Apple's Latest App Store Changes Satisfy EU, No More Fines Coming

by

The European Union is set to accept the June updates that Apple made to its App Store to comply with the Digital Markets Act, reports Reuters. As a result, Apple will not face daily fines for non-compliance.

App Store vs. EU
Apple changed its ‌App Store‌ fee setup and removed its anti-steering rules to meet the demands of the European Commission. Developers can now direct customers to purchase options outside the ‌App Store‌ and even accept payments for digital goods in their apps using third-party payment options.

At the European Commission's direction Apple has split its ‌App Store‌ services options to let developers opt out of certain features for a lower fee. There are now two tiers that developers can pay for. The cheaper one eliminates ratings and reviews, ‌App Store‌ featuring and marketing, search suggestions, automatic app updates, and automatic app downloads across devices. The more expensive tier includes all current ‌App Store‌ features and functionality.

Tier 1 store services cost five percent of an app's revenue, and Tier 2 store services cost 13 percent (10 percent for Small Business Program participants). Apple also charges a two percent initial acquisition fee and a five percent Core Technology Commission (CTC). The CTC replaces the CTF, a controversial fee that charged developers €0.50 per app install after one million installs per year.

Right now, there's a split CTC and CTF system for developers who use external links and those who don't, but by January 1, 2026, Apple will have a single business model that includes the services fee, the initial acquisition fee, and the CTC. At maximum, developers will pay 20 percent, and per-install billing won't exist. Developers who choose limited ‌App Store‌ functionality will pay a 12 percent maximum fee. Small Business Program participants will pay between 10 and 15 percent.

If Apple had not changed its ‌App Store‌ fee structure and linking rules, it could have been fined up to five percent of its average daily worldwide revenue (about €50 million) each day. The European Commission is expected to accept the ‌App Store‌ updates "in the coming weeks," but timing could change.

Apple was already fined €500 million for allegedly violating the Digital Markets Act, but the company has filed an appeal. Apple is protesting both the fine and the new anti-steering rules that the European Commission required.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Tags: App Store, European Commission, European Union

Popular Stories

iPhone Top Left Hole Punch Face ID Feature Purple

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Thursday January 15, 2026 10:56 am PST by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another eight months, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we have recapped 12 features rumored for the iPhone 18 Pro models, as of January 2026: The same overall design is expected, with 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch display sizes, and a "plateau" housing three rear cameras Under-screen Face ID...
Read Full Article • 73 comments
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

These 5 Apple Products Will Reportedly Be Upgraded With OLED Displays

Friday January 16, 2026 7:07 pm PST by
Apple plans to upgrade the iPad mini, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, iMac, and MacBook Air with OLED displays between 2026 and 2028, according to DigiTimes. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman previously reported that the iPad mini and MacBook Pro will receive an OLED display as early as this year, but he does not expect the MacBook Air to adopt the technology until 2028 at the earliest. A new iPad Air is...
Read Full Article • 77 comments
2024 iPhone Boxes Feature

Apple Adjusts Trade-In Values for iPhones, Macs, and More

Thursday January 15, 2026 11:19 am PST by
Apple today updated its trade-in values for select iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch models. Trade-ins can be completed on Apple's website, or at an Apple Store. The charts below provide an overview of Apple's current and previous trade-in values in the United States, according to the company's website. Most of the values declined slightly, but some of the Mac values increased. iPhone ...
Read Full Article • 54 comments
Apple Wallet ID Illinois

Apple Plans to Expand iPhone Driver's Licenses to These 7 U.S. States

Friday January 16, 2026 12:12 pm PST by
In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps. The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future. To set up the...
Read Full Article
iOS 27 Mock Quick

iOS 27 Will Add These 8 New Features to Your iPhone

Sunday January 18, 2026 3:51 pm PST by
iOS 27 is still many months away, but there are already plenty of rumors about new features that will be included in the software update. The first beta of iOS 27 will be released during WWDC 2026 in June, and the update should be released to all users with a compatible iPhone in September. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said that iOS 27 will be similar to Mac OS X Snow Leopard, in the sense...
Read Full Article • 76 comments

Top Rated Comments

MacUserFella Avatar
MacUserFella
26 weeks ago
FINE-ally, am I right?
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
klasma
26 weeks ago
From the Reuters article: "All options remain on the table. We are still assessing Apple's proposed changes," the EU watchdog said.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
addamas Avatar
addamas
26 weeks ago
So apps will be cheaper right? Right?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
con2apple Avatar
con2apple
26 weeks ago
I know we're on a site for rumors. But wouldn't it be better to wait for official confirmation?
It is rather unlikely that Apple will be allowed to continue charging fees for access to the iPhone. That would be contrary to free competition and would allow Apple to continue earning money out of thin air.

