Apple Challenges 'Unprecedented' €500M EU Fine Over App Store Steering Rules - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Challenges 'Unprecedented' €500M EU Fine Over App Store Steering Rules

Apple is appealing the 500 million euro ($570 million) fine that it is facing in the European Union for allegedly violating the Digital Markets Act.

App Store vs EU Feature 2
In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said that the fine is unprecedented, and goes beyond what the law requires.

Today we filed our appeal because we believe the European Commission's decision--and their unprecedented fine--go far beyond what the law requires. As our appeal will show, the EC is mandating how we run our store and forcing business terms which are confusing for developers and bad for users. We implemented this to avoid punitive daily fines and will share the facts with the Court.

Apple was fined in April for restricting app developers from informing users about purchase options available outside of the App Store. The European Commission said that developers should have the ability to direct customers to outside of the ‌App Store‌.

"App developers distributing their apps via Apple's ‌App Store‌ should be able to inform customers, free of charge, of alternative offers outside the ‌App Store‌, steer them to those offers and allow them to make purchases," said the EC in its ruling.

Besides fining Apple 500 million euros, the EC also ordered Apple to change its ‌App Store‌ rules around steering or face further fines. Apple made the required changes in late June to prevent being further penalized during the appeals process. Apps that are distributed through EU storefronts can now freely link to deals available outside of the ‌App Store‌, and can even provide alternate purchase options that don't use Apple's in-app purchase system.

Apple also updated its fee structure in the European Union, and by January 1, 2026, all EU developers will pay a Core Technology Commission, an initial acquisition fee, and a store services fee. Fees will vary based on the level of ‌App Store‌ service that developers opt to use, and Small Business Program participants will pay lower fees. The maximum fee under the new system for ‌App Store‌ app distribution with Apple's full suite of services is 20 percent, 10 percent lower than the prior 30 percent fee.

There is a tiered system for ‌App Store‌ services to lower fees. Developers that want to pay less can choose tier 1, and Apple will not provide automatic app updates, ratings, reviews, search suggestions, ‌App Store‌ features and marketing, and analytics. Tier 2 provides all of the current ‌App Store‌ services. Tier 1 is mandatory, and tier 2 is optional.

Apple says that the European Commission required it to offer different tiers that would let developers pay less for fewer services, which is why there is a new, more complex system. The EC also instructed Apple on which services developers should be able to opt out of, resulting in Apple moving search discovery and browse options out of its mandatory tier.

Apple plans to argue that the EC is telling it how to operate its business, and that the commission has expanded the definition of steering beyond what the law requires.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature Dock

Apple Quietly Tweaked the iOS App Store App – Here's What's Changed

Friday April 17, 2026 2:32 am PDT by
No, you aren't going crazy – Apple has quietly made a backend change to the App Store app in iOS that switches the location of the Updates tab and renames it to make it more prominent. In the App Store app, you can see the change by tapping your profile picture in the top-right corner. The "Apps & Purchase History" tab used to be at the top the list, but it has switched places with...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Pulled Cal AI for Deceptive Billing Design, Not External Payments

Tuesday April 21, 2026 12:54 pm PDT by
Apple recently cracked down on Cal AI, an app owned by MyFitnessPal that tried to skirt Apple's in-app purchase rules. Apple told TechCrunch that it briefly pulled the calorie-counting app last week for violating purchasing guidelines and using a deceptive billing design. When the app was pulled last week, there was speculation that it was removed for implementing web-based payments,...
app store monthly sub commitment

Apple Introduces App Store Monthly Subscriptions With 12-Month Commitment

Monday April 27, 2026 12:52 pm PDT by
Apple today announced the launch of a new subscription option for App Store developers: monthly subscriptions with a 12-month commitment. The new option allows developers to offer subscribers discounted pricing typically associated with an annual subscription but paid on a monthly basis to keep payments more affordable. This new payment option allows you to offer subscribers more affordable...

Top Rated Comments

opiapr Avatar
11 months ago

I’m done.

Just let me side load. I paid £1000 for this phone.
You chose to purchase it knowing exactly what you were getting. If you don’t like the walled garden, don’t buy into it.
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjsuk Avatar
11 months ago
I’m done.

Just let me side load. I paid £1000 for this phone.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago
People claiming the EU is ripping off Apple should be aware that this fine amounts to only about 1.4% of the maximum possible penalty (10% of global turnover) the EU could have imposed. If the intention were truly to "rip Apple off," the fine would be much higher.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago

We will continue to implement the forced changes in the most confusing way possible and may not bring new stuff to your market. This is bad for everyone but let’s see how this goes.
Funny, while trying to defend Apple you've still managed to concede their shockingly petulant nature (as can be seen in every bizarre public statement they've made about this), and how much value they really place on "doing what's right for consumers" as opposed to protecting their ~80% App Store margins or 90%+ Safari (Google search deal) margins.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
iPay Avatar
11 months ago
> Today we filed our appeal because we believe the European Commission's decision--and their unprecedented fine--go far beyond what the law requires.
Meaning: far beyond their expected fine if they don't comply.
They act as if they don't get how EU works (of course they do): fines are not bribes or extortion or random tariffs, it's a tool to have their regulations enforced. Saying "ok, I choose the fine" only leads to higher fines until they comply. Also, EU doesn't TACO. People may have strong opinions on regulations and hate EU for that, but it's how it works when you try to sell there.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AppliedMicro Avatar
11 months ago

You have no idea what you’re doing and just want to show that you stand up against "big tech", making everything worse (and confusing)
If anyone’s making anything confusing regarding distribution and installation of software, it’s Apple - not the EU.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)