Apple Countersues Qualcomm for Patent Infringement Related to Snapdragon Chips - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Countersues Qualcomm for Patent Infringement Related to Snapdragon Chips

In the ongoing legal feud between Apple and LTE chipmaker Qualcomm, Reuters reports today that Apple has made the latest move by filing a countersuit against Qualcomm and claiming that the supplier's Snapdragon chips -- used in many Android devices -- infringe on the Cupertino company's patents.

The countersuit is Apple's retaliation against Qualcomm after the latter company sought iPhone and iPad import bans in the United States over the summer. At the time, Qualcomm alleged that Apple infringed on six Qualcomm patents related to carrier aggregation and technologies that were designed to allow iPhones to save battery life while communicating. Apple denied any of these claims and said that Qualcomm's patents were "invalid."

qualcomm iphone
Apple's new countersuit further revises its answer to Qualcomm's complaint from July by adding on the accusation of patent infringement surrounding the Snapdragon chips. The filing alleges that Apple owns "at least" eight battery life patents Qualcomm has violated, related to making sure that each part of the phone's processor draws only minimum power needed to function, powering down parts of the processor when not needed, and ensuring that sleep and wake functions work better for the user.

Apple specifically says that Qualcomm's Snapdragon 800 and 820 processors -- included in Samsung and Google smartphones -- infringe on these patents, but Apple has only named Qualcomm in its counter lawsuit. The specific monetary damages Apple is looking for were not disclosed.

Apple Inc on Thursday filed a countersuit against Qualcomm Inc, alleging that Qualcomm’s Snapdragon mobile phone chips that power a wide variety of Android-based devices infringe on Apple’s patents, the latest development in a long-running dispute.

“Apple began seeking those patents years before Qualcomm began seeking the patents it asserts against Apple in this case,” the company wrote in its complaint.

2017 has seen rebuttal after rebuttal in the Apple versus Qualcomm legal battle, kicking off in January when the FTC complained that Qualcomm had engaged in anticompetitive patent licensing practices. Soon after, Apple sued Qualcomm for $1 billion, accusing the company of charging unfair royalties for "technologies they have nothing to do with" and refusing to pay quarterly rebates. A Qualcomm countersuit followed in April, and the dispute escalated throughout the year with expanded lawsuits and claims lodged by each side.

Over the summer, Qualcomm began facing an additional lawsuit from the United States Federal Trade Commission, happening separately from the dispute with Apple but covering many of the same anticompetitive tactics that Apple claims in its own lawsuit.

Popular Stories

OpenAI vs Apple Feature

Report: Apple's OpenAI Lawsuit Threatens iPhone Rival Plans

Monday July 13, 2026 9:31 am PDT by
OpenAI's ambitions to build a hardware rival to the iPhone are already running into trouble because of Apple's trade secret lawsuit, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who argues the damage is showing up well before any court ruling. Apple sued OpenAI last week, accusing the company of pushing former employees, and even people it was trying to recruit, to hand over details on unreleased...
OpenAI vs Apple Feature

OpenAI: No Evidence Apple's Trade Secret Complaint Has Merit

Tuesday July 14, 2026 1:45 pm PDT by
OpenAI says it is "not aware" of any evidence that Apple's allegations of trade secret theft have merit in a statement provided to Bloomberg. While we take these allegations seriously, we're not aware of any evidence that this complaint has merit. We believe in fair competition and allowing people the freedom to work wherever they choose, and we're focused on building innovative technology...
General macOS Mail Feature

Apple Sued Over Reported 'Hide My Email' Flaw

Thursday July 16, 2026 10:11 am PDT by
Apple this week was sued over a reported "Hide My Email" flaw that could expose a user's real email address. The proposed class action lawsuit alleges that Apple violated California's false advertising law and other consumer protection statutes by knowingly offering a feature that does not work as advertised. A security researcher disclosed the apparent "Hide My Email" vulnerability to Apple...

Top Rated Comments

114 months ago
Apple the King of patent trolls strikes again, hopefully justice will prevail in favor of Qualcomm.
"patent troll"

You use that phrase, but I'm not sure you know what it means.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
114 months ago
Oh I know what it means
Sure about that?


patent troll
noun
informal, derogatory
[LIST=1]
* a company that obtains the rights to one or more patents in order to profit by means of licensing or litigation, rather than by producing its own goods or services.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
keysofanxiety Avatar
114 months ago
Apple the King of patent trolls strikes again, hopefully justice will prevail in favor of Qualcomm.
Oh brother :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cmaier Avatar
114 months ago
Oh I know what it means, I'm just not blinded with unwavering and.absolute loyalty to a brand like most people here who screech patent troll every time someone sues Apple while defending every lawsuit Apple starts.
By definition Apple can’t be a patent troll, as they sell products that use their patents.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
114 months ago
Apple the King of patent trolls strikes again, hopefully justice will prevail in favor of Qualcomm.
LOL. This dude has no idea.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
thisisnotmyname Avatar
114 months ago
oh snap... dragon
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)