Spotify Executive Justifies Antitrust Pressure on Apple and Calls for Other App Store Payment Providers

Spotify executive Horacio Gutierrez has explained in a wide-reaching interview with The Verge why the company believes Apple is a "ruthless bully" and what it would like to see change.

Apple vs Spotify feature2
Last month, Gutierrez penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal that chastised Apple and some of its business practices. Now, Spotify's head of global affairs and chief legal officer has expanded on the logic behind the company's antitrust dispute with Apple.

Gutierrez's main justification underpinning the argument that Apple's App Store payment system is not a necessary part of its business is that it "wasn't part of the ‌App Store‌ in the beginning."

Concretely, when it comes to the App Store, it is very clear that the choice to tie Apple's proprietary payment system to the App Store was an arbitrary choice. It wasn't part of the App Store in the beginning, just as the 30 percent Apple tax wasn't a requirement when we made it into the App Store. They bolted that on later in the process and in doing that, they created this environment in which competing apps really have to contend with Apple's own music streaming service as well as other competing products on what's not really a level playing field.

Apple's 30 percent commission on ‌App Store‌ sales and in-app purchases was also raised as an "arbitrary rate," and Gutierrez explained that it is not merely a reduction in commission that Spotify is looking to achieve.

The issue is not whether the rate is 30 or 15 or 10 percent, the issue is that the rate is arbitrary and they get to set it unilaterally because they've insulated themselves from competition. What should happen is Apple should be able to charge 30, or 50 percent, if they can convince users in a market economy that the value that they provide justifies the 30 percent, or the 15 percent, or the 50 percent. What we're saying is they actually prevent competitors from coming in and offering alternative payment systems, and therefore there is no market.

Gutierrez explained that Spotify would like to see Apple return to its previous approach with the ‌App Store‌ and loosen its grip on rules and penalties.

We want Apple to go back to the situation that existed at the time when we joined the App Store. We want them to undo the tying of their proprietary payment system to the App Store and all of the other anti-steering provisions, which is a fancy way of saying punishments and penalties that they've created for those people who do not want to use their proprietary payment system. Basically, restore the situation to the way it was before their anti-competitive abuse started.

Specifically, Gutierrez said that the market should be able to choose from a selection of payment systems on the ‌App Store‌, and that Apple should be able to contend with other payment technology in a more competitive environment.

There is a monopoly on payment systems, which is why they can afford to impose the 30 percent. Let the market decide. Enable PayPal and Mastercard and other new payment systems to come in and then let users decide, vote with their dollars on whether Apple's technology is so superior when it comes to payment and all these other things that they’re willing to pay 30 percent more.

Addressing criticisms that Apple's rules and fees are valid given it built and maintains the ‌App Store‌ and the devices apps run on, Gutierrez explained that Spotify believes this should not be a reason to allow anticompetitive conduct.

There is no reason why a platform provider that's supposed to be a neutral platform provider like Apple would be allowed to create conditions that would force companies like ours to have to make that choice. They say, "Well, but we built it." Yeah, you built it. But when you built it it wasn't like that. It was significantly built on the backs of the work of many app developers that came to the App Store that you touted as the reason why people should come and use your platform. And whether you built it or not, it really doesn't matter from an antitrust perspective. The railroad companies built the railroads, the steel companies built the steel mills, and the telephone companies built the telephone lines… The biggest cases in the history of antitrust enforcement in the U.S. had to do with companies that had built that infrastructure and then used the power that that control gave them to hurt competitors.

In April, the European Commission found that Apple had breached EU competition law with ‌Apple Music‌ and the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee questioned Apple's App Store policies.

See the full transcript of The Verge's interview with Gutierrez for more information.

Tag: Spotify

Top Rated Comments

_Spinn_ Avatar
16 weeks ago
I absolutely do not want other payment options in apps. I don’t want to give my payment info to every app under the sun and risk potential data leaks where my credit card number gets stolen. I trust Apple to keep my payment info secure.
Score: 30 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WaffleBoi_15 Avatar
16 weeks ago
Not surprising the company known for not paying artists doesn’t wanna pay the Apple tax either. Greedy bastards.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dscottbuch Avatar
16 weeks ago
It seems that everyone wants to skip over the fact that the underlying premise is false. Apple does NOT have a monopoly in any pre-apple definition of the term. There are many alternatives, Android being the most obvious and even larger market share than iOS/Apple. What Apple has is the most lucrative market for app providers, that's all. While those arguing can try and put lipstick on the pig with mis-direction and appeals to the emotion of the underdog (although how multi million, or billion, $ companies can be underdogs I'm not sure) the bottom line is this is all, and only about profits. Every app maker on iOS makes good to very good incremental profits by being on iOS, else they wouldn't be there. They don't need to be on iOS to exist as there are competitors to iOS App Store, in which these same companies make profits.

The argument that Apple has a price advantage is also unprovable and likely specious. App Store charges 30% for use of all the facilities the App Store provide, not just the payment system. I seriously doubt that any one of these companies could put together the marketing, tech, etc. for an App Store for anything approaching what they pay Apple.

Also, where is it decreed that iOS is a 'neutral' platform like the railways. Railways used public lands and provided very little added value (read technology) beyond the rails themselves (and some safety and use rules). iOS is an Apple platform which has been opened up under very clear rules promulgated by its owner, Apple.

