Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Says Apple's Privacy Changes are Self-Serving and Anti-Competitive

Facebook today shared its earnings for the fourth quarter of 2020, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's opening remarks were focused on Apple's upcoming anti-tracking privacy changes that will impact the advertising industry and companies like Facebook that rely heavily on online advertising.

Apple vs Facebook feature
As highlighted by The Washington Post, Zuckerberg claimed that Apple is changing its privacy policy not to help people, but to further its own interests.

"Apple has every incentive to use their dominant platform position to interfere with how our apps and other apps work, which they regularly do," said Zuckerberg. "They say they are doing this to help people, but the moves clearly track their competitive interests."

Zuckerberg said that Facebook sees Apple as one of its biggest competitors, claiming that the privacy changes will help Apple services like iMessage and FaceTime that compete with Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp.

"iMessage is a key linchpin of their ecosystem," said Zuckerberg. "It comes pre-installed on every iPhone and they preference it with private APIs and permissions, which is why iMessage is the most used messaging service in the U.S."

Zuckerberg also once again said that Apple's changes are going to impact small businesses, which is a claim that Facebook has been leaning on as it campaigns against Apple's planned changes. Facebook has previously published newspaper ads and shared blog posts explaining how Apple's iOS 14 ad-tracking changes will have a "harmful impact on many small businesses that are struggling to stay afloat."

Facebook has previously claimed that Apple's move is "about profit," and that it will leave apps and websites with no choice but to charge subscription fees or add in-app purchases to make ends meet, leading to increased App Store revenue.

Apple is not backing down despite Facebook's complaints and has plans to implement the new tracking rules in the near future. When made a requirement, apps that track usage through a random advertising identifier will need to ask users if they want to share their information for ad tracking purposes.

Advertisers use the random advertising identifier to serve up personalized ads and to track ad campaigns, but the ad industry expects that many people will opt not to share this information.

Apple says that users should be aware of when their data is being collected and shared across other apps and websites, and should have the choice to opt in or opt out. "We believe that this is a matter of standing up for our users," Apple has said in response to Facebook's claims.

Top Rated Comments

gnomeisland Avatar
31 months ago
And Facebook's monetizing of my privacy *isn't* about profit?!
Score: 121 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Runs For Fun Avatar
31 months ago
Oh boo hoo Zucc. Here’s the world’s smallest violin ?
Score: 86 Votes (Like | Disagree)
thedarkhalf Avatar
31 months ago
Yea ok, Zuck. Shut the **** up and go back to your home planet.
Score: 77 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Apple_Robert Avatar
31 months ago
Mark is the king of self-serving (and a lying hypocrite). All he is doing is trying to divert attention away from him, by smearing Apple.
Score: 71 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DNichter Avatar
31 months ago
Apple may take advantage of privacy being a key foundation of their platforms, but that was a decision they made years ago and have stuck with it. Sounds like a good business move to me more than anything else. Zuck can cry all he wants, but he made the choice to pry on Facebook users personal data for profit. Now he has to live with the repercussions of being one of the most damaging services in the world.
Score: 68 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ghostface147 Avatar
31 months ago
Too bad so sad. Sucks to suck. Get over it.
Score: 56 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

gradiente iphone white

Brazilian Electronics Company Revives Long-Running iPhone Trademark Dispute

Tuesday May 19, 2020 1:06 pm PDT by
Apple has been involved in a long-running iPhone trademark dispute in Brazil, which was revived today by IGB Electronica, a Brazilian consumer electronics company that originally registered the "iPhone" name in 2000. IGB Electronica fought a multi-year battle with Apple in an attempt to get exclusive rights to the "iPhone" trademark, but ultimately lost, and now the case has been brought to...