watchOS 26 Moves Latest Apple Watch Models to New Architecture

watchOS 26 brings a significant upgrade to the Apple Watch's architecture, transitioning the latest models to full arm64.

watchos 26
The change was revealed in Apple's "What's new in watchOS 26" video for developers. The Apple Watch Series 9, Series 10, and Apple Watch Ultra 2 are set to move from arm64_32 to the full arm64 architecture.

The arm64_32 architecture was a modified version of the standard 64-bit ARM architecture with 32-bit pointers, specifically optimized for the constrained memory environments of wearable devices. This hybrid architecture allowed Apple to implement the benefits of 64-bit instruction sets while maintaining a tighter memory footprint than full 64-bit systems.

The standard arm64 architecture provides 64-bit pointers and access to broader memory ranges, enhanced performance, and increased compatibility with general-purpose ARM computing standards. The move also opens the door for potentially more complex and computationally intensive watchOS applications, since arm64 provides access to more registers and system resources compared to the more compact arm64_32, as well as more direct alignment with development tools and runtime environments used across other Apple platforms.

‌watchOS 26‌ apps must now be built with awareness of both arm64 and arm64_32, depending on the target device. Apple clarified that older models, such as the Apple Watch SE (2nd generation) and Series 8, continue to use the arm64_32 architecture. As a result, watchOS apps need to include separate binaries to support both instruction sets. Xcode automatically manages the build process for arm64 and arm64_32 as long as developers maintain appropriate deployment targets and architectures in their project settings.

Existing apps built for arm64_32 will continue to run on newer Apple Watches running ‌watchOS 26‌ via compatibility layers, but re-compilation for native arm64 is encouraged for best performance and forward compatibility. It is likely that arm64_32 support on the Apple Watch will gradually diminish over coming years as legacy hardware is retired. All of Apple's other platforms already use the full arm64 architecture.

Related Roundups: watchOS 11, watchOS 26
Related Forum: Apple Watch

Popular Stories

airpods translate

AirPods Live Translation Blocked for EU Users With EU Apple Accounts

Thursday September 11, 2025 4:01 am PDT by
Apple's new Live Translation feature for AirPods will be off-limits to millions of European users when it arrives next week, with strict EU regulations likely holding back its rollout. Apple says on its feature availability webpage that "Apple Intelligence: Live Translation with AirPods" won't be available if both the user is physically in the EU and their Apple Account region is in the EU....
iPhone 17 Pro Colors

iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro Models Are eSIM-Only in These Countries

Tuesday September 9, 2025 12:23 pm PDT by
Apple continues to phase out the physical SIM card tray on iPhones, with the latest models relying solely on eSIM technology in more countries. The new iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max support eSIMs only in these countries and regions, according to Apple: Bahrain Canada Guam Japan Kuwait Mexico Oman Qatar Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates Un...
iPhone 17 Pro Colors

Didn't Pre-Order a New iPhone Yet? Here's How Long the Wait is Now

Friday September 12, 2025 6:11 am PDT by
iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, and iPhone Air pre-orders began at 5 a.m. Pacific Time in the U.S. and many other countries today. If you have yet to place a pre-order, you might face a longer wait now, depending on your desired configuration. As of shortly after 6 a.m. Pacific Time today, nearly all iPhone 17 Pro Max configurations on Apple's online store in the U.S. are facing ...
iPhone 17 Pro Colors

iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro: Release Date and Pre-Orders

Wednesday September 10, 2025 12:30 am PDT by
Apple held its annual iPhone event on Tuesday, September 9, to unveil the iPhone 17, ultra-thin iPhone Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max. All of the new iPhone models will be available to pre-order starting Friday, September 12 at 5 a.m. Pacific Time / 8 a.m. Eastern Time in the U.S. and dozens of other countries, according to Apple. The release date for the devices is one week...
iPhone 17 Pro Cosmic Orange

Skipping the iPhone 17 Pro? Here's What's Rumored for iPhone 18 Pro

Wednesday September 10, 2025 8:33 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are still a year away, there are already a few rumors about the devices that offer an early look ahead. If you are skipping the iPhone 17 Pro and want to know about what to expect from the iPhone 18 Pro models, we have recapped a few of the key rumors below. Under-Screen Face ID In April 2023, display industry analyst Ross Young shared a...
apple n1 chip

Apple's New N1 Chip in iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone Air Has a Wi-Fi 7 Limitation

Saturday September 13, 2025 10:01 am PDT by
The latest iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, and iPhone Air models are equipped with Apple's all-new N1 chip for Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, and Thread connectivity. However, the chip has a Wi-Fi 7 bandwidth limitation. According to FCC documents reviewed by MacRumors, the N1 chip in all of the new iPhone models supports up to 160 MHz channel bandwidth for Wi-Fi 7, short of the...
iPhone 17 Pro Colors

