New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Qualcomm Expects Apple to 'Solely' Use Intel Modems for 2018 iPhones

Apple does not have plans to use Qualcomm's LTE chips in its next-generation devices, Qualcomm's CFO said today during Qualcomm's second quarter earnings call.

As relayed by CNBC, Qualcomm CFO George Davis told investors Apple will use a competitor's chips in its 2018 iPhones, likely speaking of Intel.

"We believe Apple intends to solely use our competitors' modems rather than our modems in its next iPhone release. We will continue to provide modems for Apple legacy devices," said Davis.


Over the course of the last few months, there have been mixed reports about Apple's LTE chip plans given the legal disagreement between the two companies. Respected Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said in February that Intel would be the supplier of LTE modems for all 2018 iPhones, with Apple using no Qualcomm chips.

Kuo's report was called into question in April when Fast Company said that Intel would supply Apple with 70 percent of the LTE chips needed for the 2018 iPhones while Qualcomm would provide the rest, but it appears that report was inaccurate.

Qualcomm's statement today is also in line with an October report from The Wall Street Journal suggesting Apple would eliminate Qualcomm chips from its 2018 iPhone and iPad lineup, instead using chips from Intel and perhaps MediaTek.

Apple's decision not to use Qualcomm chips in its latest crop of iPhones is understandable given the increasingly bitter legal battle the two companies have been embroiled in for more than a year.

Apple in January 2017 sued Qualcomm for $1 billion, accusing Qualcomm of charging unfair royalties for "technologies they have nothing to do with" and failing to pay quarterly rebates. Apple and its suppliers stopped paying licensing fees at that time.

While Apple insists Qualcomm charges unfair royalties, Qualcomm claims that its technology "is at the heart of every iPhone."

It didn't take long for Qualcomm to file a countersuit claiming that Apple had infringed on several of its patents. Since then, both companies have filed multiple lawsuits against one another, and Qualcomm has also sought import and export bans on some iPhones in the United States and China.

Apple has used Qualcomm chips in its iPhones for years, but until the legal dispute is resolved, the iPhone X, iPhone 8, and iPhone 8 Plus could be the last iPhones with Qualcomm chips.

Apple is rumored to be working on its own Apple-designed modem chips for future iPhones, but until its own technology is ready, Apple devices may be equipped with Intel technology.

Rumors suggest that Apple's 2018 iPhones will use Intel's XMM 7560 modems, which support both GSM and CDMA networks. Apple is said to be planning to introduce improved antenna technology for faster connection speeds and dual-SIM dual standby functionality.

Qualcomm today reported better-than-expected quarterly results with $5.6 billion in revenue and earnings of $1.01 per share. Qualcomm saw "strong demand" from Chinese device makers amid "lower demand" from Apple.

Related Roundup: iPhone XS
Buyer's Guide: iPhone XS (Buy Now)


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

21 weeks ago

Good, will end the Intel v. Qualcomm debate.


Nothing "good" about this. Apple has just decided to go with the inferior infineon/intel wireless chipset, basically out of spite.

Also, if you are going to price a phone at $1k, you better be putting in components that are worth $1k. I don’t only need a fast CPU today, as its a phone and not the 90s. The GPU, the 'wireless' chipsets / cellular speeds, battery life, and the signal strength (antenna design) are more important features of a phone.

This sort of hubris crap is the one thing I really cannot stand about apple. It's the same deal with using year old CPUs for their Mac lineups, even when the gen 9 Intel cpus are just around the corner.

Much like most of the Bay Area, Apple seems to be confusing their luck of being at the right place at the right time (i.e. iPhone 1) with some sort of ingenious success.
Rating: 18 Votes
21 weeks ago
Damn... Too bad Qualcomm makes the best modems.
Rating: 16 Votes
21 weeks ago
Good, will end the Intel v. Qualcomm debate.
Rating: 9 Votes
21 weeks ago

Make America Great Agian ! Use USA company intel

Intel's wireless product team is based in Israel.

