Skip to Content

Apple Paid $500,000 for Exclusive Access to Chance the Rapper's 'Coloring Book' Mixtape

Apple Music Android iconIn a series of tweets shared this morning, artist Chance the Rapper gave some insight into how Apple Music exclusives work for artists. His mixtape, Coloring Book, was an Apple Music exclusive for two weeks after it launched in 2016.

To garner exclusive rights to Coloring Book, Chance the Rapper says Apple paid him a total of $500,000 and funded a commercial designed to promote the new album. In exchange, Apple had sole access to offer Coloring Book for a two week period, at which point it became available on other music services.

Apple has done multiple exclusive launches since the debut of Apple Music in 2015, but until now, there's been very little insight into what Apple offers artists to entice them to offer up exclusives on the music service. Prior to now, both artists and Apple have kept deal terms tightly under wraps.

Apple has inked exclusive deals with a wide range of artists, from Drake and Taylor Swift to Frank Ocean, The Weeknd, and Katy Perry.

Labels and other streaming services have expressed displeasure with Apple's push for exclusive content, and one music group, UMG, has even banned its artists from agreeing to Apple Music exclusives. Apple Music rival Spotify has also allegedly punished artists who make deals with Apple, refusing to include them on featured playlists.

Chance the Rapper says he shared the info because he wants to "remain transparent." He went on to say artists can gain a lot from streaming wars by remaining in control of their own product (Chance the Rapper is not signed to a label). "If you come across opportunities to work with good people, pick up cash and keep your integrity, I say Do It," he wrote on Twitter in reference to Apple Music.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...

Top Rated Comments

LordQ Avatar
117 months ago
I'd rather they invested that money on battery technology research or something more... technological.
Score: 44 Votes (Like | Disagree)
117 months ago
Well at least we have an idea now of where all the money is going.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kaibelf Avatar
117 months ago
only to be available on every piracy site for free 1 minute later and missing out on all those users willing to "pay" for it on other streaming services. idiots
Not everyone steals things.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
RichTF Avatar
117 months ago
I'm sure the stockholders are thrilled with such a well thought out use of their money.
What a waste. They wouldn't even make a return on that investment. But oh well, i'm sure people like exclusives more than new Macs.
What's your point? By that logic Apple should give me $100,000 just because, who cares that's couch cushion change. I think that's a terrible investment decision regardless of whether they had the money to make it.
Do the maths. Apple takes $120/year in revenue per Apple Music subscription. Let's assume they have margins of 10% (it's probably more, but whatever), so that $12/year per person.

So they'd only need 50,000 extra subscribers to more than cover their investment.

A quick check on Twitter, and Chance has 3.5 million followers, so it'd only take 1.5% of those fans to sign up for it to be a rock-solid investment.

Regardless of your taste in music, those cold, hard stats don't sound like dumb business choices to me. Quite the opposite.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
117 months ago
They took a Chance and it paid off.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Pentium Avatar
117 months ago
half a million?? I think I made a wrong decision when I went medicine lol :D
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)