And once again to all Apple fans:
Just imagine if Microsoft and Google charged Apple a fee every time a user installed "iCloud for Windows" or "Music for Android" on their OS. It wouldn't come from an app store, but simply on principle.
When you think about what Apple wants money for right now, maybe your hatred of competition, fair markets, and the EU will cease.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BaldiMac Avatar
BaldiMac
26 weeks ago

I know we're on a site for rumors. But wouldn't it be better to wait for official confirmation?
It is rather unlikely that Apple will be allowed to continue charging fees for access to the iPhone. That would be contrary to free competition and would allow Apple to continue earning money out of thin air.

And once again to all Apple fans:
Just imagine if Microsoft and Google charged Apple a fee every time a user installed "iCloud for Windows" or "Music for Android" on their OS. It wouldn't come from an app store, but simply on principle.
When you think about what Apple wants money for right now, maybe your hatred of competition, fair markets, and the EU will cease.
Imagine? So, like, if Microsoft charged a developer for games sold through Target, that would be weird to you? Because they already do that.

Once again... It's perfectly normal for platform owners to charge businesses for access to their platform. Some platforms are open. Some platforms are closed. Some are free. Some charge. That you prefer an open platform is just a preference.


You're not defending your poor sick brother from an evil dictator, you're defending a profit-driven company from having to comply with "laws“.
Ignoring the ad hominem nonsense, you're being misleading here. No one is arguing that the Apple doesn't have to comply with the law. Only that it's a bad law. Personally, I agree with the DMA''s goal of more competition. I just think it is a poor way to go about it.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
surferfb
26 weeks ago

It would be nice if you could back up your claims.
At least once.
Here's an article from Politico ('https://www.politico.eu/article/apple-to-appeal-e500m--digital-fine-over-eus-silence-in-compliance-talks/'). Here's the key part:

According to correspondence seen by POLITICO, Apple offered last summer to drop its rules ('https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=szrqxadx') on how app developers can communicate with users, but was told by the Commission to hold off, pending feedback from developers.

By late September and following a round of consultations with Apple critics like Spotify, Match Group and Epic Games, executives at the U.S.-based firm began worrying that a lack of feedback from the Commission meant it was teeing up a potential fine and noncompliance decision.

Because what you're saying is clearly false. The EU doesn't constantly change the rules, nor does it act „in bad faith“.

Wake up, already.
You're not defending your poor sick brother from an evil dictator, you're defending a profit-driven company from having to comply with "laws“.
You call telling Apple "don't implement that yet" and then fining Apple for, in part, for not implementing what they told Apple to not implement "operating in good faith"? What part of "declare iPadOS is a gatekeeper despite the fact that iPadOS doesn't meet the quantitative metrics written into the law to be a gatekeeper" is not "changing the rules"?

I'm defending a company pushing back against wrong-headed laws that already have made, and will continue to make, everyone's products worse. Especially when those laws were written by regulators who don't understand what they're doing, have a history of screwing up regulations around tech, and have frozen innovation in their jurisdiction with their regulations.

It's not just Apple saying it either. Meta, had this to say ('https://about.fb.com/news/2025/07/why-the-commissions-decision-undermines-the-goals-of-the-dma/'):

[I]“Our constructive engagement – which pre-dated the launch of any investigation – was publicly noted by the Commission. Yet as 2024 progressed, the goalposts kept shifting and that has continued into 2025. We made proposals but feedback has often not been forthcoming. If feedback was received, it was often inconsistent and untethered from the DMA text. Meanwhile, despite the significant investment that we made to comply and address the Commission’s varying feedback, it kept repeating that it would never be in a position to bless DMA compliance proposals.[/I]
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments