Apple Hits Back at Supplier Imagination for 'Inaccurate and Misleading' Statements in Contract Dispute

Apple today hit back at disgruntled chipmaker Imagination Technologies for questioning whether it can develop new graphics technology without using the supplier's intellectual property, calling the British firm's response to Apple's decision to part ways with it "disappointing, inaccurate, and misleading."

Back in April, Imagination Technologies announced that Apple had told the U.K. firm it planned to stop using its graphics processors in consumer devices over the next two years. The news came as a shock to investors and the company's shares fell by 60 percent on the day.

imagination technologies logo
At the same time, the company criticized Apple, claiming that it doubted the tech giant could go it alone without violating Imagination's patents, intellectual property, and confidential information. One month later, the company opened a "dispute resolution procedure" with Apple after failing to resolve the disagreement.

On Friday, Apple responded to the graphics chip supplier by claiming that the firm had known for nearly two years that it was winding down the relationship. In an email statement received by Bloomberg, Apple said it first informed Imagination in late 2015 that it would no longer be buying the U.K. company's latest technology, but that it would still use its older systems.

Apple claimed that it told Imagination in 2016 that it was further reducing the relationship by initiating a clause in its contract that allows Apple to pay a lower royalty rate for using a smaller amount of intellectual property. By February 2017, Apple said it had told Imagination it was ending the relationship altogether and would no longer be making any royalty payments in up to two years' time.

Apple's statement contradicts those made by Imagination, notes Bloomberg. Last week, Imagination CEO Andrew Heath said the company was informed by Apple at the end of March "that they were certain" that products to be released in 2018 or early 2019 will no longer use Imagination's intellectual property. But Apple claimed the firm had known for longer.

"We began working with Imagination in 2007 and stopped accepting new IP from them in 2015," Apple said. "After lengthy discussions we advised them on February 9 that we expected to wind down our licensing agreement since we need unique and differentiating IP for our products. We valued our past relationship and wanted to give them as much notice as possible to adapt their future plans."

Imagination has yet to comment on Apple's statement, but the supplier's shares fell by up to 8 percent on Friday U.K. trading.

News that Apple would no longer be relying on its processors delivered a major blow to Imagination Technologies, which traditionally provides the PowerVR graphics architecture found in Apple's full range of iOS devices and receives a small royalty on every sale, which amounts to up to half of the British firm's revenue.

The company put itself up for sale in June. The formal sale process is still ongoing, despite a successful restructuring and a return to profitability for the company. Apple is unlikely to make an offer, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke to Bloomberg.

Top Rated Comments

Quu Avatar
69 months ago
Why most companies wind up overacting against Apple?
Apple is the kind of company that only uses you long enough to learn how your technology works and then once they devise a way to get around your patents, shut you out and replicate the functionality of your solution. Alternatively they just buy you. Like they did with Siri, TouchID and so on.

EDIT:// I can see I rattled a lot of cages with this comment. Many of you replying are saying things like "welcome to capitalism" and "that's what every company does". And to that I say, well duh, that's what I just explained with my comment, it's the entire reason imagination is salty.
Score: 28 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kaibelf Avatar
69 months ago
This is a situation where both parties are probably in the right.

1) I think that Apple felt obligated to give Imagination fair notice that they were planning to pull the rug out from under their feet, so that Imagination wouldn't feel like the rug was being pulled out from under their feet.

2) Nevertheless, the rug was pulled out from under Imagination's feet. The notice itself resulted in financial collapse. From their standpoint, they think their IP is so strong that they'll discover Apple still owes them licensing fees for whatever tech it eventually unveils. Maybe they'll be right and maybe they'll be wrong. But the problem for them is that's all in the future. Right now, those products only exist in the form of a warning that they WILL exist. And really, I think that the recent statements made by Imagination were very truthful and correct from their standpoint. They really have been putting their ducks in order and improving their business, and it's no doubt frustrating to them that they can't even verify whether or not Apple will or won't infringe their IP.

3) But this last statement by Apple is problematic for me. I seems churlish. In trying to defend itself, Apple is showing a complete lack of balance. They're saying "we totally did the right thing and those guys are lying"... but really what's happening is that the Apple statement just wants to ignore the damaging impact its warning had. Apple needs to have acknowledged the unfortunate results of their initial warning but then added that said warning was the right thing to do, in order to prepare a company whose business they valued, adding that a last minute surprise would have been worse. Then they could say they regretted the unpredictable and unforgiving nature of the market.
1. It'a not "pulling the rug out from under their feet" to simply change their supply chain (with PLENTY of notice). The entire concept of pulling a rug out from someone is that you surprise them without any warning. Are you "pulling the rug out from under the feet" of the servers at a restaurant if you find a different one you prefer and start going there instead? Do you somehow owe them lifetime business patronage?

