Skip to Content

Apple Developers Required to Justify Use of Some APIs in Latest Move to Boost Privacy

In an effort to bolster user privacy, developers will need to justify their use of certain Apple APIs before their apps can be listed on the App Store, according to a new article on the Apple developer website spotted by 9to5Mac.

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated
The Apple Developer website now lists some APIs as "Required Reason APIs," meaning that developers have to clarify why they are using them in their privacy manifest. Some commonly used APIs, such as UserDefaults, which stores user preferences, now fall under the Required Reason category.

With the launch of watchOS 10, iOS 17, iPadOS 17, tvOS 17, and macOS Sonoma later this year, developers will receive a warning if they submit apps using a Required Reason API without specifying its usage. From spring 2024, any apps using these APIs without a legitimate justification will be rejected in the review process.

Apple explains that main reason for this change is to curb fingerprinting, a method used to track users across different apps and websites. Fingerprinting uses API calls to gather details about a user's device, such as screen resolution, model, and operating system. This data is then used to create a unique "fingerprint," enabling the user to be identified across various apps or websites.

According to Apple, Required Reason APIs will guarantee that apps only employ these APIs for their prescribed use. In the event of a rejection, Apple will permit developers to contest the decision and submit a request for approval if their case does not fit within the existing guidelines. See the Apple Developer website for more information.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...

Top Rated Comments

fatTribble Avatar
34 months ago
I applaud efforts like these from Apple. Anything to enhance privacy for end users is a win in my book. 🤓🥰👏
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
34 months ago

As a developer I can't tell you how much of a pain this is going to be.
As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
34 months ago

As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
I like your attitude towards it, instead of “oh it’s going to be a pain” which gives me little faith in a developer to protect my privacy because it’s too inconvenient for them
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Zc456 Avatar
34 months ago
I can already hear Zuck yelling in frustration from within Facebook HQ.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
fatTribble Avatar
34 months ago

Good for privacy reason, however how much apps will slip through QC and checks? Many stories how fraudulent apps slipped through. The Apple App Store was once the example of quality apps compared to it's Android counterpart. Now it just feels like Android Junk.
Any gaps in QC can be improved over time. Because they potentially don’t catch everything doesn’t mean they should just give up.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
34 months ago
As a developer I can't tell you how much of a pain this is going to be. As a consumer, it's not going to stop me from downloading an app but I guess good to know.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)