New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Powerbeats Pro vs. Powerbeats 3

Powerbeats Pro launched last week, and the first orders are now in the hands of customers. We already did a Powerbeats Pro vs. AirPods hands-on comparison, but we got requests for a video detailing how the new Powerbeats Pro compare to the previous-generation Powerbeats 3 Wireless Earphones.

Today, we're taking a look at whether it's worth upgrading to the Powerbeats Pro if you've already got the Powerbeats 3, or if it's worth spending the extra cash if you're trying to decide between the two.

Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.

Powerbeats 3 have been around for a few years now, and are available at prices as low as $90, making them much more affordable than the $250 Powerbeats Pro, but feature wise, the Powerbeats Pro pack in a lot of functionality for that extra price increase.

When it comes to design, the Powerbeats 3 and the Powerbeats Pro look rather similar as both feature earhooks to keep them in place along with in-ear earbuds that block out ambient noise, but the designs aren't quite the same.


The Powerbeats 3 have an earhook that's angled upwards and an earpiece that's slightly shorter, while the Powerbeats Pro have an earhook that better contours to the ear. The biggest design difference is, of course, the cable that connects the Powerbeats 3 as these are not wire-free headphones like the Powerbeats Pro.

A wire-free design is unquestionably better than a wired design in most situations, but a wire does make sure you're not going to lose a single earbud because they're tethered together. That might be preferable for some people.

Both Powerbeats 3 and Powerbeats Pro are comfortable thanks to the four eartips in different sizes, but we preferred the fit and the feel of the Powerbeats Pro. The new angle just gives them a better fit in the ear, but there's not a huge amount of difference between the two. The earhooks on the Powerbeats Pro seem durable and more sturdy compared to the earhooks on the Powerbeats 3, and we didn't get the impression that they're going to be prone to breakage.


Powerbeats 3 have a single physical button to power them on and off and they come with a remote on the wire for controlling media playback. Powerbeats Pro have no wire, so there are physical buttons on the earbuds themselves for controlling media and changing the volume.

Powerbeats Pro come with a battery case that provides extra power, and while the Powerbeats 3 have a case, it's a flimsy little silicone thing that's only meant to give you a way to carry them around. Powerbeats 3 boast 12 hours of battery life while Powerbeats Pro are limited to nine hours, but you do get up to 24 hours of additional battery life with the aforementioned battery case.


Powerbeats 3 have a W1 chip, much like the original AirPods, which allows for simple device pairing and switching, but it's not as simple as the Powerbeats Pro pairing. With Powerbeats Pro, you just open the case near an Apple device and the pairing process is initiated, but with Powerbeats 3, you need to hold down the power button for five seconds.

Powerbeats Pro have an updated H1 chip that allows for faster pairing than with the W1, hands-free "Hey Siri" support (you need to push a button to use Siri on Powerbeats 3), and improved range, plus the Powerbeats Pro support Bluetooth 5 so you're going to get a better connection and longer range.

As for sound, we thought the Powerbeats Pro sounded better than the Powerbeats 3 because they're more balanced. The Powerbeats 3 are bass heavy and that muddies the sound in some songs, a problem the Powerbeats Pro don't have. Powerbeats 3 don't sound bad, but they don't sound as good as Powerbeats Pro.


Sweat and water resistance is going to be a major question, and it's not something that can be addressed properly without longer periods of testing and moisture exposure over time. Powerbeats Pro have an IPX4 water resistance rating, which means they've been tested and can hold up to splashes of water, while the Powerbeats 3 have no specific Ingress Protection rating.

That suggests the Powerbeats Pro are going to better hold up to moisture than the Powerbeats 3, but it's going to take more testing and exposure to sweat over time to get a clearer picture of how durable these new earbuds are.

There have been a lot of complaints about Powerbeats 3 failing due to sweat exposure, so hopefully this is a problem adequately addressed by the sweat and water resistance Apple promises in Powerbeats Pro.

Overall, the Powerbeats 3 are fine headphones, but the Powerbeats Pro are better in almost every way. There's a huge price difference between the two, but if price isn't much of a factor and you're aiming for convenience, the Powerbeats Pro are the clear winner and are worth the purchase or the upgrade.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)

18 weeks ago

Not buying ANYTHING wireless again.
My AirPods now last less than 3 minutes... Not worth spending 170 on a device that is going to become a figurine on your table.

At last they should keep operating when the battery is dead (like in some headphones).


It's going to be a big adjustment throwing your phone in the trash.
Rating: 8 Votes
18 weeks ago

Not buying ANYTHING wireless again.
My AirPods now last less than 3 minutes... Not worth spending 170 on a device that is going to become a figurine on your table.

At last they should keep operating when the battery is dead (like in some headphones).


Good luck on "not buying anything wireless again". You sound like one of these dudes in 2008 that was ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED they would never buy a smartphone with a touch screen. I guess if you have an active eBay account, you will be able to find wired stuff for years to come!

3 minutes? So you cannot even play a single song on your AirPods? I must have been extremely lucky with my launch day AirPods still lasting several hours despite me wearing them 50+ hours a week.
Rating: 6 Votes
18 weeks ago

Not buying ANYTHING wireless again.
My AirPods now last less than 3 minutes... Not worth spending 170 on a device that is going to become a figurine on your table.

At last they should keep operating when the battery is dead (like in some headphones).



People seem to forget that cheap ($10-$90) earphones that use a wire break, a lot, because of the wire. It's usually the weak point in the earphones. I used to go through a pair every couple months, if my AirPods died tomorrow I would still have saved a significant amount of money in the last two years because they don't have the failure prone wire.