2. I don't know what the value of my 401(k) will be in 5 years either. Should I be throwing a fit because I am not being informed? Imagination is crying about pure speculation with nothing to back it up, and the idea that Apple should clue them in to their internal trade secrets as they exit doing business with them is, at best, laughable.

3. So Imagination makes a series of accusations, then a series of threats, then complains to the press about how they are somehow victims because their gravy train is ending after being fattened up for a decade unnaturally and failing to diversify with that opportunity, and when Apple finally responds by saying that IT aren't being honest, somehow it's "churlish" and "lacking balance?" I'm not sure if you work for Imagination or some relative of yours does or something, but in the real world, people change vendors all the time, and in business, much like in life, no one owes you anything forever. Apple signed a deal, everyone made money, and then the deal ended, and they are moving on. I'm sorry that Imagination was too lazy and incompetent to get their house in order and idiotically assumed that their business would last forever, but that's frankly not Apple's problem, and last I checked Apple, and all corporations, are not there to serve as soup kitchens.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gnasher729 Avatar
69 months ago
Speaking from a position of complete ignorance and lack of understanding here, why did this company make this dramatic announcement that ended up shocking investors and hurting their share value? That decision seems counter to their interests.

Is there a larger strategic advantage to such an announcement that I'm overlooking? Was it required by law?
The share value is hurt because Apple will stop buying chips from them. That can't be kept a secret. There sales numbers in 2019 will be down. I don't know about the UK laws; if it was a US company they would have to tell investors, but people would have found out anyway.

In the end, they are much better off as if Apple had never been a customer. Share price was low in 2007 and went up due to the Apple deal. Now its 2017 and the share price went down due to the end of the deal. In the meantime, the company made loads of money.
[doublepost=1499427940][/doublepost]
There must be something going on at Apple for them to suddenly screw over or not pay their core suppliers for GPU (Imagination), radio baseband (Qualcomm), power management (Dialogic), etc.
There is one thing going on at Apple: They developed their own graphics chips, they have plenty of hardware engineers to do that, and they are not suddenly screwing over Imagination; they told them two years ago that they won't need Imagination's IP anymore, so they won't be paying anymore.

Apple isn't screwing over Qualcomm. Qualcomm have been screwing over Apple for a while, and Apple had enough of it. Qualcomm has also been screwing over Samsung for a while, and Samsung had enough of it as well.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mi7chy Avatar
69 months ago
There must be something going on at Apple for them to suddenly screw over or not pay their core suppliers for GPU (Imagination), radio baseband (Qualcomm), power management (Dialog), etc.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kaibelf Avatar
69 months ago
I guess it is required to inform shareholders about this sort of things.
Maybe they postponed the announcement as long as they could, but eventually they had to make it public.
They didn’t just inform shareholders. They also accused Apple of some kind of theft and demanded to know how they could possibly use another solution. It came across as desperate and juvenile, like a post-breakup post on Facebook by an angry middle school girl.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
morcutt11 Avatar
69 months ago
As a business owner I can tell you that anytime a majority your revenue is driven by just one or two customers, you're going to eventually have a problem. It was on Imagination to grow their business beyond Apple and that didn't happen. As for Apple using companies products/IP and eventually dumping them, why wouldn't they? When Apple initially launched the iPhone, they had no intellectual capital or IP for a vast majority of the technologies used by the phone. As such they pay royalties everywhere as everyone wants a piece of the action. Over they years, Apple has developed its own technology and evolved it to the ever-changing needs of their product. As such it is natural that they would eventually move away from some suppliers, pulling some work in-house. Additionally, it isn't surprising to see new suppliers come on board as a result of the technology evolution and changing needs of the iPhone platform.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

USB C Over Lightning Feature

EU Passes Law to Switch iPhone to USB-C by End of 2024

Tuesday October 4, 2022 3:30 am PDT by
The European Parliament today voted overwhelmingly in favor of enforcing USB-C as a common charging port across a wide range of consumer electronic devices, including the iPhone and AirPods, by the end of 2024. The proposal, known as a directive, forces all consumer electronics manufacturers who sell their products in Europe to ensure that a wide range of devices feature a USB-C port. This...
ipad pro purple

