Apple Says Blix's Twice-Tossed Anti-Competitive Lawsuit Alleged 'False Conspiracy Theories' [Updated]

Apple has been fighting an antitrust lawsuit against Blix, the developer of BlueMail, an app that was removed from the App Store in June 2019 after violating Apple's ‌App Store‌ guidelines.

bluemail mac app store
Blix accused Apple of manipulating search results in its ‌App Store‌ to suppress third-party competition, and it also claimed that Apple had copied its patented messaging technology for the Sign In with Apple feature.

Blix had its lawsuit dismissed in December, but then refiled. Apple asked the judge to toss out the case, and the motion was granted, with the case being dismissed a second time on Friday. In a statement, Apple said that Blix had "alleged false conspiracy theories and anti-competitive claims," and that the judge's decision confirms that Apple has "consistently acted legally."

"Blix, a member of the Coalition for App Fairness and frequent complainer to press and regulators, alleged false conspiracy theories and anti-competitive claims against Apple. The court correctly rejected these claims and threw out Blix's case. This case demonstrates that Apple has consistently acted legally by introducing its own innovative products and features that promote competition."

According to the judge, Blix was unable to prove in court that Sign In with Apple restricted competition or that Apple's actions were harming competition.

Apple's current policy of requiring Sign In With Apple whenever any SSO product is offered permits new competitors and competition (including Blix) because it does not foreclose the use of other SSOs. Allowing competition is the opposite of unlawfully constraining competition, so, again, Blix has failed to state a claim.

Blix is one of several major developers that have joined the anti-Apple Coalition for App Fairness, a group that is against Apple's alleged anti-competitive policies and ‌App Store‌ fees. Other members include Spotify, Basecamp, Corellium, Epic Games, and Tile, all companies that have also had legal issues with Apple.

Update: In a statement, Blix said that it is disappointed by the court's decision.

Blix accurately described Apple’s monopoly power in mobile OS, and Apple chose not to contest that in court. At the same time, we are disappointed by the court's decision to somewhat signal that Apple can put sand in the gears to competitors and change its developer guidelines as it sees fit. This includes kicking BlueMail off the App Store for 8 months, stonewalling BlueMail for many weeks a year later and various other bullying tactics. These are facts that Apple did not refute in court.

We are glad that the fairness movement we’ve started for app developers to speak out the truth against Apple continues to gain momentum and we have high hopes that the Biden administration, the EU Commission, Australia and other countries will limit Apple's disproportionate power.

Blix will continue to fight for the fundamental and essential app developers’ rights and will stand firm in allowing fair and balanced competition. The digital markets would be much more innovative had Apple allowed for true competition. The ability to innovate by small businesses continues to be at stake.

Top Rated Comments

Art Mark Avatar
15 weeks ago
Companies could try and make great products that people want or they can continue to pretend there is a monopoly at play. Pick which you direction you support.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cmaier Avatar
15 weeks ago

How-best to circumvent Apple's Stranglehold on App Discovery is the #1 challenge most App Devs have !

That's at the core of the problem.

Apple's cut is secondary, except to the companies who are already a Household Name !

"App Discovery" App Stores would go a long ways towards Fixing the Problem !

Apple would NO longer be able to Control the Narrative.

Why we don't have those already, at least here in the States, is very puzzling to me.

Congress has clearly been asleep at the wheel.

Or perhaps, Apple has been greasing their RE-election pockets (to prevent action) !

ONE Prime Example is all it will take for the App Store to be Broken Up !

IMO, "Suppression of Third-Party App Innovation" will very-likely be the Catalyst for the Break Up.

Are there examples of that today that can proven in court ?

YES, absolutely YES !

Phil Schiller "may" soon become a sacrificial lamb !

To protect Cook & the Apple brand, that is.
“I can’t understand why my ****** app isn’t selling! It must be because of ‘app discovery!’ Damned Apple!”
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
I7guy Avatar
15 weeks ago
So a app that isn't popular means that Apple is guilty of anti-competitive behavior? Seems they are attempting to weaponize the legal system.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
I7guy Avatar
15 weeks ago

[...]

Are there examples of that today that can proven in court ?

YES, absolutely YES !

[...]
What examples would those be?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
thenewperson Avatar
15 weeks ago

I'm missing something here. If I want to build my own SSO method and make it the exclusive option for my App, and Apple says no, you have to also include SIWA along side it, even if I don't want that...how exactly is that not anti-competitive behavior?
If you build your own method Apple doesn't require you to add SIWA. It's when you use a 3rd party one.

