Here's How Much It Costs Apple to Make a Vision Pro Headset

Starting at $3,500, Apple's Vision Pro price puts it at the top-end of the AR/VR headset market, but a significant portion of the cost is down to the device's premium "bill of materials," which is thought to come in at just over $1,500.

Making Vision Pro
According to Omdia's research, the components used in Vision Pro are estimated to cost Apple a total of $1,542. The most expensive component is said to be the two 1.25-inch micro-OLED displays inside the headset, one for each eye. The displays provide a total of 23 million pixels, which Apple says is "more pixels than a 4K TV." Omdia estimates that Apple pays $228 for each display, or $456 per headset.

The second most expensive components are the M2 and R1 chips. The M2 is the main processor, which is the same chip that was first introduced in the 2022 MacBook Air. The M2 is responsible for processing content, running the visionOS operating system, executing computer vision algorithms, and providing graphical content. The R1 chip is responsible for all of the information coming from the cameras, sensors, and microphones. Together they cost Apple a total of $240.

As noted by CNBC, it is hard to extrapolate Apple's profit margin from these estimated figures, since they do not take into account research and development costs, packaging, shipping, sales, marketing, and any capital expenditures that can add up-front costs to large parts orders. Nevertheless, they do give an idea of how expensive the parts alone are in a given device.

Apple is expected to produce fewer than 400,000 Vision Pro headsets in 2024 due to the complexity of manufacturing, according to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. However, Apple is said to be already working on a new version of the Apple Vision Pro that will be priced more affordably. The chips in the device are likely to be on par with the iPhone rather than Mac-level chips, and Apple may also use lower resolution internal displays and cheaper materials. It could also drop the outward-facing EyeSight feature that lets other people see a simulated rendering of the wearer's eyes.

Bloomberg's Mark Gurman believes that Apple is working on a next-generation version of the Vision Pro that could see a launch sometime in late 2025.

Related Roundup: Apple Vision Pro
Buyer's Guide: Vision Pro (Buy Now)
Related Forum: Apple Vision Pro

Popular Stories

iOS 19 visionOS UI Elements

iOS 19 to Have Some of the 'Biggest' Design Changes in iPhone's History

Sunday March 16, 2025 10:35 am PDT by
Apple is planning some of the "biggest iOS and macOS redesigns in its history," according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman reiterated that iOS 19 will have a visionOS-like design with more transparent interfaces:The new interfaces will adopt the design principles introduced in visionOS, the software for Apple's Vision Pro headset. That includes greater...
iphone 17 pro asherdipps

iPhone 17 Pro Max Rumors Allegedly Refer to 'iPhone 17 Ultra' Model

Friday March 14, 2025 7:56 am PDT by
If you've been following iPhone rumors over the last few years, you may remember reading reports that Apple flirted with the idea of introducing a super high-end "Ultra" model that would either replace its Pro Max device or sit above it in Apple's smartphone hirearchy. These reports appeared in the pre-launch iPhone 15 and iPhone 16 rumor cycles, but ultimately came to nothing. Now though, the...
Bent iPhone Air Feature

Apple Canned Larger iPhone 17 Air Model Over Fears of Bendgate 2.0

Monday March 17, 2025 4:07 am PDT by
Apple prototyped a larger ultra-slim iPhone 17 Air with a 6.9-inch display, but ultimately decided not to go ahead with the device because of fears that it could be susceptible to bending, according to a new report. Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman, writing in his latest Power On newsletter: When it first started work on the phone, it prototyped a device with a 6.9-inch screen — matching...
iphone 16 pro models 1

Apple's First Foldable iPhone Estimated to Cost Nearly Twice as Much as iPhone 16 Pro Max

Monday March 17, 2025 6:42 am PDT by
In an investor research note today with British bank Barclays, analyst Tim Long said Apple's first foldable iPhone could have a starting price in the $2,300 range in the United States, which would make it by far the most expensive iPhone model ever. If the first foldable iPhone starts at $2,299, that means it would cost nearly twice as much as the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which starts at $1,199. ...
iphone 16 pro ghost hand

Next Year's iPhone 18 Pro Already Rumored to Have Five New Features

Tuesday March 18, 2025 1:00 pm PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro models are still around a year and a half away from launching, there are already some early rumors about the devices. Below, we recap some key iPhone 18 Pro rumors so far. Under-Screen Face ID In April 2023, display industry analyst Ross Young shared a roadmap showing that iPhone 17 Pro models would feature under-display Face ID. In May 2024, however, Young said ...
General iOS Mail Feature

iOS 18.3.2 Broke iCloud Mail Delivery

Monday March 17, 2025 3:31 pm PDT by
The iOS 18.3.2 update that Apple released last week appears to have broken iCloud Mail for some users. There are multiple complaints on Reddit and the MacRumors forums from users who say that iCloud Mail is not able to push new iCloud emails to their iPhones after the iOS 18.3.2 update. Affected users say that despite having the correct settings enabled, new iCloud emails are not showing up...
iphone 16 pro models 1