For example: The wired version of AirPods reviews. https://www.apple.com/shop/reviews/MMTN2AM/A/earpods-with-lightning-connector?page=0&rf=1

Most didn't even last a year let alone 2.
[doublepost=1557788318][/doublepost]

A pair of $170 headphones, should last more than 2 years... Im not against wireless stuff, just make sure that they have a second option (wired) or nice technology.



EarPods with 3.5 mm Headphone Plug ('https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MNHF2AM/A/earpods-with-35-mm-headphone-plug?fnode=450e041bbbd92fedab236ec893f456c218dc7aa645aa0f68b45503465f4e55c8b083f124e6ccaee29a0a9d533418d5e674b6dcbeb6eec04343e3cf8467360353fa8bb77abe8d0755d23ec594480d25425283e06236d51d1a9ed8f30a153fe1cf')

EarPods with Lightning Connector ('https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MMTN2AM/A/earpods-with-lightning-connector?fnode=bbe3464c85e6388008d141f4096e5563c213aa6d2b23ac6925fe99df3fef9a8c7752c6a42a334cd4c6ce8ffd3b922d19f79f301c937d3a288082109914eea82f476bdb483fb63c42c03d42c24defb1799cfca9e77da146b68320484ffe4b1791')
Rating: 3 Votes
18 weeks ago
I think the complete discharge requirement was for Ni-mh rechargeable batteries. Most devices now use Lithium ion batteries and do not require full discharge.

This is a rather confusing post. Am I right to translate it to mean that after x (undisclosed months/years) the batteries in your AirPods are no longer working? Also you expect a wireless device that runs on batteries to keep running when the batteries are no longer working? LOL, I wish my flashlight did that too.

The only thing I can say if x is less than 3 years or so and you did not expose them to water/sweat (they are not resistant) than you have a legitimate gripe. If x is > than 3 years or you got them wet, well that is a problem with devices without replaceable batteries and/or getting electronics that are not water resistant wet.
[doublepost=1557795206][/doublepost]

You must be right because people keep buying them. I know I have a pair of powerbeats3, love them. (OK, truthfully, I only paid $99)
[doublepost=1557795366][/doublepost]

Is that still a thing? I know years ago, battery experts used to say that about batteries. I thought that was no longer the case, starting about 10-years ago.

Rating: 3 Votes
18 weeks ago

Received my Power Beats Pro today and after listening I put them right back in the box to return to Apple. The sound quality is just blah. I'm used to the Bose Free Sound Sports and these PBP's don't even come close in sound quality. To me all the other features mean nothing unless you have optimal sound quality. And these do not have it.

This is what I was waiting to find out. Sounds like I won’t be getting them either then. I have the sennheisser momentum true wireless in ears. And they are on a par with the Bose sport or arguably better. I would have loved to have had the easy pairing though as swapping between devices is a pain. But like u say it’s sound quality first all the way.
Rating: 3 Votes
18 weeks ago
Powerbeats 3 does win in 1 area - availability numbers.
Rating: 2 Votes
18 weeks ago
Powerbeats > Airpods in my situation. My ear canals are too big and those puppies fall out way too much, so having the over the ear piece makes it actually usable for me.

PowerBeats vs Powerbeats 3... well I guess I don't care enough.
Rating: 2 Votes
18 weeks ago

I wish reviewers would start with this premise, and expand. THIS is exactly what I was trying to find out in reading this and other reviews. Since my Bose SoundSport batteries are now down to ~1.5 hours on a charge, a long hike will kill them, so I’m in the market for a replacement. I’ll keep looking for a sweat proof, comfortable, long-lasting, great sounding replacement that stays in my ears...

I'll expand since you asked. I didn't want to go on and on about a sound quality review, but since your interested I'll try and explain. I've used Bose for a long time not because I'm a Bose fanboy but they have a wonderful full range sound. They cover the full range of frequencies from the deep lows all the way to those crisp and detailed highs. It's very hard to find other headphone companies who can reproduce the sound like they do. I've tried other companies in the past and wound up returning them because of this same sound quality issue (Jaybirds, Shure, B&O, Sony) None of them reproduce that full sound like Bose does. I was really hoping these Beats were going to sound similar or better than Bose because I've only heard Beats sound great and are bass heavy. These definitely don't come close to that Bose sound. The lows are that invisible kind of bass. This is where I was most surprised because of always hearing Beats are bass heavy. In my opinion not so much. The mids are clear and detailed and are the most pronounced. So I would say Beats are more mid heavy than bass heavy. Then the highs roll off way to early. They are missing those crisp detailed high end treble notes. So your basically listening to midrange heavy headphones. My sister in law bought a pair of those TaoTronics $30 headphones from Amazon and these Beats have a very similar sound to those. In my opinion that's the closest match sound wise that the Beats remind me of. So $30 vs. $250 with similar sound doesn't cut it for me. All the chips, ease of pairing, black lightning cables means nothing to me because they are headphones meant for music to sound good. These don't do that for my ears. Hope this helped.
Rating: 2 Votes
18 weeks ago

The AirPods battery is a huge problem. I'm not paying $150 ever other year to replace them.

That is the equivalent of a subscription of $6.25/month.

If I found my AirPods so useful that I completely wore out the batteries in just 2 years, I would happily pay that much.

However as it turns out, although I do indeed love my AirPods, I'm a much lighter user of them and my batteries are all still fine after 2 years. I expect to get 5 years out of them before the battery life impacts my own use case. That brings my own monthly AirPods cost down to $2.50
Rating: 2 Votes
18 weeks ago
Not buying ANYTHING wireless again.
My AirPods now last less than 3 minutes... Not worth spending 170 on a device that is going to become a figurine on your table.

At last they should keep operating when the battery is dead (like in some headphones).
Rating: 2 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]