Apple Wins Last-Gasp Reprieve From Brazil App Store Changes - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Wins Last-Gasp Reprieve From Brazil App Store Changes

A Brazilian federal court has overturned an antitrust ruling that would have required Apple to allow third-party payment systems in the App Store within 20 days.

app store awards 2022
The initial ruling, issued on November 26, came in response to a 2022 complaint from Latin American e-commerce platform MercadoLibre. The regulator had ordered Apple to remove restrictions on alternative payment systems and allow developers to market different payment options for in-app purchases, threatening daily fines of $43,000 for non-compliance.

But Judge Eduardo Santos da Rocha Penteado of the 14th Federal Civil Court on Thursday called the original decision by Brazil's competition regulator (Cade) "disproportionate and unnecessary."

In his decision, Penteado acknowledged that the measures demanded by Cade would "change, in a sensitive and structural way" Apple's business operations. He said that the technical complexity of the required changes and the global regulatory landscape, particularly similar decisions in the European Union, warranted a more thorough discussion.

The decision came hours after reports emerged of Apple appealing the original order, with the company arguing that the required changes were too complex to implement within the given time frame.

While the injunction has been overturned, the broader antitrust investigation into Apple's App Store practices will continue. Cade is expected to appeal the court's decision, and Apple could still eventually be required to implement changes to its App Store policies in Brazil.

The case follows similar regulatory challenges Apple faces globally, including a recent €1.8 billion fine from the European Commission over music streaming app restrictions. Apple has maintained throughout that the Brazilian regulator's demands would threaten user privacy and security.

(Via 9to5Mac.)

Popular Stories

intel macs no more updates

Mac App Store Apps Can Now Drop Support for Intel Macs

Tuesday September 1, 2026 4:50 pm PDT by
Apple today informed developers that universal Mac App Store apps that require macOS 13 or later can remove support for Intel-based Mac computers. We're reaching out to let you know that universal macOS apps on the Mac App Store that require macOS 13 or later can now remove support for Intel-based Mac computers. By removing support for Intel-based Mac computers, you can simplify your...
MapQuest Logo 2026

MapQuest Tops App Store Charts After Refusing 'Lake America' Change

Monday August 31, 2026 7:49 am PDT by
MapQuest is in the spotlight this week after refusing to change "Lake Ontario" to "Lake America" on its map following an executive order issued by U.S. President Donald Trump last week. As of Monday morning, the MapQuest app is the top free iPhone app on Apple's App Store charts in Canada and fourth on the equivalent U.S. chart. For our younger readers, MapQuest was once a popular service...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Plans to Squeeze More Revenue From the App Store, Report Says

Monday September 7, 2026 3:19 am PDT by
Apple is looking at further ways to monetize the App Store and increase the company's recurring revenue from the platform, according to a new report. Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said that newly appointed Apple CEO John Ternus and services chief Eddy Cue are behind the effort to raise margins from the App Store, which already generates Apple an estimated ...

Top Rated Comments

wbeasley Avatar
23 months ago

Yeah, it's easy for Apple to just buy the currpt Brazilian judge instead of complying with county's regulations.
and your proof that Apple bought off a judge? :)

just because the outcome doesnt align with your opinion...

there's a legal term for spreading misinformation.
And even social media posts need to adhere to laws. Or risk legal action... :)
And media hosts can also face legal issues by allowing posts like that to remain online.

By all means have your opinions, offline.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
oofio2461 Avatar
23 months ago
I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago

Yeah, it's easy for Apple to just buy the currpt Brazilian judge instead of complying with county's regulations.
You know Apple bought the judge how? Where's your evidence?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago

I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
Why does this principle not apply to a calculator then? Or a car? Or a robot vacuum? Why is it not a violation of basic rights for those to not offer easy ways to modify the software out of the box? It’s because there is no fundamental human right that says a company cannot make a closed-system product, even a computer.

The truth is you do indeed have the choice to do what you want with it after you’ve bought it—as in, just like with a calculator/car/vacuum, you are free to try to hack it and you won’t go to jail. Apple is also free to not continue offering support for your hardware if you violate the terms under which you chose to buy it. Freedom goes both ways.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago

I always wonder if money changes hands when this happens.
Yes, Apple continues to pay developers. Apple pays employees. Apple pays taxes. Developers pay taxes with the money they made. People buy stuff. Some people buy Apple's stuff. The earth continues to turn.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spazzcat Avatar
23 months ago

I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
you don't own the software.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)