exist in the first place.


Please let Apple release iPhone mirroring on macOS just like it was intended. Apple’s secret sauce is their tight integration, the ecosystem.


While EU costumers are happy to now be able to use a standard charging port such as USB-C, thanks to the push of EU, sometimes I think they’re going too far. And iPhone screen mirroring is fundamentally a continuity/handoff feature (never knew the difference between them).
It's worth noting that there is absolutely nothing in EU law that blocks Apple from making screen mirroring available in the EU. Just like there was absolutely nothing that blocked them from allowing PWAs, which they were also called out for by the EU itself. It's why its competitors - despite having to adhere to the same rules - do have these features.


DMA is not a policy to support Users. There is no U of user or C of consumer ANYWHERE in that law. Only the M for market. Which means this is pure protectionism of European companies that can't compete with American companies. Again NO EU company is a "gatekeeper" according to the EU, even though some should absolutely be one.

And if you think "protecionism" isn't bad. It's actually illegal under EU law, a country isn't allowed to give market protection to a company. This would end in large fines from the EC (European Comission). But using this legislation they have reworked this "protection" into a new law.
Just like GDPR doesn't protect citizens privacy, because other legislation easily tramples it.
See, that's the difference between the EU and the US. "Market" is not just "corporate intrests". "Market" in the DMA does mean consumers. But you knew that already. Just as you know that this "protectionism" rant is also bs. The DMA is, just like every other country has, just another anti-trust law. By your warped definition of what "protectionism" is, the EU wouldn't be allowed to have any anti-trust rules, and again, you know that that's just bs.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago

I'm with Apple on this one. Apple has always been about integrating hardware and software to create a cohesive environment, The Walled Garden. There's a reason this appeal to millions of users.

It's kind of like telling Chevy their engines have to work in their competitor's vehicles.
Terrible analogy. No one is telling Apple their parts need to work in other companies products. Exactly the opposite, which is why you have the freedom to buy non-Chevy tires for your Chevy. Or windshield wipers. Walk into any auto parts store for an example of how many 3rd party parts integrate with a Chevy car perfectly.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)