Apple Blames High Australian Markups for Digital Content on Media Rights Holders - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Blames High Australian Markups for Digital Content on Media Rights Holders

At an Australian Parliament inquiry into high markups on technology goods and services today, Apple Australia Vice President Tony King blamed rights holders for international price disparities in the company's digital content, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.

"The pricing of this digital content is based on the wholesale prices which are set through negotiated contracts with the record labels, movie studios and TV networks," said Mr King, who is Apple's vice president for Australia, New Zealand and South Asia.

King went on to say that "the content industry still runs with perhaps old-fashioned notions of country borders or territories or markets" and that it creates confusion for customers. He also said that Apple's iTunes pricing in Australia is "comparable to other Australian physical and online stores."

When asked by Labor MP Ed Husic, who is a member of the committee conducting the inquiry, whether Apple could influence the price of digital content in Australia, King said that it was up to the rights holders. King also said that Apple would love to see "cheaper, lower prices in the Australian market," according to News.com.au.

australianmarkup
Earlier today, MacStories noted that markups in Australia average as much as 61.4% for music, 33.5% for movies and 25.9% for TV shows when a subset of content offerings is compared to prices in the United States once Australia's Goods and Services Tax (GST) has been accounted for. Markups for Apple's hardware products are more reasonable, with Mac, iPad and iPod prices in Australia generally falling within 10% of U.S. prices. The iPhone line, however, can go as high as a 16% markup for the iPhone 5 and 4S, while the iPhone 4 is actually slightly cheaper in Australia than it is in the United States.

King said that Apple had gone to great lengths to make sure that its hardware products are priced at "parity" in Australia, which takes into account Australian GST as well as the cost of delivering its products to the country.

Adobe and Microsoft were also questioned as part of the inquiry following summonses being issued last month, with Adobe explaining that it charges Australian customers $1000 extra for a software suite because users are receiving a "personalized" service on their local website. Microsoft said its prices, which include a $2000 increase for a software suite, were based on market competition and that users would vote with their wallets if they didn't agree.

Popular Stories

macworld iphone 18 pro colors

iPhone 18 Pro's Four Rumored Colors Revealed, Including 'Dark Cherry'

Friday April 17, 2026 3:50 am PDT by
A source said to be familiar with Apple's supply chain today revealed the color options Apple is planning for the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and the upcoming foldable iPhone. Image via Macworld. The information comes from Macworld, which says the signature new color for this year's Pro models will be Dark Cherry, a deep wine-like red. While other sources had previously reported on a...
macOS 27 on MacBook Pro

macOS 27 Will Mark the End of an Era

Saturday April 18, 2026 6:45 am PDT by
During its Platforms State of the Union segment at WWDC 2025, Apple revealed that macOS 26 Tahoe is the final major macOS version for Intel-based Macs. The upcoming macOS 27 release will be compatible with Apple silicon Macs only, meaning that you will need a Mac with an M-series chip or a MacBook Neo with an A18 Pro chip in order to install the software update. macOS 27 should be available...
Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple Says CarPlay Ultra is Coming to These Vehicle Brands

Saturday April 18, 2026 5:59 am PDT by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly a year later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. CarPlay Ultra...

Top Rated Comments

171 months ago
Apple's response sounds about right, and seems to be reflected in the percentage markups; that is, there's not an across-the-board markup for all content, making it believable that music rights holders have different demands from movies or TV shows.

Adobe and Microsoft's responses are complete ass. Show me the "personalized service on their local website". And let me trade it in for the extra $1000 I'm outlaying for the privilege of that non-existent service, since I'd rather have the cash. Microsoft's is simply that people are paying it, so they can charge it. Which is true, but still ass-worthy.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Santabean2000 Avatar
171 months ago
I'm sick of the content industry holding the world to ransom. It's almost our duty to display civil disobedience (read downloads) to force them into alternative models.

People will pay a reasonable fee for good content if the model is done right. Piracy for music has tailed away since the rise of Spotify et al. It's about time the TV and film industry moved to similar offerings.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
171 months ago
Obviously the 61.4% price markup indicates to me their negotiations for Australia were pretty poor. Maybe they should renegotiate and get this resolved. Seems to me like price gouging at this rate.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Krazy Bill Avatar
171 months ago
I'm sick of the content industry holding the world to ransom.
Ransom? :eek:

Don't buy it. You'll live - I promise.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jav6454 Avatar
171 months ago
Apple's response sounds about right, and seems to be reflected in the percentage markups; that is, there's not an across-the-board markup for all content, making it believable that music rights holders have different demands from movies or TV shows.

Adobe and Microsoft's responses are complete ass. Show me the "personalized service on their local website". And let me trade it in for the extra $1000 I'm outlaying for the privilege of that non-existent service, since I'd rather have the cash. Microsoft's is simply that people are paying it, so they can charge it. Which is true, but still ass-worthy.

Exact same thinking. Apple was more, "Don't look at me" while Microsoft and Adobe were "Pfff, cause we can, who else you gonna turn too?"
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
171 months ago
Surprise surprise, we are on an apple forum and apple couldn't possibly do anything wrong but everyone else has....
That's utter rubbish.

Look at the responses. Apple at least tried to explain or fob the blame off onto someone else with a semi-plausible excuse. Neither Adobe nor Microsoft, who are entirely in control of the prices of their products - since they actually make them - even bothered.
Look at the numbers. They're all jacked up on the music prices. Because everybody knows the music industry is desperate to keep prices low, so it must all be Apple.

Rubbish. Complete garbage from an Apple hipster.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)