Tim Cook's Appearance at Upcoming Antitrust Hearing Highlights Apple's Political Balancing Act

Apple CEO Tim Cook is set to join Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Alphabet/Google CEO Sundar Pichai, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in an antitrust hearing held by the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee next Monday, but a new report by The Information takes a look at Cook's reluctance to participate in the hearing and how he and Apple have tried to navigate a polarized political environment.

WWDC 2020 Tim Cook
Some two weeks after the other tech CEOs had agreed to participate in the hearing, Cook was still holding out for fear of getting caught up in issues more relevant to those other companies than Apple.

There was a simple reason for his holdout. According to people familiar with his thinking, Cook was firm in his belief that Apple didn't belong with a group of companies increasingly viewed as antitrust malefactors by lawmakers and regulators, including Amazon, Facebook and Google. What’s more, Cook had spent much of the last four years mostly avoiding the kind of toxic political environment that has engulfed the CEOs of those companies over everything from privacy to censorship to treatment of workers.

But under the pressure of a potential subpoena from Representative David Cicilline, chairman of the committee and a critic of Apple's App Store policies, Cook ultimately agreed to participate in the hearing.

The report indicates that Cook has spent the better part of a month preparing for the hearing, which may touch on a wide range of subjects from App Store policies to Apple's disputes with the FBI over providing methods for law enforcement to access locked devices to Apple's relationships with China.

The full paywalled report goes into much more detail about how Cook has delicately balanced relationships on both ends of the political spectrum, trying to stay above the fray largely by keeping quiet. That approach has helped Apple maintain stability in turbulent times, winning exemptions from tariffs on many of its products and avoiding much of the scrutiny that has been aimed at other tech companies.

Still, Apple and Cook aren't completely immune to criticism, and it remains to be seen whether next week's hearing will lead to any action on antitrust and other fronts.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Top Rated Comments

magicschoolbus Avatar
24 months ago
we need another trustbuster.. Theodore Roosevelt would have so much fun in this day and age
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Expos of 1969 Avatar
24 months ago
This has the potential to be very interesting. No predictions from me at this point. Let's see how it plays out.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Carnegie Avatar
24 months ago

Honest question because I am curious now: what is the difference?
Horizontal refers to agreements or mergers between competitors. Vertical refers to agreements or mergers between buyers and sellers. If Nike and Converse agreed to fix prices, that would be a horizontal agreement. If Walmart agreed with one of its suppliers to fix prices, that would be a vertical agreement.

This is a concept that really matters when it comes to violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act or Section 7 of the Clayton Act. With Apple's App Store situation, it's more likely that it will have a problem with Section 2 of the Sherman Act - so this isn't a concept that's as relevant to this discussion.

Section 2 of the Sherman Act deals with monopolization. It's a violation to (1) have monopoly power and (2) engage in exclusionary conduct which is causally connected with that monopoly power.

Section 1 of the Sherman Act relates to agreements with other parties in restraint of trade. It might be illegal for Ford and GM to agree to do certain things. That would be a horizontal agreement. But it might also be illegal for Ford and car dealers to agree to do certain things. That would be a vertical agreement. Both can be antitrust violations, though the different kinds of agreements are analyzed differently. Some kinds of agreements are per se illegal, some are analyzed using the rule of reason.

Section 7 of the Clayton Act relates to anticompetitive mergers. Such mergers can be horizontal or vertical.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Rogifan Avatar
24 months ago
I heard Twitter was invited. Not sure what that company has to do with anti-trust. My guess is some members will try and steer this meeting into being about tech bias and censorship.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AtomicDusk Avatar
24 months ago
I'm curious to watch this, I hope that Representative Cicilline examines all Digital marketplaces selling digital goods as opposed to being critical of the App Store simply because it's Apple. I believe it would be shortsighted to assess the App Store without examining the entirety of the landscape of digital marketplaces.

My personal opinion is that Apple's App Store does have a high cost of doing business, and those costs will be either be eaten by the developer or passed on to the consumer. I as a consumer have two choices, 1. use the Apple ecosystem which tacitly tells apple that I am okay with these practices or 2. switch to another platform in protest.

