Apple Watch Infringed Masimo's Pulse Oximetry Patent, US Judge Rules - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Watch Infringed Masimo's Pulse Oximetry Patent, US Judge Rules

Apple infringed on one of medical technology company Masimo's pulse oximeter patents when it launched Apple Watch models that use light sensors to measure the amount of oxygen in the blood, an International Trade Commission (ITC) judge ruled on Tuesday.

apple watch 6s 202009
Masimo, which designs pulse oximetry devices, has been embroiled in an ongoing battle with Apple over several health capabilities found in some Apple Watch models, and Masimo has been pushing to have the models banned in the United States.

Medical grade pulse oximetry devices are what Masimo specializes in, and pulse oximetry is a feature that Apple added to the Apple Watch with the Series 6 model. The feature found in the Series 6 and later Apple Watch models uses light to detect the amount of oxygen in the blood, with the feature joining heart rate monitoring and ECG capabilities.

In June 2021, Masimo filed a patent infringement lawsuit with the ITC asking it to halt imports of the Apple Watch Series 6 because of patent infringements related to blood oxygen monitoring.

In Tuesday's ruling, the judge concluded that four other patents at issue were not infringed. The ITC will now consider whether to implement an import ban on Apple Watch models that include the blood oxygen monitoring feature, according to the medical device maker. The final determination is expected to be completed by May 10.

"We are happy that the judge recognized Apple's infringement of Masimo's pulse oximetry technology and took this critical first step toward accountability," said Masimo CEO Joe Kiani in a statement given to MD+DI. "Today's decision should help restore fairness in the market. Apple has similarly infringed on other companies' technologies, and we believe today's ruling exposes Apple as a company that takes other companies' innovations and repackages them."

"We respectfully disagree with today's decision, and look forward to a full review by the Commission," Apple said in a statement reported by Reuters.

Masimo initially sued Apple in January 2020, accusing the company of stealing trade secrets and improperly using Masimo inventions. In the prior filing, Masimo claimed that Apple sneakily poached Masimo employees and used patented Masimo technology when developing the sensors used in the Apple Watch.

Popular Stories

face id

Apple Sued Over Alleged Face ID Patent Infringement

Tuesday September 8, 2026 7:51 am PDT by
TrinamiX, a subsidiary of the German chemical giant BASF, is suing Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, accusing the company of infringing seven patents related to face authentication technology used in Face ID. In its complaint, first reported by Reuters, trinamiX said it spent years developing technology to stop people from fooling face unlock systems with a...
iPhone Handoff iOS 27 Feature

T-Mobile to Charge $5 a Month for iOS 27 iPhone Handoff

Thursday September 10, 2026 3:58 pm PDT by
T-Mobile will charge customers $5 per month to use iPhone Handoff, an e-SIM feature that allows the same phone number to be used on two separate iPhones. iPhone Handoff requires carrier support, and at launch, only T-Mobile users in the U.S. and Deutsche Telekom users in Germany will be able to use it. T-Mobile says customers can use their number across two compatible iPhone models and...
iphone duo

IMAX Reacts to iPhone Duo's 1:1.4 Aspect Ratio Displays

Friday September 11, 2026 4:42 am PDT by
Production theater company IMAX has responded in a mixed way to Apple's embrace of a 1:1.4 aspect ratio on the iPhone Duo's inner and outer displays. The boxier ratio happens to be very close to the classic "full-frame" IMAX 1.43:1 aspect ratio, which comes from the geometry of the company's original 15-perforation/70mm film system. In response to an X post from someone wondering if we'll see...

Top Rated Comments

kesenwangs Avatar
48 months ago

Making numbers up but truly seems 99% here will blindly defend their Daddy Apple. The mods here don’t seem to do anything about it at all.
Why should mods police general opinions? If a majority wants to think or express themselves in a similar manner that’s their choice. It’s not really a role of mod’s to police conversations that don’t go against any of the sites policies.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Skeptical.me Avatar
48 months ago
If Apple truly infringed on the patent of the technology, they should be held accountable
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
48 months ago
Before people rush here accusing them of patent trolling, just think whether apple would do the same if the other company infringed apples patents.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
pdaholic Avatar
48 months ago
https://www.macrumors.com/2021/06/30/masimo-apple-watch-series-6-itc-import-ban/

Fun to look back at this thread for all the comments saying Masimo is wasting their time trying to sue Apple.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
laptech Avatar
48 months ago
Apple has a history of this, hiring/headhunting/poaching employees from rival companies and then low and behold, patents that Apple were not approved to use turn up in their products. Didn't this happen with with Qualcomm and Broadcom back in the day when they poached employees from those companies and didn't an ex-employee of a car company get arrested for stealing company files when poached by Apple for their Apple car project?
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WiiDSmoker Avatar
48 months ago

https://www.macrumors.com/2021/06/30/masimo-apple-watch-series-6-itc-import-ban/

Fun to look back at this thread for all the comments saying Masimo is wasting their time trying to sue Apple.
Making numbers up but truly seems 99% here will blindly defend their Daddy Apple. The mods here don’t seem to do anything about it at all.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)