Five Apple Products You Should Avoid Buying Right Now

Wednesday October 5, 2022 2:12 pm PDT by
Rumors suggest that Apple still has several new devices that are coming before the end of the year, including a range of Macs and iPads. It's not looking like we're going to get an October event in 2022, but refreshes are coming soon, probably via press release. If you're planning to buy a Mac or an iPad, make sure to check out our list to know what's safe to pick up now and what's not. iPad ...
General iOS 16 Feature Yellow

10 New iOS 16 Features Coming Later This Year

Monday October 3, 2022 2:41 pm PDT by
iOS 16 was released to the public three weeks ago with a customizable Lock Screen, the ability to edit iMessages, improvements to Focus modes, and much more. And in the coming months, iPhone and iPad users have even more new features to look forward to. We've rounded up 10 new features coming to the iPhone and iPad later this year, according to Apple. Many of the features are part of iOS...
magsafe charger orange

Apple Releases New MagSafe Charger Firmware

Tuesday October 4, 2022 12:09 pm PDT by
Apple today released updated firmware for the MagSafe Charger that is designed to work with the iPhone 12 and later and the AirPods Pro 2. The new firmware is version 10M1821, up from the prior 10M229 firmware. Note that in the Settings app, you'll see a different version number than the firmware number, with the update displayed as version 255.0.0.0 (the prior firmware was 247.0.0.0). The...
maxresdefault

Video: AirPods Pro 2 vs. Bose QuietComfort II

Monday October 3, 2022 12:50 pm PDT by
Apple on September 23 officially launched the second-generation version of the AirPods Pro, introducing updated Active Noise Cancellation, Adaptive Transparency, improved sound, and more. Right around the same time, Bose introduced new QuietComfort II earbuds with many similar features, so we thought we'd compare the two to see which has the edge. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for ...
General iOS 16 Feature Yellow

One of iOS 16's Best Features Drains Battery When Enabled

Thursday October 6, 2022 2:15 am PDT by
One of iOS 16's most praised features comes at the cost of draining battery life, according to recently published Apple support documents. The feature, known as "keyboard haptics," is optional in iOS 16 and allows users to get physical feedback via slight vibrations upon the touch of each key, confirming that it was pressed much like keyboard sounds. The feature is a useful addition to the...
aapl logo banner

No October Apple Event Expected Despite Upcoming Wave of New Devices

Wednesday October 5, 2022 2:33 am PDT by
Apple is no longer expected to host an event this month, despite plans to unveil a host of new devices including new iPad and Mac models, according to recent reports. In recent months, Apple has been expected to hold an event in October to announce a range of products that did not receive any stage time during the company's iPhone 14 unveiling event last month. In a recent newsletter, Bloombe...
iOS 16

Apple Preparing iOS 16.0.3 With More Bug Fixes Following iPhone 14 Launch

Monday October 3, 2022 7:53 am PDT by
iOS 16.0.2 was released last month with several bug fixes for iPhone 14 issues, excessive copy and paste permission prompts, and more. Now, evidence suggests that Apple is planning to release iOS 16.0.3 with additional bug fixes. Evidence of an upcoming iOS 16.0.3 software update has shown up in MacRumors analytics logs, which have been a reliable indicator in the past. There are several...
iOS 16

Apple Seeds New Betas of iOS 16.1 and iPadOS 16.1 to Developers [Update: Public Beta Available]

Tuesday October 4, 2022 10:06 am PDT by
Apple today seeded the fourth beta of iOS 16.1 to developers for testing purposes, with the beta coming one week after the release of the third iOS 16.1 beta. The iOS 16.1 beta is also joined by the fifth beta of iPadOS 16.1, which is on a slightly different schedule as Apple started testing it prior to the launch of iOS 16. Registered developers can download the iOS 16‌ and iPadOS 16...
dynamic island outline 1

iOS 16.1 Beta Adds More Pronounced Gray Border Around Dynamic Island When Using Black Wallpapers or in Dark Mode

Tuesday October 4, 2022 11:58 am PDT by
With the latest iOS 16.1 beta, Apple has tweaked the design of the Dynamic Island on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max to make it more visible on a dark background. When using a darker wallpaper or with the darker interface of Dark Mode activated, there is a light gray border around the outside of the Dynamic Island when the screen is dimmed or when the Dynamic Island is in active use. The...