All Four iPhone 17 Models Rumored to Feature Upgraded 24-Megapixel Front Camera and More

Monday March 17, 2025 7:50 pm PDT by
All four iPhone 17 models launching later this year will feature an upgraded 24-megapixel front-facing camera, according to analyst Jeff Pu. In a research note today with investment firm GF Securities, Pu shared a chart in which he reiterated that the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max will each be equipped with a 24-megapixel front camera. By comparison, all four ...
iPhone 17 Air Size Feature

'iPhone 17 Air' Rumored to Start at $899 With Surprisingly Good Battery Life, Camera Control, and More

Sunday March 16, 2025 9:05 am PDT by
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman today shared some new details about the rumored iPhone 17 Air. In his Power On newsletter, Gurman said he was told that the device may start at roughly $899 in the U.S., which means that it would occupy the same price point as the iPhone 16 Plus. This would make sense, as it has been widely rumored that the Air model will take over the Plus model's spot in the iPhone...

Top Rated Comments

NinjaHERO Avatar
14 months ago
I just want a nice set of HUD glasses that bluetooth to my phone. Let my phone be the “computer”. Much simpler and lighter.

Attachment Image
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
G5isAlive Avatar
14 months ago

$2,000 profit per headset? :eek: They could've sold it for $2,000 - $2,500. Can't blame them though...they know people are daft enough to pay $3,500 so why not?

I'm looking forward to the $4,500 headset... why do you think they called it the Vision Pro? There will be a Vision Pro Max/Ultra.

I think it's safe to say the line up will look something like:

Vision SE - $1,500 - $500-750 profit
Vision (standard) - $2,000 - $750-1,000 profit
Vision Plus - $2,500 - $1,500 profit
Vision Pro - $3,500 - $2,000 profit
Vision Ultra - $4,500 - $2,500 profit
3500-1500= 2000 profit?

Buzzzzz wrong answer. That’s the raw materials cost. Maybe. But let’s assume it’s accurate it does not include cost of setting up a new assembly line or labor costs or distribution costs, and all that is after the R&D costs which are not free. That all adds up to considerable costs.

Or do you go into restaurants and complain about the price of a steak because you can buy a pound of beef for cheaper at your grocery store?

You’ve been around enough to know better.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Blackstick Avatar
14 months ago
That doesn’t include the considerable R&D. They have patents for this product going back 15 or more years.

There was some diagrams where a headset was connected to an iPod of the era. Imagine coming to Apple in 2005 and this shipping in 2024. More than half your professional career spent on a product that took almost 20 years to ship. Wild.

With Vision Pro it’s not so much about today, it’s about where it could be in 5 years, 10 years? Price will come down, but I don’t foresee this product line ever being a $299 iPad or $899 MacBook Air. A $499 Quest competing with the PlayStation during Black Friday, Apple isn’t going for.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
phewlo Avatar
14 months ago

$2,000 profit per headset? :eek: They could've sold it for $2,000 - $2,500. Can't blame them though...they know people are daft enough to pay $3,500 so why not?

I'm looking forward to the $4,500 headset... why do you think they called it the Vision Pro? There will be a Vision Pro Max/Ultra.

I think it's safe to say the line up will look something like:

Vision SE - $1,500 - $500-750 profit
Vision (standard) - $2,000 - $750-1,000 profit
Vision Plus - $2,500 - $1,500 profit
Vision Pro - $3,500 - $2,000 profit
Vision Ultra - $4,500 - $2,500 profit
Where in the article did it say they were making a $2,000 profit per headset sold? ?
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
leman Avatar
14 months ago

Typical Apple margin
With insane, R&D, huge production line setup costs, and low volume, I’d be surprised if Apple makes a lot of money of the first Vision Pro. To them, it’s an investment in the future, not a quick cash grab.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Blackstick Avatar
14 months ago

No need to state the obvious, especially when it literally says it right there in the article...you read it, right?

As noted by CNBC ('https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/24/apples-vision-pro-why-its-so-expensive.html'), it is hard to extrapolate Apple's profit margin from these estimated figures, since they do not take into account research and development costs
Not sure if you’re new here but this is MacRumors. By mid morning, you’ll have plenty of comments arguing both sides, “it’s factored in”, “no it’s not!”

The obvious should always be stated.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)