Apple Watch Infringed Masimo's Pulse Oximetry Patent, US Judge Rules - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Watch Infringed Masimo's Pulse Oximetry Patent, US Judge Rules

Apple infringed on one of medical technology company Masimo's pulse oximeter patents when it launched Apple Watch models that use light sensors to measure the amount of oxygen in the blood, an International Trade Commission (ITC) judge ruled on Tuesday.

apple watch 6s 202009
Masimo, which designs pulse oximetry devices, has been embroiled in an ongoing battle with Apple over several health capabilities found in some Apple Watch models, and Masimo has been pushing to have the models banned in the United States.

Medical grade pulse oximetry devices are what Masimo specializes in, and pulse oximetry is a feature that Apple added to the Apple Watch with the Series 6 model. The feature found in the Series 6 and later Apple Watch models uses light to detect the amount of oxygen in the blood, with the feature joining heart rate monitoring and ECG capabilities.

In June 2021, Masimo filed a patent infringement lawsuit with the ITC asking it to halt imports of the Apple Watch Series 6 because of patent infringements related to blood oxygen monitoring.

In Tuesday's ruling, the judge concluded that four other patents at issue were not infringed. The ITC will now consider whether to implement an import ban on Apple Watch models that include the blood oxygen monitoring feature, according to the medical device maker. The final determination is expected to be completed by May 10.

"We are happy that the judge recognized Apple's infringement of Masimo's pulse oximetry technology and took this critical first step toward accountability," said Masimo CEO Joe Kiani in a statement given to MD+DI. "Today's decision should help restore fairness in the market. Apple has similarly infringed on other companies' technologies, and we believe today's ruling exposes Apple as a company that takes other companies' innovations and repackages them."

"We respectfully disagree with today's decision, and look forward to a full review by the Commission," Apple said in a statement reported by Reuters.

Masimo initially sued Apple in January 2020, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets and improperly using Masimo inventions. In the prior filing, Masimo claimed that Apple sneakily poached Masimo employees and used patented Masimo technology when developing the sensors used in the Apple Watch.

Popular Stories

All Screen iPhone 2030 Feature Sans Text

iPhone 18 Pro: Nine Reasons Not to Upgrade This Year

Monday September 7, 2026 5:01 am PDT by
Apple is set to unveil new iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max models on Wednesday, September 9, and the devices are expected to feature a design that's largely similar to the iPhone 17 Pro models, with a peppering of enhancements inside. Major changes are not expected until next year, when Apple is expected to introduce a radically redesigned 20th-anniversary iPhone. If you're thinking of...
iPhone 18 Pro Dark Cherry Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Reportedly Starts With 256GB of Storage

Thursday September 3, 2026 9:22 am PDT by
While the iPhone 17 Pro has double the base storage compared to the iPhone 16 Pro, there will apparently be no further increase this year. Taiwanese research firm TrendForce today again reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models will start with 256GB of storage, like the iPhone 17 Pro models. Minimum storage capacities by model:iPhone 16 Pro: 128GB iPhone 17 Pro: 256GB iPhone 18 Pro...
apple watch series 12

Leak Hints at Four New Features for Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4

Monday September 7, 2026 8:57 am PDT by
Ahead of the announcement of the Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4 later this week, code in the watchOS 27 and iOS 27 betas points to a series of new features for the product line. The information comes from a new post from MacRumors forums member "pdfu." The findings include: New "Readiness" app: An all-new separate Watch app referred to in code as "Readiness," distinct from the...

Top Rated Comments

kesenwangs Avatar
48 months ago

Making numbers up but truly seems 99% here will blindly defend their Daddy Apple. The mods here don’t seem to do anything about it at all.
Why should mods police general opinions? If a majority wants to think or express themselves in a similar manner that’s their choice. It’s not really a role of mod’s to police conversations that don’t go against any of the sites policies.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Skeptical.me Avatar
48 months ago
If Apple truly infringed on the patent of the technology, they should be held accountable
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
48 months ago
Before people rush here accusing them of patent trolling, just think whether apple would do the same if the other company infringed apples patents.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
pdaholic Avatar
48 months ago
https://www.macrumors.com/2021/06/30/masimo-apple-watch-series-6-itc-import-ban/

Fun to look back at this thread for all the comments saying Masimo is wasting their time trying to sue Apple.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
laptech Avatar
48 months ago
Apple has a history of this, hiring/headhunting/poaching employees from rival companies and then low and behold, patents that Apple were not approved to use turn up in their products. Didn't this happen with with Qualcomm and Broadcom back in the day when they poached employees from those companies and didn't an ex-employee of a car company get arrested for stealing company files when poached by Apple for their Apple car project?
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WiiDSmoker Avatar
48 months ago

https://www.macrumors.com/2021/06/30/masimo-apple-watch-series-6-itc-import-ban/

Fun to look back at this thread for all the comments saying Masimo is wasting their time trying to sue Apple.
Making numbers up but truly seems 99% here will blindly defend their Daddy Apple. The mods here don’t seem to do anything about it at all.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)