Skip to Content

OS X Vulnerability Can Allow Superuser Access to Unauthorized Users

FilevaultUsers looking to exploit a vulnerability in the Sudo Unix command, originally reported back in March, have received some assistance, reports Ars Technica.

The developers of Metasploit, software that makes it easier to misuse vulnerabilities in operating systems and applications, have added the Sudo vulnerability to their software suite. All versions of OS X from OS X Lion 10.7 through the current Mountain Lion 10.8.4 remain vulnerable.

Mac users should realize that an attacker must satisfy a variety of conditions before being able to exploit this vulnerability. For one, the end-user who is logged in must already have administrator privileges. And for another, the user must have successfully run sudo at least once in the past. And of course, the attacker must already have either physical or remote shell access to the target machine. In other words: this exploit can't be used in the kind of drive-by webpage attacks that last year infected some 650,000 Macs with the Flashback malware. This doesn't mean it's a non-issue though, since the exploit can be used in concert with other attacks to magnify the damage they can do.

Most of the recent exploits in Mac OS X have been related to Java, which Apple completely blocked earlier this year over security vulnerabilities, though Apple did release a standalone malware removal tool to help clean machines that were affected by a number of Java vulnerabilities.

OS X has been targeted more in recent years as it has gained in popularity. The Janicab.A malware was discovered last month, while another program called macs.app was discovered in May. That app captured and stored screenshots.

Popular Stories

Apple Event Logo

Apple Released Seven New Products Today

Wednesday March 11, 2026 7:05 am PDT by
Starting today, the seven new Apple products that were announced last week are available at Apple Stores and beginning to arrive to customers. The colorful MacBook Neo and all of the other new products are on display at most Apple Store locations around the world starting today. Apple Stores have inventory of the new products for both walk-in customers and Apple Store pickup, but...
iOS 27 Mock Quick

10+ New Features Coming in iOS 27

Friday March 13, 2026 2:13 pm PDT by
We're only three months away from Apple's WWDC 2026 event, which will see the company unveil iOS 27. With the fully revamped version of Siri possibly delayed until September, iOS 27 is shaping up to be the update we wanted iOS 26 to be. There will be new Apple Intelligence features, updates for the iPhone Fold, and more, with the latest rumors summarized below. Foldable iPhone Features...
3D Printed iPhone Fold Thumb 2

iPhone Fold: 5 Things We Learned This Week About Apple's Foldable

Friday March 13, 2026 6:24 am PDT by
It's been a big week for foldable iPhone rumors. In case you missed any of them, here are five developments that we've covered over the last few days. Apple is expected to launch the iPhone Fold this September. For everything else we know, be sure to check out our dedicated roundup. Display Crease Early reports suggested Apple had solved the crease problem that has plagued many...

Top Rated Comments

164 months ago
Since this is a "flaw" (to the extent it has been described) in sudo, it's not Mac-specific. Other flavors of UNIX are also affected. But it's more fun and gets more hits and attention when you call it an "OS X Vulnerability", as if it's Apple's mistake or fault and not due to an issue (if that's what it is) in one of several hundred non-Apple projects (http://www.sudo.ws).
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
sjinsjca Avatar
164 months ago
"I'm not too sure why a user who already has admin access would bother using an exploit to gain admin privilege - an access level he already has.

Admin != root
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
164 months ago
I'm not too sure why a user who already has admin access would bother using an exploit to gain admin privilege - an access level he already has.
Admin and root are two different levels of access. You can do some things with root that you cannot do with admin. Root is the deepest access one can have - but it's not really the goal of most hackers. An administrator account is probably the most that an attacker really needs since they can pretty much do anything they need with that account.

So an exploit that needs admin rights access and one that rehires you to have used sudo isn't one that is high priority. The number of users that run sudo at all is really small, and from a security standpoint, if you have admin rights, all security goes out the window. In other words, you don't have security.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mikethebigo Avatar
164 months ago
Sudo make me a sandwich.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
164 months ago
You don't need to run metasploit to exploit this bug.

The following command should give you root if you are logged in to OS X as an Administrator and have used the "sudo" command at least once in the past. It will also set your system clock to 01/01/1970.

sudo -k
systemsetup -setusingnetworktime Off -settimezone GMT -setdate 01:01:1970 -settime 00:00
sudo su

To set your system clock back to normal, go into the System Preferences and set the time and time zone back to the way it was.

To prevent somebody from abusing this attack, you will need to run the following command after every time you use the sudo command, until it gets patched.
sudo -K
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Dalton63841 Avatar
164 months ago
"For one, the end-user who is logged in must already have administrator privileges. And for another, the user must have successfully run sudo at least once in the past."

I'm not too sure why a user who already has admin access would bother using an exploit to gain admin privilege - an access level he already has.
What it is saying is that if an attacker already has access to your machine, AND you are on an administrator account, AND you have opened Terminal and used sudo, THEN they could maybe gain root access to your account.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)