Apple's plans to allow developers to use third-party alternative payments methods within their apps in South Korea "lacks concrete detail," according to South Korea's Communications Commission (KCC).
In August, South Korea passed a law that bans app store operators from requiring developers to use their in-app purchase systems. Last month, Apple submitted its compliance plans to the KCC that would allow apps in Apple's South Korean App Store to use third-party payment methods within their apps. Apple's plans include that the company will still take a commission for all purchases made, even those made with third-party alternative payment methods, but specific details were not shared.
Now, ahead of the law being finalized and enacted, South Korea's KCC says Apple's submitted plan "lacks concrete detail," reports Reuters. KCC is unhappy that both Apple and Google still plan to charge a commission on purchases made with third-party payment methods, arguing that such a commission will entice developers to stay with the app stores' respective, default payment process.
"As a result of any policy, if app developers find it realistically difficult to use an alternative payment system and resort to using the dominant app store operator's payment system, it would not fit the law's purpose," the official said, adding that this stance would likely be reflected in the final ordinance."
A similar series of events have taken place in The Netherlands, one of several countries looking into Apple's App Store. Dating apps in The Netherlands will soon be allowed to use third-party alternative payment methods. Apple's plans to comply with the law in The Netherlands have been criticized for being inadequate in addressing concerns, leading to a fine of 5 million euros per week up to a maximum of 50 million euros until Apple complies.
"We look forward to working with the KCC and our developer community on a solution that benefits our Korean users," Apple had previously said in a statement about the law in South Korea. "Our work will always be guided by keeping the App Store a safe and trusted place for our users to download the apps they love," the company added.
Apple is not expected to release a standard iPhone 18 model this year, according to a growing number of reports that suggest the company is planning a significant change to its long-standing annual iPhone launch cycle.
Despite the immense success of the iPhone 17 in 2025, the iPhone 18 is not expected to arrive until the spring of 2027, leaving the iPhone 17 in the lineup as the latest...
Language learning app Duolingo has apparently been using the iPhone's Live Activity feature to display ads on the Lock Screen and the Dynamic Island, which violates Apple's design guidelines.
According to multiple reports on Reddit, the Duolingo app has been displaying an ad for a "Super offer," which is Duolingo's paid subscription option.
Apple's guidelines for Live Activity state that...
The company behind the BlackBerry-like Clicks Keyboard accessory for the iPhone today unveiled a new Android 16 smartphone called the Clicks Communicator.
The purpose-built device is designed to be used as a second phone alongside your iPhone, with the intended focus being communication over content consumption. It runs a custom Android launcher that offers a curated selection of messaging...
Apple's restrained artificial intelligence strategy may pay off in 2026 amid the arrival of a revamped Siri and concerns around the AI market "bubble" bursting, The Information argues.
The speculative report notes that Apple has taken a restrained approach with AI innovations compared with peers such as OpenAI, Google, and Meta, which are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in data...
Apple plans to introduce a 12.9-inch MacBook in spring 2026, according to TrendForce.
In a press release this week, the Taiwanese research firm said this MacBook will be aimed at the entry-level to mid-range market, with "competitive pricing."
TrendForce did not share any further details about this MacBook, but the information that it shared lines up with several rumors about a more...
Tuesday December 30, 2025 2:11 pm PST by Juli Clover
The Apple Fitness+ Instagram account today teased that the service has "big plans" for 2026. In a video, several Apple Fitness+ trainers are shown holding up newspapers with headlines related to Apple Fitness+.
What's Apple Fitness+ Planning for the New Year?
Something Big is Coming to Apple Fitness+
The Countdown Begins. Apple Fitness+ 2026 is Almost Here
2026 Plans Still Under ...
Apple today announced a number of updates to Apple Fitness+ and activity with the Apple Watch.
The key announcements include:
New Year limited-edition award: Users can win the award by closing all three Activity Rings for seven days in a row in January.
"Quit Quitting" Strava challenge: Available in Strava throughout January, users who log 12 workouts anytime in the month will win an ...
Wednesday December 31, 2025 9:59 am PST by Juli Clover
Apple hasn't updated the Mac Pro since 2023, and according to recent rumors, there's no update coming in the near future. In fact, Apple might be finished with the Mac Pro.
Bloomberg recently said that the Mac Pro is "on the back burner" and has been "largely written off" by Apple. Apple apparently views the more compact Mac Studio as the ideal high-end pro-level desktop, and it has almost...
Google has already stated how they will handle commissions in South Korea:
15% if you use the Google Play Store payment system 11% if you use another payment system
I'm guessing Apple will do something similar.
But you may be saying "that's only 4% less... once the developer pays for outside payment processing... it'll be roughly the same as if Google handled it all!"
That's true! So maybe instead of arguing about
"alternative payment systems"
developers should have been begging for
"lower commission fees"
Because guess what... payment fees are pretty standard nowadays. 3% to 4%
But it's the platform commission fees were always the bulk of what developers paid.
No one ever talked about it because it was all rolled into one flat fee.
But now that we can separate platform fees and payment fees... I guess people will start arguing about commission fees next!
It’s absurd to think Apple will never be allowed to charge a commission with or without payment options. If that happened then every platform from Walmart to PlayStation would never make money and be forced out of business. Stop even questioning the commission aspect because it’s NOT going away.
Google has already stated how they will handle commissions in South Korea:
15% if you use the Google Play Store payment system 11% if you use another payment system
I'm guessing Apple will do something similar.
But you may be saying "that's only 4% less... once the developer pays for outside payment processing... it'll be roughly the same as if Google handled it all!"
That's true! So maybe instead of arguing about
"alternative payment systems"
developers should have been begging for
"lower commission fees"
Because guess what... payment fees are pretty standard nowadays. 3% to 4%
But it's the platform commission fees were always the bulk of what developers paid.
No one ever talked about it because it was all rolled into one flat fee.
But now that we can separate platform fees and payment fees... I guess people will start arguing about commission fees next!
:p
Guess that is the point. Apple has never declared how it is going to control bank transfers and collect fees. What is the difference between using a locally implemented in app payment and a payment on a website? What if the app invokes a website for payment? What if the app displays the website in an integrated browser within the app?
Guess Apple is simply not allowed to control transfers of money? Why doesn't Microsoft charge me, when I use internet banking using Microsofts edge browser on Windows?
Apples proposal is simply rediculous. Will Apple charge me for any bank transfer that is done using macOS? What if I buy a movie on AmazonPrime using macOS? What if I use iPadOS? Does it make a difference if I use an App or the browser?
“Ok Epic here is your commission invoice for your 3rd party payment transactions”….”what?”…”wait!”…”so now it’s costing me to have a 3rd party payment system PLUS I still have to pay you guys commission for your awesome platform?!”…”man this is going all the wrong way!”……hmmm I should have thought this out better
If they're going to act like this, then they should have the iPhone and its app store taken away. Imagine telling a physical store that you want to put your products on its shelves for free, want your own payment method added to their checkout for free, and dictate the exact terms of how they are sold. South Korean lawmakers are completely out of touch, and would be straightened out by their citizens in about ten minutes if Apple threatened to pull out of the country.
