Apple Announces $500B US Investment Plan, Adding 20K Jobs

Apple has announced plans to invest $500 billion in the United States over the next four years, including a significant expansion of its domestic manufacturing and research capabilities, according to Bloomberg. The commitment comes following a recent meeting between CEO Tim Cook and President Donald Trump.

Apple Logo Cash Feature Yellow
The tech giant's plans include the construction of a new server manufacturing facility in Houston, where Apple and Foxconn will produce servers for Apple's Private Cloud Compute system. The 250,000-square-foot facility is scheduled to open next year.

Apple will also establish a supplier academy in Michigan, "to train the next generation of US manufacturers," and will expand its data center presence across multiple states, including Arizona, Oregon, Iowa, Nevada, and North Carolina. The company confirmed that chip production has already begun at TSMC's Arizona facility, which is currently manufacturing components for some Apple Watch and iPad models.

The 20,000 new jobs Apple plans to create will focus primarily on research and development, silicon engineering, and artificial intelligence. This matches the company's previous hiring wave, which added 20,000 R&D positions over the last five years.

In Detroit, Apple plans to double down on manufacturing education by opening a dedicated academy to support smaller companies. The tech giant is also doubling its US manufacturing fund to $10 billion.

"We are bullish on the future of American innovation, and we're proud to build on our long-standing US investments with this $500 billion commitment to our country’s future," Cook said in a statement. "We'll keep working with people and companies across this country to help write an extraordinary new chapter in the history of American innovation."

The announcement is likely to have been strategically timed, given that Trump has threatened to impose an additional 10% tax on Chinese imports. Cook previously succeeded in protecting the iPhone from tariffs during Trump's first term by arguing that such measures would end up benefiting competitors like Samsung.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

apple watch ultra yellow

What's Next for the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and Apple Watch SE 3

Friday April 25, 2025 2:44 pm PDT by
This week marks the 10th anniversary of the Apple Watch, which launched on April 24, 2015. Yesterday, we recapped features rumored for the Apple Watch Series 11, but since 2015, the Apple Watch has also branched out into the Apple Watch Ultra and the Apple Watch SE, so we thought we'd take a look at what's next for those product lines, too. 2025 Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple didn't update the...
iphone 16 display

iPhone 17's Scratch Resistant Anti-Reflective Display Coating Canceled

Monday April 28, 2025 12:48 pm PDT by
Apple may have canceled the super scratch resistant anti-reflective display coating that it planned to use for the iPhone 17 Pro models, according to a source with reliable information that spoke to MacRumors. Last spring, Weibo leaker Instant Digital suggested Apple was working on a new anti-reflective display layer that was more scratch resistant than the Ceramic Shield. We haven't heard...
iPhone 17 Air Pastel Feature

iPhone 17 Reaches Key Milestone Ahead of Mass Production

Monday April 28, 2025 8:44 am PDT by
Apple has completed Engineering Validation Testing (EVT) for at least one iPhone 17 model, according to a paywalled preview of an upcoming DigiTimes report. iPhone 17 Air mockup based on rumored design The EVT stage involves Apple testing iPhone 17 prototypes to ensure the hardware works as expected. There are still DVT (Design Validation Test) and PVT (Production Validation Test) stages to...
Beyond iPhone 13 Better Blue

20th Anniversary iPhone Likely to Be Made in China Due to 'Extraordinarily Complex' Design

Monday April 28, 2025 4:29 am PDT by
Apple will likely manufacture its 20th anniversary iPhone models in China, despite broader efforts to shift production to India, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In 2027, Apple is planning a "major shake-up" for the iPhone lineup to mark two decades since the original model launched. Gurman's previous reporting indicates the company will introduce a foldable iPhone alongside a "bold"...
iPhone 17 Air Pastel Feature

iPhone 17 Air Launching Later This Year With These 16 New Features

Thursday April 24, 2025 8:24 am PDT by
While the so-called "iPhone 17 Air" is not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the ultra-thin device. Overall, the iPhone 17 Air sounds like a mixed bag. While the device is expected to have an impressively thin and light design, rumors indicate it will have some compromises compared to iPhone 17 Pro models, including only a single rear camera, a...
iPhone 17 Pro Blue Feature Tighter Crop

iPhone 17 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 13 New Features

Wednesday April 23, 2025 8:31 am PDT by
While the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are not expected to launch until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models as of April 2025: Aluminum frame: iPhone 17 Pro models are rumored to have an aluminum frame, whereas the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro models have a titanium frame, and the iPhone ...

Top Rated Comments

grantishere Avatar
9 weeks ago
Made in America ??
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)
katewes Avatar
9 weeks ago
Tim Cook acts like a politician. For example, whenever Cook was asked why he didn't let Apple do more manufacturing in the U.S. rather than in China, he gave this excuse that manufacturing in China wasn't just for lower costs, but because of China's greater manufacturing infrastructure and expertise. But no one challenged Cook to explain WHY China has better manufacturing infrastructure and expertise. It's because decades ago, money-hungry companies like Apple shifted their manufacturing to China, thus creating the environment for China to grow that beneficial environment and workforce. In an alternate reality, if companies like Apple had kept their manufacturing in the U.S., then that same awesome manufacturing infrastructure and expertise would have been in the U.S. today, not in China. I hate it when people in the Media, who interview Tim Cook, never press him on that point.
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DrJR Avatar
9 weeks ago
YES! Bring it all home! ♥️??
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rgwebb Avatar
9 weeks ago

Tim Cook acts like a politician. For example, whenever Cook was asked why he didn't let Apple do more manufacturing in the U.S. rather than in China, he gave this excuse that manufacturing in China wasn't just for lower costs, but because of China's greater manufacturing infrastructure and expertise. But no one challenged Cook to explain WHY China has better manufacturing infrastructure and expertise. It's because decades ago, money-hungry companies like Apple shifted their manufacturing to China, thus creating the environment for China to grow that beneficial environment and workforce. In an alternate reality, if companies like Apple had kept their manufacturing in the U.S., then that same awesome manufacturing infrastructure and expertise would have been in the U.S. today, not in China. I hate it when people in the Media, who interview Tim Cook, never press him on that point.
I don’t think that is the whole truth. China put a huge state investment into becoming an electronics manufacturing leader in the 90s and 00s.

The United States problem is we think private corporations will just do whatever is good for the United States instead of their shareholders. US corporations outsourced because it increased shareholder value. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. established shareholder supremacy as US legal precedent in the 1920s. If the US wants companies to make decisions other than increase shareholder value, they can either tariff the businesses into reconsidering their import decisions or become a majority shareholder in strategically important businesses. I think the latter is not considered enough in this country but it is possibly the future of Intel if they want a US owned and operated full stack semiconductor designer and manufacturer.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Admiral Avatar
9 weeks ago
Doesn't $500 billion investment creating 20,000 jobs work out to an investment of $25 million per job? Am I doing the math wrong? A billion is a thousand millions.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Johnny London Avatar
9 weeks ago
Why not? Is this decision influenced by the Trump administration’s efforts to make the US more attractive for businesses overall? I assume it is. Non-US citizen here
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)