Skip to Content

Android Phones With Qualcomm Modems Top iPhone 16e in New 5G Test

A new Cellular Insights report commissioned by Qualcomm has found that two unnamed Android smartphone models equipped with Qualcomm's Snapdragon X75 and Snapdragon X80 modems achieved faster 5G speeds compared to the iPhone 16e, which is equipped with Apple's first-ever, custom-designed C1 modem.

Apple iPhone 16e C1 Feature
Testing was conducted with T-Mobile's sub-6GHz 5G network in New York City, across a variety of real-world environments, according to Cellular Insights.

The report found that the Android devices "consistently outperformed" the iPhone 16e in terms of 5G connectivity, especially indoors. Specifically, the Android devices achieved up to 35% faster download speeds compared to the iPhone 16e, and up to 91% faster upload speeds. The report also found that the iPhone 16e frequently became hot to the touch during testing, but it could not confirm if this directly impacted performance.

The two Android smartphones were priced at $619 and $799 in the U.S., the report said, while the iPhone 16e starts at $599.

Based on its findings, Cellular Insights concluded that the Qualcomm-powered devices "hold a clear edge" over the iPhone 16e for individuals seeking "consistent, high-throughput 5G performance." Qualcomm's PR department is now touting the favorable results, which they relayed to us in an email sent earlier today.

The full report is available as a PDF.

Apple's C1 modem achieved equal to faster performance than some Qualcomm modems in some earlier tests, but a Qualcomm spokesperson said this study is the "only comprehensive, scientific" comparison completed on a U.S. network so far.

Performance is not the only metric that matters for a smartphone modem, with power efficiency also being an important factor. Apple has advertised the C1 modem as being the most power-efficient iPhone modem ever, which contributes to the iPhone 16e offering the longest battery life of any 6.1-inch iPhone model ever. With its next-generation C2 and C3 modems, Apple hopes to continue to close the gap on the performance front.

Tags: C1, Qualcomm
Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
HomePod mini and Apple TV Sage

New Apple TV and HomePod Mini Are Still Missing, Here's Why

Thursday March 5, 2026 6:11 am PST by
Apple this week unveiled seven products, ranging from the iPhone 17e to the MacBook Neo, but new Apple TV and HomePod mini models were not among them. Given that there have been rumors about the next-generation Apple TV and HomePod mini since all the way back in late 2024, some customers are wondering why the devices have yet to launch, and the answer likely relates to Siri. In September, ...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...

Top Rated Comments

10 months ago
Oh really? A company that's been doing radio chips for decades is going to outperform the company that just dipped its toes into radio chips?
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago

If this is not yet mm wave but C1 modem already lost, how much more when tested using mm wave?
Does it really matter?
MMWave is barely available outside of some stadiums and college campuses, and as far as I know, has never been available on an iPhone outside of the US.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
Apple's focus was power efficiency, not speed (and to not have to pay licensing fees)

"C1 is the first modem designed by Apple and the most power-efficient modem ever on an iPhone, delivering fast and reliable 5G cellular connectivity. Apple silicon — including C1 — the all-new internal design, and the advanced power management of iOS 18 all contribute to extraordinary battery life"

I haven't seen anything official from Apple claiming the C1 was faster, and didn't put it in the Flagship phones (yet at least)
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AppleFan91 Avatar
10 months ago

A new Cellular Insights report ('https://cellularinsights.com/comparative-5g-performance-report-android-smartphones-vs-iphone-16e/') commissioned by Qualcomm has found that two unnamed…
Not that I am disputing the results on this, but I feel like this at least raises questions regarding the objectivity of this test…
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Gengar Avatar
10 months ago
The C1 only supports 3X carrier aggregation, so it's not surprising it's being outperformed by Qualcomm modems on T-Mobile's network, when T-Mobile has widely deployed 4X Carrier Aggregation (normally n71, n25, and two channels of n41) and will be rolling out 5X carrier aggregation in areas they have c-band/n77.

The C1 performed well on AT&T and Verizon because they mostly have 3 or fewer channels being aggregated (AT&T usually has n5 and two channels of n77, while Verizon usually has two channels of n77).

The study even says they couldn't confirm (on page 4) if the iPhone supported 4X carrier aggregation like the Qualcomm modems, but it's widely known that it doesn't ('https://www.ookla.com/articles/apples-c1-modem-early-adopters').
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
10 months ago

It's all over Columbus.
He died over 500 years ago, though.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)