Apple Blocked Facebook Update Highlighting Apple's In-App Purchase Fees

Apple blocked Facebook's attempt to tell users about the 30% fee that Apple would take of all in-app purchases made through a new online events feature, Facebook has told Reuters. Apple reportedly told Facebook the update violated an App Store rule that prevents developers from showing "irrelevant" information to users.

paid online events facebook preview
Facebook planned to launch a new tool in its app that lets online influencers and other businesses host paid online events as a way to recoup revenue lost during the global health crisis. The feature lets Facebook users buy tickets for the events directly through the app.

Apple's long-standing ‌App Store‌ rules say the iPhone maker takes a 30% cut of all in-app purchases. When Facebook asked Apple to waive the fee so it could pass on all events revenue to business owners, Apple reportedly declined.

The feature is now available in the Facebook app, just without the message notifying users about Apple's 30% fee. The image above was released by Facebook earlier this month to show what the message would have looked like.

Facebook reportedly intended to show a message on Android that read "Facebook doesn't take a fee from this purchase," but Reuters said the message doesn't appear in the version of Facebook currently available on the Google Play Store.

"Now more than ever, we should have the option to help people understand where money they intend for small businesses actually goes. Unfortunately Apple rejected our transparency notice around their 30% tax but we are still working to make that information available inside the app experience," Facebook said in a statement.

Apple did not respond to a request for comment.

Nothing about Apple's actions is new here – the company has been consistent in preventing other apps like Netflix and Spotify from discussing ‌App Store‌ policies, such as explaining that users could pay for their services via the web without Apple taking a cut.

What's different in this case is that by previewing the message ahead of submitting it to Apple's ‌App Store‌ review process, Facebook is clearly looking to fuel debate about the way Apple polices apps on its iOS platform, at a time when Apple is already facing antitrust lawsuits and government probes over alleged anticompetitive actions.

One particularly vocal critic has been Fortnite creator Epic Games, which has repeatedly referred to the ‌App Store‌ as a monopoly. Earlier this month, Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store after ‌Epic Games‌ introduced a direct payment option in the app for its in-game currency, violating ‌App Store‌ rules. In an apparently orchestrated move, ‌Epic Games‌ promptly filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior.

Spotify and Microsoft have since sided with Epic over the issue, and Facebook's latest action suggests they have picked up another ally in the increasing controversy over Apple's ‌App Store‌ policies.

Popular Stories

iPhone SE 4 Vertical Camera Feature

iPhone SE 4 Production Will Reportedly Begin Ramping Up in October

Tuesday July 23, 2024 2:00 pm PDT by
Following nearly two years of rumors about a fourth-generation iPhone SE, The Information today reported that Apple suppliers are finally planning to begin ramping up mass production of the device in October of this year. If accurate, that timeframe would mean that the next iPhone SE would not be announced alongside the iPhone 16 series in September, as expected. Instead, the report...
iPhone 17 Plus Feature

iPhone 17 Lineup Specs Detail Display Upgrade and New High-End Model

Monday July 22, 2024 4:33 am PDT by
Key details about the overall specifications of the iPhone 17 lineup have been shared by the leaker known as "Ice Universe," clarifying several important aspects of next year's devices. Reports in recent months have converged in agreement that Apple will discontinue the "Plus" iPhone model in 2025 while introducing an all-new iPhone 17 "Slim" model as an even more high-end option sitting...
Generic iPhone 17 Feature With Full Width Dynamic Island

Kuo: Ultra-Thin iPhone 17 to Feature A19 Chip, Single Rear Camera, Semi-Titanium Frame, and More

Wednesday July 24, 2024 9:06 am PDT by
Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo today shared alleged specifications for a new ultra-thin iPhone 17 model rumored to launch next year. Kuo expects the device to be equipped with a 6.6-inch display with a current-size Dynamic Island, a standard A19 chip rather than an A19 Pro chip, a single rear camera, and an Apple-designed 5G chip. He also expects the device to have a...
iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Less Than Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Thursday July 25, 2024 5:43 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
icloud private relay outage

iCloud Private Relay Experiencing Outage

Thursday July 25, 2024 3:18 pm PDT by
Apple’s iCloud Private Relay service is down for some users, according to Apple’s System Status page. Apple says that the iCloud Private Relay service may be slow or unavailable. The outage started at 2:34 p.m. Eastern Time, but it does not appear to be affecting all iCloud users. Some impacted users are unable to browse the web without turning iCloud Private Relay off, while others are...

Top Rated Comments

aaronhead14 Avatar
51 months ago
This is taking things too far. There's nothing wrong or irrelevant about letting customers know where their money is going.

Apple knows their 30% is too high. They're scared.
Score: 69 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ridgero Avatar
51 months ago
Transparency is not a bad thing.
Score: 53 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mdridwan47 Avatar
51 months ago
The case against Apple's App Store Monopoly is getting stronger and stronger, thanks to Apple.

Seriously? "irrelevant" information? This is extremely relevant information especially when it comes to money.

Sellers will obviously wonder why they're getting 30% less and will assume Facebook took it. All these little things adds up to a pretty compelling case against Apple's App Monopoly.

Apple users cheered when Apple introduced more transparency to Facebook's tracking information in iOS 14 and for good reasons. But isn't Facebook doing the same thing here? Being transparent!
Score: 43 Votes (Like | Disagree)
laptech Avatar
51 months ago

An App is not the place where you should discuss details about your contracts with Apple. The user pays (in this example) $9.99. That's the relevant information.
If a user is paying for something, they have a right to know who benifits from having their money.
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ingambe Avatar
51 months ago

This is taking things too far. There's nothing wrong or irrelevant about letting customers know where their money is going.

Apple knows their 30% is too high. They're scared.
If it's too high or not is not the question, but blocking this information is a ****** behavior IMHO
Score: 36 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Marlon DLTH :) Avatar
51 months ago
I don’t like Facebook, but I’m with them on this one.

This feature is for helping small businesses doing payment transactions for their live events, and users should know where a portion of their money goes.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)