However, I'm a bit at a loss how even forcing SIWA on every app is anti-competitive if they aren't taking away the ability to use yours still.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
I7guy Avatar
15 weeks ago
"Blix accused Apple of manipulating search results in its App Store to suppress third-party competition," = "not popular"
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Related Stories

app store blue banner

Apple's In-App Purchase Rules Are Anti-Competitive, Rules Dutch Antitrust Watchdog

Thursday October 7, 2021 1:41 pm PDT by
Apple's in-app purchase requirements are anti-competitive, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has decided, reports Reuters. The ACM has ordered Apple to make changes to the rules that force developers to use in-app payment options. The Dutch antitrust watchdog has been investigating Apple since 2019, and while the probe started out as a look into whether Apple's App...
app store blue banner epic 1

Epic Games vs. Apple Judgment Allows App Store Developers to Link to Alternative Payment Methods

Friday September 10, 2021 8:43 am PDT by
A decision was reached today in the high-profile Epic Games v. Apple trial, with U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruling that Apple's anti-steering conduct is anti-competitive, and ruling in favor of Apple on all other counts. In a 185-page ruling, Judge Rogers said "the Court cannot ultimately conclude that Apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws," but...
app store blue banner uk fixed

Apple Could Be Forced to Follow New Digital Competition Rules or Face Fines, Under UK Proposal

Tuesday July 20, 2021 1:25 am PDT by
The U.K. government is today unveiling its plan to regulate tech giants, such as Apple, to ensure that the U.K's digital market, which includes platforms such as the App Store, is open for competition, and not dominated by any particular company. In April, the U.K. created the DMU or Digital Markets Unit under the Competition and Markets Authority. With newly given powers, that new unit will ...
fortnite apple logo 2

Epic CEO: Judge's Decision 'Isn't a Win for Developers or for Consumers,' Fortnite Not Immediately Returning to App Store

Friday September 10, 2021 10:37 am PDT by
The year-long dispute between Epic Games and Apple reached a milestone with Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers delivering a middle-of-the road verdict that isn't quite what Epic Games or Apple wanted. Apple will not be required to support third-party app stores as Epic Games pushed for, but Apple will have to let developers offer "buttons, external links, or other calls to action" to direct customers to ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Apple Files Appeal in Epic Games Lawsuit, Asks to Delay App Store Changes

Friday October 8, 2021 4:17 pm PDT by
Apple has opted to appeal the ruling meted out by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Epic Games vs. Apple lawsuit back in September, and today filed a notice of appeal with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Cupertino company is planning to appeal the ruling that would require it to change its App Store rules to allow developers to add in-app links ...
app store blue banner uk

UK Class Action Accuses Apple of Breaking Competition Law by Overcharging for Apps

Tuesday May 11, 2021 12:54 am PDT by
A new legal case filed with the U.K.'s Competition Appeal Tribunal has accused Apple of breaching competition law by overcharging nearly 20 million customers for App Store purchases. The collective action case alleges Apple's 30% commission on app sales and consumers' forced use of its own payment processing system generates "unlawfully excessive levels of profit," and calls for the company...
app store blue banner

Apple Updates App Store Guidelines as Part of Agreement With U.S. Developers

Friday October 22, 2021 1:00 pm PDT by
Apple today announced it has updated its App Store Review Guidelines with three key changes related to outside-of-app communications, collecting contact information within an app, and in-app events featured in the App Store. In late August, Apple announced it had reached a $100 million settlement that, pending court approval, would resolve a class action lawsuit from U.S. developers who...
app store gold banner

Notice to Developers: You Could Be Entitled to Between a $250 and $30,000 Payment From Apple

Friday August 27, 2021 6:55 am PDT by
Apple on Thursday evening announced it has reached a $100 million settlement that, pending court approval, will resolve a class action lawsuit from U.S. developers who alleged that Apple has a monopoly on the distribution of iOS apps and in-app purchases. As part of the settlement, some U.S. developers would be entitled to receive a payment from Apple, so long as they meet certain...
app store blue banner epic 1

Epic Games Not Satisfied With Ruling in Case Against Apple, Files Appeal

Monday September 13, 2021 2:02 am PDT by
Epic Games has filed an appeal against the ruling in its case against Apple, further prolonging the already year-long legal battle between the two companies. The ruling, announced on Friday, sided with Apple on nine out of the ten counts that Epic Games had presented against the company. Epic, from the start, had alleged that Apple is anti-competitive and that it should open up its devices...
iphone se black

Apple Agrees to Pay $95 Million to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Refurbished Devices Aren't 'Equivalent to New'

Monday October 4, 2021 8:59 pm PDT by
Apple on Friday reached a $95 million settlement that, pending court approval, will resolve a class action lawsuit that accused the company of violating the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act and other U.S. laws by replacing customers' devices covered by AppleCare with refurbished devices, according to court documents accessed by MacRumors. Apple's Repair Terms and Conditions for the U.S. state...