And Qualcomm is a US company.
Rating: 7 Votes
21 weeks ago

Now Qualcomm will be suing Intel. But this is all stuff very few people at Apple care about; best to let Intel deal with it for them.


Sue for what? Intel has the rights to CDMA technology/patents via their purchase of VIA Telecom.
Rating: 7 Votes
21 weeks ago
Assuming the Intel modems work as fast, this is fine. But I have my concerns...

https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/23/qualcomm-touts-superior-cellular-performance-of-android-phones-with-snapdragon-845-chips/
Rating: 5 Votes
21 weeks ago

Make America Great Agian ! Use USA company intel


Intel's wireless product team is based in Israel.
Rating: 5 Votes
21 weeks ago
I guess if customers are fine with Apple pocketing the profit while customers suffer with poorer reception and throughput.
Rating: 5 Votes
14 weeks ago

Almost utter crap. iPhone users don't give a rats *** about such things only Android users care about a perceived change in 10% chip performance. Apple users care about ease of use, enjoyment, iMessages, smooth interface, support support support, easy transitions...... I would challenge you to find a iPhone user that knows if he has a Intel or QC chip in his phone.


It's not about the 10% speed difference. It's idiotic and uninformed to suggest that it's just an e-penis race for speedtests on the internet. The real difference is when you're at a park in the middle of the woods and the SGS 9 is getting 3mbps on LTE and the Intel iPhone 8 has no service. Or when you pull into a station on the subway and the SGS 9 pops right back onto a 30mbps LTE connection and the Intel iPhone 8 is still bumbling around trying to find service for a while. Or when you're in at a large event and the SGS 9 is able to eke out a few hundred kbps, and nothing will load on the Intel iPhone 8. That's the difference, not under good conditions when the SGS 9 pulls 140mbps and the Intel iPhone 8 pulls 100mbps and no one really cares.

Nothing "good" about this. Apple has just decided to go with the inferior infineon/intel wireless chipset, basically out of spite.

Also, if you are going to price a phone at $1k, you better be putting in components that are worth $1k. I don’t only need a fast CPU today, as its a phone and not the 90s. The GPU, the 'wireless' chipsets / cellular speeds, battery life, and the signal strength (antenna design) are more important features of a phone.

This sort of hubris crap is the one thing I really cannot stand about apple. It's the same deal with using year old CPUs for their Mac lineups, even when the gen 9 Intel cpus are just around the corner.

Much like most of the Bay Area, Apple seems to be confusing their luck of being at the right place at the right time (i.e. iPhone 1) with some sort of ingenious success.


Yup. Very well said. It's unfortunate that Intel iPhones have worse reception and worse LTE performance than Qualcomm iPhones.

I haven't noticed any real-world improvements over the years in the speed of my LTE modems. The iPhone 5 was the first generation to have one and it was okay. Newer modems have added newer bands which helps with building penetration. But when it comes to average speed, my iPhone 5 would get 20-40Mbps. My iPhone 6 Plus got 20-40Mbps. My iPhone 6s got 20-40Mbps. My iPhone 7 got 20-40Mbps. My iPhone X gets 20-40Mbps. And my iPhone X2 whatever will get 20-40Mbps.


Go back and test that iPhone 5 today. It probably won't get 20-40mbps. Newer modems have significantly increased speed, some of which has been taken back by capacity constraints. MIMO and CA have increased capacity to keep speeds decent on congested networks and in weak signal areas.

Intel is just as capable


No. You're literally wrong. Intel modems have been proven to be inferior to Qualcomm.
Rating: 4 Votes
21 weeks ago
Another slam dunk prediction from Ming-Chi Kuo.

KGI Expects Intel to Be Exclusive Supplier of Modems in 2018 iPhones ('https://www.macrumors.com/2018/02/04/kgi-intel-exclusive-modem-supplier-2018-iphones/')


Intel's modems are a half generation behind Qualcomm, but with Gigabit LTE and 4x4 MIMO on the current products, they're extremely competitive. Intel is about a year behind Qualcomm in terms of 5G, but Apple doesn't need to adopt the bleeding edge modems.
Rating: 3 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]