'Reader' Apps Can Now Add Links for Account Signups Outside of the App Store

Apple today informed developers of "reader" apps that they are able to sign up for access to an "External Link Account Entitlement" that will allow the app to offer a link to a website so users can create or manage an account outside of the App Store.

app store blue banner
Reader apps are able to link to a website that is owned or maintained by the developer for account signups. So, for example, an app like Netflix can provide an in-app link that goes directly to the Netflix website for account signups, something that was not allowed before the change. Apple updated its App Store guidelines to reflect the change.

Apps may allow a user to access previously purchased content or content subscriptions (specifically: magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, and video). Reader apps may offer account creation for free tiers, and account management functionality for existing customers. Reader app developers may apply for the External Link Account Entitlement to provide an informational link in their app to a web site the developer owns or maintains responsibility for in order to create or manage an account. Learn more about the External Link Account Entitlement.

Apple considers reader apps to be those that provide digital content that includes magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, or video as the primary functionality of the app. Apple made this change to reader apps in order to settle an investigation launched by the Japanese Fair Trade Commission.

According to Apple, reader apps do not offer in-app digital goods and services for purchase and are primarily aimed at allowing users to browse previously purchased content or content subscriptions, which is why Apple agreed to allow apps share a single link for account management purposes.

Apps that use the External Link Account Entitlement must provide reader content, must not offer in-app purchases, and must not offer real-time, person-to-person services. Apps that allow people to access digital content like music or video, but not as the primary functionality, such a social networking apps, are not considered reader apps.

When announcing the change in September, Apple said that it would update its ‌App Store‌ guidelines and review process to "make sure users of reader apps continue to have a safe experience on the ‌‌App Store‌‌." Apple plans to help developers of reader apps "protect users when they link to an external website to make purchases."

The reader app change will affect many of Apple's biggest competitors, including Spotify, Netflix, Hulu, and more, with the change applicable to all reader apps globally.

Popular Stories

iOS 26 on Three iPhones

iOS 26's Liquid Glass Design Draws Criticism From Users

Wednesday September 17, 2025 2:56 pm PDT by
It's been two days since iOS 26 was released, and Apple's new Liquid Glass design is even more divisive than expected. Any major design change can create controversy as people get used to the new look, but the MacRumors forums, Reddit, Apple Support Communities, and social media sites seem to feature more criticism than praise as people discuss the update. Complaints There are a long...
iPhone 17 Pro and Air Feature

Two iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air Colors Appear to Scratch More Easily

Friday September 19, 2025 10:02 am PDT by
As reported by Bloomberg today, some of the new iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone Air models on display at Apple Stores today are already scratched and scuffed. French blog Consomac also reported on this topic. The scratches appear to be most prominent on models with darker finishes, including the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max in Deep Blue, and the iPhone Air in Space Black. Images Credit: Consoma ...
iOS 26

iOS 26.0.1 Coming Soon, Likely With iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro Fix

Thursday September 18, 2025 9:17 am PDT by
Apple is preparing to release iOS 26.0.1, according to a private account on X with a proven track record of sharing information about future iOS versions. The update will have a build number of 23A350, or similar, the account said. It is likely that iOS 26.0.1 will fix a camera-related bug on the new iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro models. In his iPhone Air review, CNN Underscored's Henry T. ...
M6 MacBook Pro Feature 1

Apple's Rumored MacBook Pro Redesign: 6 New Features Anticipated

Wednesday September 17, 2025 4:26 am PDT by
Apple in October 2024 overhauled its 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro models, adding M4, M4 Pro, and M4 Max chips, Thunderbolt 5 ports on higher-end models, display changes, and more. That's quite a lot of updates in one go, but if you think this means a further major refresh for the ‌MacBook Pro‌ is now several years away, think again. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has said he expects only a small ...
iOS 26

iOS 26.1 to iOS 26.4: Here Are 5 New Features to Expect on Your iPhone

Tuesday September 16, 2025 11:17 am PDT by
iOS 26 was finally released on Monday, but the software train never stops, and the first developer beta of iOS 26.1 will likely be released soon. iOS 18.1 was an anomaly, as the first developer beta of that version was released in late July last year, to allow for early testing of Apple Intelligence features. The first betas of iOS 15.1, iOS 16.1, and iOS 17.1 were all released in the second ...
Tim Cook Rainbow

Apple Reportedly Plans to Launch These 10 Products in 'Coming Months'

Sunday September 14, 2025 8:45 am PDT by
Apple's annual September event is now in the rearview mirror, with the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone Air, Apple Watch Series 11, Apple Watch Ultra 3, Apple Watch SE 3, and AirPods Pro 3 set to launch this Friday, September 19. As always, there is more to come. In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said Apple plans to release many products in the...

Top Rated Comments

Apple Knowledge Navigator Avatar
46 months ago
Makes me laugh how Apple portrays such moves as a gesture of goodwill, when it takes the risk of fines and government intervention to actually force the move ?‍♂️
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
thejadedmonkey Avatar
46 months ago

Why should apple provide hosting of the apps as well as update delivery for free? If that's your stance, get ready for hosting fees and metered delivery.
Because storage and bandwidth are dirt cheap, and Apple already sells their app distribution service to developers for $99/year, which is more than enough to cover costs for 99% of apps.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jameslmoser Avatar
46 months ago

Why should apple provide hosting of the apps as well as update delivery for free? If that's your stance, get ready for hosting fees and metered delivery.
How about they should provide it for free because they force you to use them to do it? If Apple doesn't want to provide the service "for free" but still wants App Developers to support their platform, they could always just let them host their own apps and let their users install it from other places.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
neuropsychguy Avatar
46 months ago
This is a positive step. Apple can still get a commission for apps that must have iOS to function (e.g., a game) but allow other companies that just stream to benefit from iOS without having to pay Apple's commission. Maybe Apple will compensate by increasing the developer fees for these developers (I know, don't give Apple any ideas).
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jlc1978 Avatar
46 months ago

This is a positive step. Apple can still get a commission for apps that must have iOS to function (e.g., a game) but allow other companies that just stream to benefit from iOS without having to pay Apple's commission. Maybe Apple will compensate by increasing the developer fees for these developers (I know, don't give Apple any ideas).
I could see them charge host and or d/l fees for such apps at some point.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Abazigal Avatar
45 months ago


You can clearly see the problem. Apple is allowed to charge 30% for its InApp payment service, no problem. But at the same time Apple closes the gates to its platform for a competing e.g. PayPal InApp payment service that would only charge 3%. But this is an anti competitive behaviour and calls the EU for regulation.
I don’t see the issue, as payment services like PayPal can afford to charge only 3% precisely because they don’t have to deal with the costs of running and maintaining an App Store.

I am not against allowing other payment options in the App Store, but I do feel that Apple should still be entitled to a cut or the revenue nonetheless (like what they are proposing with the Netherlands dating app lawsuit).

But of course this will introduce its own moral hazard, as Apple has no way of tracking sales taking place outside of the App Store. Which in turn will entail auditing their books, which is more work both all parties entailed.

It doesn’t take a genius to see how iTunes remains the most streamlined and convenient payment option for all parties involved.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)