Apple Announces iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max With New Design, Larger Battery, and More

Tuesday September 9, 2025 10:59 am PDT by
Apple today introduced the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. Both devices feature a new aluminum unibody design, with the Ceramic Shield now protecting both the front and back sides. Apple says the front side is now Ceramic Shield 2, which offers 3x better scratch resistance, while the rear Ceramic Shield is advertised as 4x more resistant to cracks compared to the back glass on previous...
iphone 17 pro dark blue

The Camera Plateau: What's New With the iPhone 17 Pro Cameras

Wednesday September 10, 2025 3:53 pm PDT by
With the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max, Apple introduced a new design for the rear of the device. Instead of a camera bump, we now have a camera plateau that spans almost the entire back of the iPhone. The camera plateau houses an upgraded camera system that includes a revamped Telephoto lens. All three of the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max cameras are 48 megapixels, and there are five zoom...

Top Rated Comments

hg.wells Avatar
13 weeks ago

Every sentence in English should begin with a capital letter. This is a fundamental rule of English grammar.
Not if it’s a company name, product name or trademark. Apple has chosen to keep it lowercase in all of their articles and marketing so it makes sense that MacRumors chose to follow that brand style.
Score: 30 Votes (Like | Disagree)
goonie4life9 Avatar
13 weeks ago
Wooo, this is truly a game changer for Apple Watch. With the move to arm64, the modern Apple Watches are truly the watches for ultra pros. This will allow developers to take watchOS apps to a whole new level, while maintaining the best-in-class privacy only Apple is known for. Apple can’t wait to see the incredible things customers do with the biggest leap forward in Apple Watch since the original Apple Watch.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
coachgq Avatar
13 weeks ago
That’s a lot of “Greek” in this article for my brain capacity. All I want to know is will safari be snappier on my watch from now on?
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
QuarterSwede Avatar
13 weeks ago

Every sentence in English should begin with a capital letter. This is a fundamental rule of English grammar.
Depending on what style guide they’re using and the audience, an exception can be made for a product name that isn’t capitalized like “watchOS.” For this audience, it makes sense.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrCubes Avatar
13 weeks ago

Apple has really pushed the bounds of 64 bit computing for sure... but I absolutely do not see any benefit to going all in on 64 bit pointers on apple watch. The latest models have ~1 GB of RAM. They could quadruple that amount and still be fine with 32 bit pointers. I'd be interested to see what they are doing under the hood that truly makes going to 64 bit pointers all that great at this memory footprint that justifies this change - otherwise this feels like a slick way of combinging a 64 bit marketing win with forced obsolesce.

"Look!!! 64 bit stuff... oh by the way, the pointers take double the memory, so older devices will run even slower... time to upgrade!"
It's not just about addressable memory. While you are correct that pointers will generally take double the memory when moving from 32 to 64 bit, storage of pointers is usually a tiny fraction of an applications memory footprint. It *may* impact how much you can fit in a cacheline if you have containers with a lot of pointers (assuming the cacheline does not double with this move, too - I'm only going by the article and it doesn't mention it). So, overall, a fairly negligible downside. Note that there should not be a difference in speed of access of a 32 bit pointer vs a 64 bit pointer (although alternate pointers in a consecutive range may see a difference, depending on how that mapping is implemented).

The upside is, at the very least: more registers (if the article is correct) - which is often even more important than the capacity of the cacheline! There is some handwaving in the article about things like "more system resources" ??‍♂️ Could mean memory (but we don't seem to be close to the limit there, as you say), so there may be other benefits.

But based on access to more registers alone I'd say this is likely to be a net performance advantage for most (if not all) apps.

Of course none of this is straightforward and the reality may look quite different to my speculation, above.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
iBluetooth Avatar
13 weeks ago

Apple has really pushed the bounds of 64 bit computing for sure... but I absolutely do not see any benefit to going all in on 64 bit pointers on apple watch. The latest models have ~1 GB of RAM. They could quadruple that amount and still be fine with 32 bit pointers. I'd be interested to see what they are doing under the hood that truly makes going to 64 bit pointers all that great at this memory footprint that justifies this change - otherwise this feels like a slick way of combinging a 64 bit marketing win with forced obsolesce.

"Look!!! 64 bit stuff... oh by the way, the pointers take double the memory, so older devices will run even slower... time to upgrade!"
The phones also started out on 32 bit ARM processors. What they gain by going to fully 64 bit is more registers and better optimized ISA. The code will get larger with larger pointers, so they probably waited with this step until they felt the gains overshadowed the disadvantages. It's more than just the addressable memory, it's about efficiency as well as when they transformed the phones to 64 bit.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)