New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Hands-On With LG's Massive 5K 49-Inch $1,500 Display

LG recently came out with a new curved ultrawide monitor sporting a 5K resolution, a massive 49-inch display size, and a ~$1,500 price tag.

In our latest YouTube video, we went hands-on with the 49WL95C to see if it's a worthwhile purchase for a Mac user.

Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.

The 49WL95C display is similar to the 49-inch U4919DW Dell monitor that we took a look at earlier this year, and which turned out to be popular with MacRumors readers. Like the Dell monitor, the LG 49WL95C features thin bezels, a massive screen size and a deep curve.

There's an ambient light sensor at the top of the display, along with 10W speakers at the bottom of the monitor that are surprisingly loud. Adjustments can be made using the controls on the back of the right side, which is also where you'll find two USB-A ports and a 3.5mm headphone jack.


At the back, there's a single USB-C port that offers up to 80W of power for charging a MacBook, 2 HDMI ports, a DisplayPort, two additional USB-A ports, and a port for plugging in a power cable. The display has a built-in power supply, which means there's no bulky power brick to deal with, a definite plus.


The display's stand offers up full tilt, height, and swivel support, and we were impressed with the stand's build quality. It's a heavy duty stand, which is necessary since the monitor weighs in at 28 pounds. This is a huge monitor and will require a deep desk or a mounting solution to use.

It's important to note that the 49WL95C is a 5K display (5120 x 1440), but it's not a true 5K resolution. Instead, it's a 32:9 dual QHD setup with a resolution of 2560 x 1440.

LG designed the display with the expectation that buyers will be using it with multiple windows open at a time or two full screen apps rather than a single app taking up the entire 49 inches of display real estate.

You're not going to want to use this kind of display for gaming (due to the limited 60Hz refresh rate and no support for AMD's FreeSync or Nvidia's G-Sync), but it's good for those who currently use two 27-inch monitors and want something a little more seamless.

We tested the 49WL95C with a 2018 15-inch MacBook Pro, and we're not sure it's the best purchase for MacBook users. On a MacBook Pro (and a 2018 MacBook Air we also tested with) the maximum resolution we were able to get was 3480 x 1080p, which doesn't look great on such a massive display. Text, images, and other user interface elements just aren't crisp with the 1080p vertical resolution.


We tried a USB-C cable, a DisplayPort to USB-C cable, a Thunderbolt 3 dock, and an eGPU and weren't able to get the full 5120 x 1440 resolution. With an iMac Pro, though, we were able to run the display at full resolution over USB-C. It's probably also going to work well with the 2013 Mac Pro (or one of the new 2019 Mac Pro models, of course), but for Mac notebooks, we don't recommend it.

There have been other reports from Mac users who have also been unable to get the display to work at full resolution with their machines, while others have had no trouble at all, so it's not entirely clear what's going on.

There could be a graphics driver or other issue specific to similar Mac models preventing them from supporting the 5120 x 1440 resolution. If you have a Windows PC though, it works great. We had no problems with the Surface Book 2.

Let us know what you think of the 49WL95C display, and if you have one, whether you've been able to get it to run at the full resolution on a MacBook Pro or a MacBook Air.

Tag: LG


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

3 weeks ago
Will this screen be overkill for my cat videos?
Rating: 21 Votes
3 weeks ago
I wonder how much the stand costs
Rating: 16 Votes
3 weeks ago
That looks really cool, but sadly, I don't think that would fit my desk.

and we were impressed with the stand's build quality

Maybe not a $1000 build quality though.
Rating: 10 Votes
3 weeks ago
So that's a $500 display without the stand right?
Rating: 9 Votes
3 weeks ago
Never thought I'd see a $1500 display and think it's a bargain, and yet here we are. Thanks, Apple.

Since it's not as high of a resolution relatively speaking, it could be great for gaming without having bezels in the center.
Rating: 9 Votes
3 weeks ago


I assume sales of these ultra-wide monitors are driven by gaming, but are there really not enough people using monitors for things other than video consumption and gaming to justify producing monitors in anything other than increasingly wide aspect ratios?


Ultra-wides are also awesome when you work A LOT in shell windows and SQL databases -- and no, I am NOT kidding. Having a terminal window that can easily go beyond 132 characters width is extremely comfortable.
Rating: 6 Votes
3 weeks ago
At this point, I have to wonder who in their right mind would use an app in full screen like that. You enough real estate to use about three windows side-by-side.

Will this screen be overkill for my cat videos?

Nope. In fact, buy four of them.
Rating: 5 Votes
3 weeks ago
Does it come with a swivel chair!
Rating: 4 Votes
3 weeks ago

I wish Apple could have a stand alone 5k display at the same price point. I love the 6K display but that price is painful to say the least.

You can get a stand alone for $1000...
Rating: 4 Votes
3 weeks ago

One thing I don’t really understand is, I’m always looking for a taller monitor to fit in my limited desk space, not wider. (16:9 is just too wide unless I’m watching videos, 16:10 is okay, but honestly 3:2 or 4:3 is even better.) I literally wouldn’t know where to put something like this.

I assume sales of these ultra-wide monitors are driven by gaming, but are there really not enough people using monitors for things other than video consumption and gaming to justify producing monitors in anything other than increasingly wide aspect ratios?


Get a 16x10 monitor with a stand that rotates, and rotate it vertically.
Rating: 4 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]