New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Senate Draft Encryption Bill Called 'Absurd,' 'Dangerous,' and Technically Inept

A draft of an encryption bill created by Senate Intelligence Committee leaders Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein was released last night, revealing the scope of the legislation that would require technology companies to decrypt data and share it in an "intelligible format" when served with a legal order.

The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016, a copy of which was shared by Re/code, starts out by declaring "no person or entity is above the law." It says that all providers of communication services and products, from hardware to software, must both protect the privacy of residents of the United States through "implementation of appropriate data security," while still respecting the "rule of law" and complying with legal requirements and court orders to provide information stored either on devices or remotely.

feinsteinburr
To uphold both the rule of law and protect the interests and security of the United States, all persons receiving an authorized judicial order for information or data must provide, in a timely manner, responsive, intelligible information or data, or appropriate technical assistance to obtain such information.
In acknowledgement of the disagreement between the FBI and Apple, the legislation does include a clause that prevents it from authorizing "any government officer to require or prohibit any specific design or operating system to be adopted by any covered entity," and it shies away from specific technical demands, but the wording of the act itself, with no contingencies for inaccessible data, makes end-to-end encryption impossible. Any data encrypted by companies must also be able to be decrypted.

Security experts have heavily criticized the bill. Daniel Castro of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation told Re/code the bill "sets up a legal paradox" while the ACT/App Association said it amounts to a government-mandated back door. Security researcher Jonathan Zdziarski says the entire bill is dangerous, calling it "a hodgepodge of technical ineptitude combined with pockets of contradiction."
The absurdity of this bill is beyond words. Due to the technical ineptitude of its authors, combined with a hunger for unconstitutional governmental powers, the end result is a very dangerous document that will weaken the security of America's technology infrastructure. This will affect everything from the iPhone you hold in your pocket to how data is transmitted over the Internet, allowing the government to effectively break all electronic commerce and Internet security. This is bad legislation in every way, and it very subtly allows for unconstitutional government control of private industry.
In a report yesterday, Reuters said the White House has decided not to offer public support for the legislation, as "the administration remains deeply divided on the issue." The bill is still in draft form, with the language subject to changes based on input from stakeholders. In a joint statement, Burr and Feinstein said they hope to have a final version completed soon.

Update 4/13: An official draft of the Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 was released on April 13, with few changes from the version released earlier in the month.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)

34 months ago
Fascists. Not surprised it is the criminally corrupt Feinstein at the helm.
Rating: 57 Votes
34 months ago
Would it be misogynistic or antisemitic of me to observe that Dianne Feinstein looks like Emperor Palpatine in drag?
Rating: 32 Votes
34 months ago
Not a surprise....
What else can you expect from "technically-challenged" people who don't understand the purpose of encryption?
Rating: 32 Votes
34 months ago
This is the equivalent of saying you have to make beer that tastes great but at the same time has no calories.

Or delicious french fries that are also good for your health.

You can't simultaneously protect privacy and make it possible to access data at will.
Rating: 30 Votes
34 months ago
"The absurdity of this bill is beyond words. Due to the ... ineptitude of its authors, combined with a hunger for unconstitutional governmental powers, the end result is a very dangerous document that will weaken ... America."

Cut out one or two words and you realize this happens in congress a few times a year, not just with technology. ;-)
Rating: 30 Votes
34 months ago
Noooooo.... No way.... Inept......

Why is it that people are willing to stand up to these morons on technological issues, but not on anything else? Do we really think that they're any more competent in any other area?? Are these the people who you want regulating and running your life?? -__-

Edit: I would add as a reminder that this is a Republican Senate, and its no freaking better than the S***hole that was the Democratic Senate.

Beware, the statists agree on something...
Rating: 25 Votes
34 months ago
Revolution. The Time has Arrived. :apple:
Rating: 24 Votes
34 months ago

Would it be misogynistic or antisemitic of me to observe that Dianne Feinstein looks like Emperor Palpatine in drag?

Rating: 18 Votes
34 months ago

Back to flip phones I guess..


And new iPads, so the FBI can easily retrieve the information they are looking for:




Rating: 18 Votes
34 months ago
Think of all that information that gets encrypted into people's brains. Private thoughts are a haven for terrorism!!! How can we ever be safe???

#boycottBrains
Rating: 18 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]