One again, Spotify, Fortnight/Epic, ... don't have to be on iOS. There are literally billions of other devices out there on which to build a business. They fact that they have chosen, note - chosen, to be in iOS is because they make $ there, a lot of $. This is, once again, only and all about more $ ( on both sides by the way but Apple if very forthright on that. Tim Cook said it, we need to monetize our IP).
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Hayden_ Avatar
16 weeks ago
Someone is mad about lossless audio :oops:
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
thejadedmonkey Avatar
16 weeks ago

The biggest cases in the history of antitrust enforcement in the U.S. had to do with companies that had built that infrastructure and then used the power that that control gave them to hurt competitors.
That's a very good argument. Kudos to Spotify's lawyers.

Now hopefully with the money saved, they can use it to hire more developers. You hear that, Spotify? I want Spotify Connect to work on my Homepod! :D
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
kcslc Avatar
16 weeks ago

I absolutely do not want other payment options in apps. I don’t want to give my payment info to every app under the sun and risk potential data leaks where my credit card number gets stolen. I trust Apple to keep my payment info secure.
I do want alternatives. Why can’t we have choices?
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Top Stories

app store safe secure

Study Finds Up to 2% of Top 1,000 Paid Apps on App Store Were Scams

Monday June 7, 2021 6:33 am PDT by
Apple has used its app review process as a bulwark in recent legal assaults on its App Store policy, and put particular emphasis on the security benefits for iOS users when buying apps. However, an investigation has found that almost 2% of the top 1,000 highest grossing apps on a given day were some sort of scam. According to The Washington Post, which conducted the investigation, scam apps...
European Commisssion

EU Prepares to Charge Apple in Antitrust Dispute With Spotify

Thursday March 4, 2021 8:57 am PST by
EU regulators are in the process of finalizing a charge sheet against Apple, initiated by an antitrust complaint from Spotify (via Reuters). In 2019, Spotify filed a complaint with the European Commission, alleging that Apple enforces App Store rules that "purposely limit choice and stifle innovation at the expense of the user experience," accusing the company of "acting as both a player...
app store blue banner spotfiy

Spotify Calls Apple's App Store Restrictions 'An Abusive Power Grab'

Wednesday April 21, 2021 4:24 pm PDT by
At an App Store antitrust hearing that took place today, Spotify and Match Group (the company behind Tinder) accused Apple of abusing its App Store powers to to disadvantage rival services, reports Bloomberg. Spotify chief Legal Officer Horacio Gutierrez said that Apple's rules are "nothing more than an abusive power grab." "Apple abuses its dominant position as a gatekeeper of the App Store...
European Commisssion

Apple in Breach of EU Competition Law, European Commission Finds

Friday April 30, 2021 3:39 am PDT by
Apple has been found to be in breach of EU competition law with Apple Music, according to the preliminary findings of the European Commission. The charges relate to a two-year-old antitrust dispute initiated by Spotify. The European Commission was expected to bring charges against Apple over concerns that its App Store rules break EU competition law this week, and ahead of a formal verdict,...
timcookantitrust

Tim Cook 'Practicing for Hours' Ahead of Epic Games Testimony Expected This Week

Monday May 17, 2021 4:17 am PDT by
So far, Apple CEO Tim Cook has taken a backseat in defending Apple as it faces a significant legal battle with Epic Games regarding the App Store. While the CEO has commented on the platform in the past, for the first time this week, Tim Cook will take center stage in his company's battle with Epic Games. Apple in March submitted its list of executives that will testify during the trial...
app store blue banner

App Store Ecosystem Responsible for Estimated $643 Billion in Billings and Sales in 2020, According to Apple-Commissioned Study

Wednesday June 2, 2021 10:00 am PDT by
The App Store ecosystem facilitated an estimated $643 billion in billings and sales in 2020, an increase of 24 percent year-over-year, according to an Apple-commissioned study done by Analysis Group economists. [PDF] The study, "A Global Perspective on the Apple App Store Ecosystem," comes as Apple awaits a decision in its ongoing trial with Epic Games, much of which focused on App Store...
spotify hifi icon

Spotify HiFi Icon Spotted in Mobile App Suggests Imminent Launch

Tuesday May 18, 2021 5:22 am PDT by
Spotify in February announced plans to introduce a new "HiFi" premium tier sometime in 2021, and while the company declined to offer a date, there's reason to believe a launch could be imminent, especially in the wake of Apple Music's lossless tier announcement on Monday. In a timely discovery, hints of Spotify's lossless HiFi audio streaming service have again been spotted this week by...
General Snapcaht Apps Feature 2

Snap is 'Happy' to Pay Apple's 30% Commission Rate, Says Evan Spiegel

Friday May 21, 2021 9:36 am PDT by
Snap CEO Evan Spiegel today told CNBC that his company is "happy" to pay Apple's 30 percent cut of in-app purchases because of the benefits that Apple provides with its software and hardware. We really feel like Snapchat wouldn't exist without the iPhone and without the amazing platform that Apple has created. In that sense, I'm not sure we have a choice about paying the 30% fee, and of...
European Commisssion

EU Likely to Charge Apple With Anti-Competitive Behavior This Week

Tuesday April 27, 2021 2:06 am PDT by
The European Commission will this week bring charges against Apple over concerns that its App Store rules break EU competition law, reports the Financial Times. The charges relate to a two-year-old antitrust dispute with Spotify. Margrethe Vestager, the EU's competition chief, will late this week publicly issue charges against Apple over concerns that the rules it sets for developers on its...
parler app

Parler Returns to the App Store With Improved Moderation

Monday May 17, 2021 7:43 am PDT by
The controversial social media app Parler has today returned to the App Store, several months after Apple suspended it for breach of App Store rules. Parler was removed from the App Store in January because Apple said that it failed to take "adequate measures to address the proliferation" of "threats to people's safety." According to the Washington Post, Parler has now implemented a...