Skip to Content

Review: A Week With iPhone 16e

It's been a week since Apple released the iPhone 16e, its new low-cost (but not as low-cost as before) smartphone. The ‌iPhone‌ 16e has many of the same capabilities as Apple's flagship iPhones, but it is lacking in some key areas to save money. So, is it worth the savings? MacRumors videographer Dan Barbera spent a week with the ‌iPhone‌ 16e as his main ‌iPhone‌ to see what he could live without.


At $599, the ‌iPhone‌ 16e is quite a bit more expensive than the ‌iPhone‌ SE 3 that it replaces, but it offers a current-generation A18 chip, an all-display design with Face ID instead of Touch ID and OLED technology, a 48-megapixel single-lens rear camera, long battery life, USB-C, and safety features like Emergency SOS via Satellite and Crash Detection, all of which were not in the ‌iPhone‌ SE.

Most iPhones have had two or more cameras for several years now, so the single-lens camera on the ‌iPhone‌ 16e is surprisingly subtle and makes for a clean, minimal design where the camera isn't the dominant feature drawing the eye. There's also less weight with the slimmed down camera setup, so it doesn't feel heavy in the hand. You can only get the ‌iPhone‌ 16e in black or white, but they're classic colors.

Since Apple slimmed down the bezels with the flagship iPhone 16 lineup, the bezels on the ‌iPhone‌ 16e are more noticeable, but that's something that will mostly only come up when it's right next to an ‌iPhone 16‌. Apple modeled the ‌iPhone‌ 16e after the ‌iPhone‌ 14, so it's also got a notch instead of a Dynamic Island. The OLED display doesn't support 120Hz, and it's not quite as bright as what you get with the ‌iPhone 16‌. You're also not going to get the always-on display, and if that's something you're used to, you might miss it. But if you've never had that functionality, you won't know the difference.

There's no Camera Control button, but you do get an Action Button and support for all of the Apple Intelligence features, including Visual Intelligence. It's just activated from the Control Center or Action Button instead of Camera Control. The Camera Control button isn't something most people will likely care about. The A18 chip is basically the same chip you get in the ‌iPhone 16‌, but with one less GPU core, a change that's not super noticeable.

Apple added a USB-C port for charging, but one major absence is support for MagSafe and Qi2. There is no magnetic ring in the ‌iPhone‌ 16e, so it does not work with all of the magnetic accessories that have come out for iPhones over the last several years. It's also limited to 7.5W charging speeds instead of the 15W you can get with ‌MagSafe‌ or Qi2, and that's a big downside.

If you've never had ‌MagSafe‌, you won't mind charging primarily with a cable, but if you have ‌MagSafe‌ accessories already, it's going to be a downgrade.

The 48-megapixel camera is about the same as the camera in the ‌iPhone 16‌, and it can take 1x and 2x photos. You don't get a Telephoto lens with 5x zoom or an Ultra Wide lens with 0.5x zoom and macro photo capabilities, but those are more niche camera features that are more nice to have than essential.

The ‌iPhone‌ 16e has one unique component, and that's Apple's C1 modem. So far, it seems to be performing about the same as Qualcomm's modem chip, though there is no support for the faster mmWave 5G networks. We didn't see any notable speed difference between the ‌iPhone 16‌ and ‌iPhone‌ 16e when testing the devices on Verizon's network, but the C1 modem actually seemed to be more reliable in some instances where signal was low.

Did you get an ‌iPhone‌ 16e? Let us know what you think of it in the comments.

Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Two New Products

Monday March 2, 2026 7:49 am PST by
Apple today introduced two new devices, including the iPhone 17e and an updated iPad Air. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic accessories, Apple's second-generation C1X modem for faster 5G, and a doubled 256GB of base storage. In the U.S., the iPhone 17e starts at $599, just like the ...

Top Rated Comments

13 months ago
I still think it’s $100 too expensive but apart from that it looks ok as an entry level iPhone.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
13 months ago

If this had MagSafe and Qi2 it would be an instant buy for my mom and dad. They don’t need the frills, but they will miss the MagSafe. I guess they are getting the 16.
Just as Tim Cook planned.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
13 months ago
Looks like a nice phone at a nice price.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
McWetty Avatar
13 months ago
If this had MagSafe and Qi2 it would be an instant buy for my mom and dad. They don’t need the frills, but they will miss the MagSafe. I guess they are getting the 16.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
13 months ago
Seriously not bothered about the lack of MagSafe - I mean MagSafe for the iPhone is almost the definition of a first world problem. Whereas MagSafe for the Mac is literally a Macsaver.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
FSMBP Avatar
13 months ago

Personally, I’d have added MagSafe and kept the same price OR no MagSafe but price it at $549 or $579.
Yes - it makes no reasonable sense not to have Magsafe.

Apple's excuse was Magsafe is "most people in the iPhone 16e's target audience exclusively charge their phones by plugging them into a charging cable"...Well no crap, if don't you offer them Magsafe charging, they can't use it. I know Magsafe isn't the only way to charge wirelessly, but honestly it should be.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)