Rdio is planning to launch a new streaming tier for $3.99 a month with specific limitations this Thursday, according to BuzzFeed. The news comes as Apple's new streaming service, a rebranded version of Beats Music that may be called Apple Music, gears up to launch next month.

rdio

Rdio says the service, called Rdio Select, will include two components: 1) Pandora-like streaming radio stations, without ads, and with the ability to skip ahead as often as you want, and 2) daily access to 25 songs of your choosing. Subscribers will be able to download the 25 songs and replace some or all (or none) of them each day, so long as the number doesn’t exceed 25.

Anthony Bay, Rdio's CEO, tells BuzzFeed that they chose 25 songs because it's "more than most users download in a day". He goes on to note that it also allows the company to not lose money at the price of $4 a month, saying that the company agrees with artist Taylor Swift that on-demand playback of music should not be free.

The move, according to Rdio, is an attempt to tap into a market that doesn't feel ready to pay $9.99 a month for streaming music. Similar to Rdio, Apple's new music streaming service will not offer a free tier. Apple plans on charging $9.99 a month for the service, which will have a focus on curated content. Apple's original plans for its new streaming service planned on, like Rdio, undercutting $9.99-a-month streaming services. Apple had reportedly wanted to offer its service for $5 a month and then $7.99 a month before backing down after resistance from record labels.

Earlier today, it was reported that it would incorporate social media tools for artists to share content with fans. The Cupertino company is also planning to offer a range of exclusive content from artists, which could use the new social media tools to do so. While Apple is still working on completing deals ahead of launch, it's still expected to debut at the Worldwide Developers Conference in June.

Top Rated Comments

69Mustang Avatar
140 months ago
"The move, according to Rdio, is an attempt to tap into a market that doesn't feel ready to pay $9.99 a month for streaming music."

Have to laugh at our American cousins. That price is just a tad more than the cost of a Burger King meal over here. You wouldn't even notice that amount coming out of your bank each month lol.

This is more about value than price. Just because something is affordable doesn't mean someone finds value in it. Take a streaming service, pack of cigarettes, and a movie ticket. In Chicago (just an example), all of these things are approximately the same price. All are elective choices and all have value to someone. One might find value in streaming service, but not cigarettes, or value in a movie ticket but not streaming.

Rdio's $4 service is for those who don't find value at $10 but can see the value at a lower cost. It's not about what's coming out of your bank account. It's about what you find valuable personally. Just like someone might find Burger King has more value (*throws up in mouth*).
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MacrumoursUser Avatar
140 months ago
Spotify costs $9.99 a month... but so far they've only convinced 15 million people to pay for it.

Maybe $10 a month is too high.

Or maybe there are simply not many people who are willing to pay for music streaming.

Which is weird because I keep hearing that steaming is the future.

Streaming might have 1 000 000 000 songs to offer, but if it's 99.99999999% junk to my taste paying every month doesn't make sense to me if I spend same or less per year to download music.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ballis Avatar
140 months ago
The price is obviously to high if those are the numbers.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Bot4Hire Avatar
140 months ago
The only thing I like about this service is the fact that there are no limits on skips. But other than that, it sounds lame. Not getting it.
As lame as Ping 2.0 courtesy of beats?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Michael Scrip Avatar
140 months ago


"The move, according to Rdio, is an attempt to tap into a market that doesn't feel ready to pay $9.99 a month for streaming music."

Have to laugh at our American cousins. That price is just a tad more than the cost of a Burger King meal over here. You wouldn't even notice that amount coming out of your bank each month lol.
Spotify costs $9.99 a month... but so far they've only convinced 15 million people to pay for it.

Maybe $10 a month is too high.

Or maybe there are simply not many people who are willing to pay for music streaming.

Which is weird because I keep hearing that steaming is the future.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
2457282 Avatar
140 months ago
Top 50 these days is not what I would call music.

I usually listen to the Jazz, Alternative and Latin Top 50. Rarely listen to the Pop, Country, Rock, etc. lists. My days of bubble gum pop hits are way past me.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

maxresdefault

Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17

Saturday February 7, 2026 9:26 am PST by
Apple today shared an ad that shows how the upgraded Center Stage front camera on the latest iPhones improves the process of taking a group selfie. "Watch how the new front facing camera on iPhone 17 Pro takes group selfies that automatically expand and rotate as more people come into frame," says Apple. While the ad is focused on the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the regular iPhone...
apple wallet drivers license feature iPhone 15 pro

Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses

Monday February 9, 2026 6:24 am PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
m5 macbook pro deal

Why You Shouldn't Buy the Next MacBook Pro

Tuesday February 10, 2026 4:27 pm PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models as soon as early March, but if you can, this is one generation you should skip because there's something much better in the works. We're waiting on 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, with few changes other than the processor upgrade. There won't be any tweaks to the design or the display, but later this...
Apple Logo Zoomed

Apple Expected to Launch These 10+ Products Over the Coming Months

Tuesday February 10, 2026 6:33 am PST by
It has been a slow start to 2026 for Apple product launches, with only a new AirTag and a special Apple Watch band released so far. We are still waiting for MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the iPhone 17e, a lower-cost MacBook with an iPhone chip, long-rumored updates to the Apple TV and HomePod mini, and much more. Apple is expected to release/update the following products...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March

Sunday February 8, 2026 6:02 am PST by
New MacBook Pro models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips could arrive as soon as Monday, March 2, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the release of new MacBook Pro models is tied to the release of macOS Tahoe 26.3. The launch is said to be slated for as early as the week of March 2. He added that the M4 Pro and M4 Max models on sale today...