New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers

Last month the United States Federal Communications Commission announced that it would fine AT&T $100 million for misleading customers about its unlimited data plans and not adequately warning customers about throttling their data speeds. AT&T has since responded, arguing that data throttling doesn't harm customers, the company is being prejudged and that its First Amendment rights are being violated in a response first found by The Hill (via Ars Technica).

ATT Logo
The Commission’s findings that consumers and competition were harmed are devoid of factual support and wholly implausible. Its “moderate” forfeiture penalty of $100 million is plucked out of thin air, and the injunctive sanctions it proposes are beyond the Commission’s authority. Both, moreover, reflect an unseemly effort to coerce settlement. And the NAL and the related press campaign confirm that the agency has already prejudged AT&T’s liability, abandoning any pretext that the Commission remains an impartial arbiter of the case.
AT&T, who wants the FCC to drop the fine, claims that it has made all the required disclosures to customers, pointing out that its Unlimited Data Plan customers were more likely to renew their contracts than non-Unlimited Data Plan customers. Additionally, the telecommunications company argued the FCC would be outside of its authority in both imposing the fine and making other requests because the statute of limitations on the case has passed.

Lastly, AT&T argued that the FCC has no authority to order the company to inform its customers that it violated the Transparency Rule in not telling them about speed changes when throttling data because the statement would both be untrue and a violation of AT&T's First Amendment rights.

AT&T ceased selling Unlimited Data Plans years ago but continues to have customers grandfathered to its Unlimited Data Plans. Previously, the company throttled its Unlimited Data Plan customers once they exceeded 5 GB of LTE data, but in May the company changed its policy to only throttle customers when connected to a cell tower experiencing network congestion.

Tags: FCC, AT&T


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

53 months ago
I'll throttle my bill payment, surely it won't 'harm' AT&T.
Rating: 115 Votes
53 months ago

I'm fine with the throttling personally. It's the only realistic way for everyone to have an uninterrupted connection. They're not doing anything to warrant a $100M fine.

It's like fining the water company for not "adequately warning customers" that when they use a kinked garden hose, they won't get the full pressure.

Do you work for ATT? This is crazy talk. A kinked water hose as you comparison to the water company? A better comparison would be that the water company decided you took too long of showers and cut your psi so that you couldn't even take a shower, but you would still get a drip to come out as to not technically cut your service. And that would be ridiculous just like ATTs throttling of unlimited data that was sold as no strings attached, only to attach those strings when they saw fit.
Rating: 74 Votes
53 months ago
Oh AT&T, you are such a comedian!
Rating: 29 Votes
53 months ago

I'm fine with the throttling personally. It's the only realistic way for everyone to have an uninterrupted connection. They're not doing anything to warrant a $100M fine.

It's like fining the water company for not "adequately warning customers" that when they use a kinked garden hose, they won't get the full pressure.


AT&T used to throttle me the instant I went over 5GB, even if no network congestion. The throttling was in effect until my billing cycle was up. And as for your silly water hose analogy, I can unkink my hose. I can't unkink my connection.
Rating: 24 Votes
53 months ago
If they fight it, double it. … If they fight it again, double it again. Their only interest is money, make screwing the customers expensive. They will understand expensive.


Article Link: AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers ('https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/29/att-responds-fcc-100-million-fine/')

Rating: 21 Votes
53 months ago
Sure, no harm involved. I could have lost my job because I couldn't connect to the internet at a reasonable speed. I could barely send an email with the throttled speed. Absolutely absurd statement on ATT's part.
Rating: 20 Votes
53 months ago
Dear AT&T,

We URGE you to drop the upgrade fees. We URGE you to provide better signal. We URGE you not to throttle data that we have paid for. We URGE you to provide the best customer experience.

Sincerely,

Your loyal customer since 2007
Me
Rating: 18 Votes
53 months ago
"Throttling doesn't harm customers"......What....da...?
Rating: 15 Votes
53 months ago

My big complaint is that the year I bought my iPhone the phone still had unlimited data and the keynote presentation said I could tether, but they never offered both of these at the same time.


Aside from throttling, this is the main reason I got off the unlimited plan. They withheld two major features from unlimited users, FaceTime over a cellular connection and tethering. The way they treated unlimited users was so frustrating.
Rating: 15 Votes
53 months ago
$100M should have fined them $1B and made them put everyone back on a un-throttled unlimited plan

:)
Rating: 14 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]