I have to weigh if there is value in the possible extra costs brought on by the App Store cut. But that decision is a personal choice, a choice for which I have an alternative. It is my assessment that since I have a choice to enter and leave this ecosystem at will, that it should not be subject to monopoly inquiry; however, I'm not a legal scholar, I've not studied the law, and for all I know the App Store practices may well still fall under anti-trust regulation.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kabeyun Avatar
24 months ago

Still, Apple and Cook aren't completely immune to criticism
LMAO! Just stop by MacRumors, kids! A former fan site taken over by Apple trolls and hate baiters!! An Apple-enthusiast site where Apple enthusiasts dare not suggest it or they’re called names! Want criticism? Head on over!
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 14 Pro Purple Front and Back MacRumors Exclusive

iPhone 14 Pro Renders Highlight Multiple Design Changes

Wednesday May 25, 2022 8:56 am PDT by
Leaker Jon Prosser today shared ostensibly accurate renders of the iPhone 14 Pro, providing the most accurate look yet at what the device could look like when it launches later this year. In the latest video on YouTube channel Front Page Tech, Prosser revealed renders of the iPhone 14 Pro made by Apple concept graphic designer Ian Zelbo, highlighting a range of specific design changes...
iPad Pro USB C Feature Coral

Deals: Apple's iPad Pro Reaches Up to $449 Off in Amazon's Latest Sales

Wednesday May 25, 2022 10:09 am PDT by
Amazon is marking down a wide variety of 11-inch and 12.9-inch iPad Pro models this week, with prices starting as low as $749.00 for the 11-inch tablet. You'll find the full list of sales below, all of which can be found on Amazon. Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with some of these vendors. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep...
apple account card

Wallet App Now Supports Apple Account Cards on iOS 15.5

Wednesday May 25, 2022 5:01 pm PDT by
Apple appears to have recently updated the Wallet app to allow users to add an Apple Account Card, which displays the Apple credit balance associated with an Apple ID. If you receive an App Store or Apple Store gift card, for example, it is added to an Apple Account that was previously visible in the App Store and Apple Store apps. As of today, the Apple Account balance can also be added to...
iphone 13 pro max display bleen

iPhone 14 Max Reportedly Weeks Behind Schedule [Updated]

Thursday May 26, 2022 7:25 am PDT by
The iPhone 14 Max is currently behind schedule by around three weeks, according to Haitong International Securities analyst Jeff Pu. Yesterday, Nikkei Asia reported that at least one iPhone 14 model was three weeks behind schedule due to the impact of lockdowns on Apple's supply chains in China, but it was not clear which iPhone 14 model this related to. Now, Pu has clarified that the model...
iPhone 13 Always On Feature

iPhone 14 Pro Screen Refresh Rate Upgrade Could Allow for Always-On Display

Tuesday May 24, 2022 7:23 am PDT by
Last year's iPhone 13 Pro models were the first of Apple's smartphones to come with 120Hz ProMotion displays, and while the two iPhone 14 Pro models will continue to feature the technology, their screens could well boast expanded refresh rate variability this time round. To bring ProMotion displays to the ‌iPhone 13 Pro models‌, Apple adopted LTPO panel technology with variable refresh...
Apple Tap to Pay iPhone

Apple Stores Rolling Out iPhone-to-iPhone Contactless Payments Starting Today

Wednesday May 25, 2022 6:54 am PDT by
Apple in February unveiled a new "Tap to Pay on iPhone" feature that will allow compatible iPhones to accept payments via Apple Pay, contactless credit and debit cards, and other digital wallets, with no additional hardware required. Apple began testing the feature at its Apple Park Visitor Center earlier this month, and now Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has tweeted that the feature will begin...
apple tv 4k design green

Apple Releases tvOS 15.5.1 for Apple TV HD and Apple TV 4K

Wednesday May 25, 2022 9:42 am PDT by
Apple today released tvOS 15.5.1, a minor update to the tvOS operating system that first launched in September 2021. tvOS 15.5.1 comes about 10 days after the launch of tvOS 15.5. tvOS 15.5.1 can be downloaded over the air on the Apple TV through the Settings app by going to System > Software Update. ‌‌‌‌‌‌Apple TV‌‌‌‌‌‌ owners who have automatic software updates...