FDA Warns Consumers Not to Use Smart Watches or Rings That Claim to Measure Blood Glucose Levels

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not want consumers to purchase or use smart watches or smart rings that claim to measure blood glucose levels using non-invasive methods. In a safety warning shared today, the FDA says that smart devices that claim to check blood sugar without piercing the skin can lead to errors in diabetes management, including taking too much or too little medication.

Apple Watch Blood Glucose Monitoring Feature 2
No smart watch or smart ring that is intended to measure or estimate blood glucose values non-invasively has been authorized, cleared, or approved by the FDA. These non-invasive devices are different from continuous glucose monitoring devices (CGMs) that relay data through a smart watch app.

Apple is rumored to be working on a version of the Apple Watch that will be able to measure blood glucose non-invasively, but launch of such a device is still several years away. Apple has been exploring optical absorption spectroscopy using a laser to shine light under the skin to determine a person's blood glucose level, but as of 2023, Apple's work remained at a proof-of-concept stage.

As of right now, there are several low-cost smart watches and smart rings that claim to be able to monitor glucose levels without a skin prick or without integrating with a CGM device. The FDA says patients should avoid such devices, and doctors should warn patients about the risks of using unauthorized blood glucose measuring products.

Sellers of these smartwatches and smart rings claim their devices measure blood glucose levels without requiring people to prick their finger or pierce the skin. They claim to use non-invasive techniques. These smartwatches and smart rings do not directly test blood glucose levels.

These smartwatches and smart rings are manufactured by dozens of companies and sold under multiple brand names. This safety communication applies to any smartwatch or smart ring that claims to measure blood glucose without piercing the skin, regardless of manufacturer or brand.

The FDA says that it is working to ensure that manufacturers, distributors, and sellers do not illegally market unauthorized smart watches or smart rings that claim to measure blood glucose levels.

If Apple does end up releasing an Apple Watch that includes a sensor for non-invasive blood glucose monitoring, Apple will need to get FDA approval before it is allowed to sell it in the U.S. Other companies like Samsung are working on similar technology, but there is no proven and approved non-invasive blood sugar monitoring method on the market as of right now.

Tag: FDA

Popular Stories

MacRumors x Bloomberg Banner Cool

Apple Reportedly Plans to Unveil at Least Five New Products Next Week

Sunday February 22, 2026 9:48 am PST by
In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said Apple will have a three-day stretch of product announcements from Monday, March 2 through Wednesday, March 4. In total, he expects Apple to introduce "at least five products." Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. A week ago, Apple invited selected journalists and content creators to an "Apple Experience" in...
maxresdefault

iPhone Fold: Launch, Pricing, and What to Expect From Apple's Foldable

Friday February 20, 2026 3:21 am PST by
Apple is expected to launch a new foldable iPhone this year, based on multiple rumors and credible sources. The long-awaited device has been rumored for years now, but signs increasingly suggest that Apple will release its first foldable device in 2026. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Below, we've collated an updated set of key details that have been leaked about ...
Apple Watch 15 Tips Every Owner Needs to Know Feature

Apple Watch: 15 Tips Every Owner Needs to Know

Thursday February 19, 2026 7:38 am PST by
Apple Watch is now eleven generations in, and packed with useful features that are easy to miss at first glance. To help you get more out of your new device, we've rounded up 15 practical tips you might not have discovered yet, including a few that long-time users often overlook. Bounce Between Two Apps On your Apple Watch, double-press the Digital Crown to see a deck of all currently...
iOS 26

iOS 26.3.1 Update for iPhones Coming Soon as 'Apple Experience' Nears

Sunday February 22, 2026 5:29 pm PST by
Apple's software engineers are testing iOS 26.3.1, according to the MacRumors visitor logs, which have been a reliable indicator of upcoming iOS versions. iOS 26.3.1 should be a minor update that fixes bugs and/or security vulnerabilities, and it will likely be released within the next two weeks. Last month, Apple released iOS 26.2.1 with bug fixes and support for the second-generation...
Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature Pink

Three Upcoming Apple Products Seemingly Spotted in macOS 26.3 Code

Friday February 20, 2026 7:36 am PST by
macOS 26.3 hints at Apple's rumored lower-cost MacBook, and two new Studio Display models, according to Macworld's Filipe Espósito. Espósito found the following codenames within macOS 26.3's source code, and he revealed the upcoming products that they likely correspond with, based on previous reporting from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman and others. The codenames:J700: Lower-cost MacBook J427:...

Top Rated Comments

26 months ago

The FDA wants their money of course, but also yikes when the FDA actually makes a comment on something like this. Does not bode well for anyone hoping for an advancement in this tech anytime soon.
FDA doesn't get paid for this.

The issue is that nobody has made a reliable blood monitor. Not even close.

I mean, check the oxygen sensor, mine regularly drops to 88% on my watch, but is never below 98% when I go to the doctor.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dannyyankou Avatar
26 months ago
There's nothing wrong with using this tech. But it shouldn't be a substitute. If my Apple Watch says my heart rate spiked, I verify with a blood pressure monitor that shows heart rate data.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
26 months ago
It is a sad statement about the world we live in when people think the FDA is partaking in some kind of scam or has something to gain from warning people not to rely on devices not meeting the criteria to be an approved medical device.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
26 months ago

There is another solution for both cases: Just let a doctor check it…
It is as easy as that. Then you get an approved diagnose.
Diabetics cannot see a doctor any time they want to eat! Glucose monitoring it an essential part of insulin management so it needs to be self monitored, which is why the FDA is issuing this warning. If something gives a reading that is either too high or too then you can risk your health taking the wrong dose. There are international standards on the safe margins of error that devices need to achieve to be certified.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jz0309 Avatar
26 months ago
and for this retirement, the AW will never (imho) provide CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) as that would make it a medical device (read very expensive). now they might make a "special edition", or, they'll negotiate with the FDA to provide "trends", lacking actual data, just saying high, low etc
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JapanApple Avatar
26 months ago
"The FDA says patients should avoid such devices, and doctors should warn patients about the risks of using unauthorized blood glucose measuring products."

Agreed, Apple devices or no Apple devices, these are only guesstimations at the least. Always use reliable methods.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)